Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.30.2009 11:22 am

Commentary: A plan for the Current and Jacks Fork rivers

  • Email this
  • Print this

By Ken Midkiff

Thousands of folks from St. Louis take float trips on the Current and Jacks Fork rivers – designated in 1964 by the US Congress as the Ozark National Scenic Riverways (NSR).  Congress also gave a mandate to the Department of the Interior to “preserve and protect” the Ozark National Scenic Riverways.  The Ozark National Scenic Riverways became a national park, administered by the National Park Service (NPS).  This was done with the approval of the Missouri General Assembly and Governor.

Unfortunately, the NPS has, over the years between 1964 and now – 45 years later – let things slip a bit and has shown itself to be a poor steward of what Governor Nixon has referred to as the “prime jewels of the Ozarks”.

Consider:

  • There are miles and miles of illegal Off-Road Vehicle trails.  The lands adjacent to the Jacks Fork and Current are part of the ONSR and motorized access to these lands is supposed to be restricted to existing roads, but the NPS has failed enforce such restrictions and the ONSR lands are quite literally riddled with such illegal ORV trails.
  • There are horsepower limits on boats – but due to local opposition, allegedly assisted by a US Congressperson, large, loud, and fast boats are common on both te Jacks Fork and the Current.  Both rivers are narrow, and low-impact recreationists – canoeists, tubers, rafters and kayakers -  are in constant danger of being run over or swamped.
  • The Jacks Fork is on the “impaired” waterbody list.  At times, it is so filled with bacteria that it is unhealthy to come in contact with the water.  Those times that it is unhealthy coincide with large – thousands and thousands of horses – horse rides.  The horse ride trails cross the Jacks Fork many times, and horse dung is the primary source of contamination.
  • Much of the lands along the rivers was acquired by the NPS to create the national park, but some of the lands are still in private ownership and the NPS has easements.  The NPS can grant what is known as “scenic easements” on public and private lands.  Unfortunately, those “scenic easements” have led to much abuse allowing landowners to clear vegetation (and any wildlife that might depend on such trees and brush) and build on these lands.  Some unscrupulous landowners have then sold what they have constructed and the hills along the ONSR have become little more than suburbs.
  • Due to an “anything goes” attitude, the ONSR and in particular the Current River has a reputation for lewd, drunken, nude and rude behaviors.  While the NPS has now taken steps to curtail such behavior, it is too little, too late.  Prevention of such rowdiness, not reaction to it, would have been much more effective, and would have ensured that family float trips would have continued to be enjoyable affairs, rather than miserable voyages accompanied by those who view the OSNR as a place to let loose.

While some of these things should never have been allowed, it is not too late to turn things back to those peaceful days of 1964.  The NPS has developed a new and preliminary General Management Plan.  Alternative A is a low-impact alternative and much preferable to the others, although there is no mention of horses.  Alternative C is particularly objectionable, because it would allow more horses, more motors, more accesses, more roads and trails, and more development.   Alternative C seems to fly in the face of the federal mandate to “protect and preserve”.

To obtain a copy of the General Management Plan and to comment on it, write to the Superintendent, Ozark National Scenic Riverways, PO Box 490, Van Buren, MO  63965  or online here. Whether you comment by mail or online, these are due by July 31.c

Ken Midkiff of Columbia, Mo., is conservation chair of the Osage Group Sierra Club.

6 comments

Comments are closed.

I am for alternative C. More horses, more motors more accesses, more roads and trails and development means more people having fun and SPENDING MONEY! The more people having fun and enjoying these parts of Missouri the more likly they will return. There is nothing you can build that can not be torn down and removed in the future if it is found to hurt the environment. There is no trail or road that can not be blocked in the future if it is found to hurt the environment. The horses and the river problem is a short lived problem and then it all goes down the river. This is nothing that has not been going on for years. A little tolerance for people having fun can go along way. It’s not like they get to have fun during the week.

— David Podgornik
12:53 pm June 30th, 2009

I disagree Dave. If you can’t use the area the way nature made it, then go find what you are looking for elsewhere. MoDNR does a good job in a lot of what they do, but even they can’t handle the overwhelming abuse that many of the Ozark National Scenic rivers are enduring. It doesn’t take much intelligence to imagine that powerboats, large herds of horses, and all-terrain vehicles damage the ecosystem a great deal.

We don’t need any more Option Cs.

— Tim
1:25 pm June 30th, 2009

There aren’t many areas in Mo. and the Ozarks where man’s impact has not been devastating. The Current and the Jack’s Fork are gems that should be maintained as natural areas. Motor sports fans (ATV’s and powerboats) have taken over most of Mo.’s thousands of miles of rivers. Some natural experience should be allowed to remain. Same for horse pollution. There are plenty of trails elsewhere without making it unhealthy in what has historically been one of the cleanest rivers in the state. Option A is the right path for the Conservation Commission, DNR, the USFS, and especially the National Park Service to take.

To Dave Podgornik,

AmerenUE spent 103 million to clean up the Taum Sauk disaster and that was with a flood of relatively CLEAN water. All told they spent more than 170 million. Better to prevent the damage than pay to clean it up later.

— Rich Brown
2:39 pm June 30th, 2009

Is this a new policy running commentaries in the platform? If so, we hope to see equal time.

— jjk
4:42 pm June 30th, 2009

jjk, get your own newspaper, yapper!

Maybe if your views aren’t getting out, start a blog! We did it in March 2006, and now at http://www.dangerousintersection.org get 192,210 viewers a month.

— Tim Hogan
5:38 pm July 1st, 2009

wild horses were a big contributer, i remember. ride somewhere else and get rid of the wild ones. as for the yay-hoos, it’s part of the reason i don’t float much. when i do, i burn vacation days and go during the week, when the hoosiers aren’t there.

— workingdude
11:13 am July 2nd, 2009