No innovations in baseball?
“Freakonomics” author Stephen J. Dubner has an interesting post this week on innovations to make baseball more interesting. Last time we heard that kind of talk, the American League got the designated hitter rule. That’s not baseball as it ought to be.
Still, Mr. Dubner makes some interesting points. You can find his post here:
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/28/ideas-for-making-baseball-more-interesting/


(1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
John G. Carlton is an editorial writer who covers health care, science, the environment and public utilities. Before joining the editorial page, "Doc" was the newspaper's medical writer for four years. He has also worked at newspapers in Connecticut and New York. He's fond of heavy sarcasm and light anti-tank weapons. He lives in west St. Louis County with his wife, Martha Madigan, their daughter Ana and an overly enthusiastic Australian Shepherd dog, Savannah.
One of the “innovations” Dubner calls for is playing relief pitchers in the outfield for a batter or two, and then bringing them back to the mound to face a hitter. Cardinals fans will recall that Whitey Herzog did that 20 years ago, sticking righthanded reliever Todd Worrell in the outfield while he brought lefthander Ken Dayley in to face a lefthanded hitter or two (often Keith Hernandez and Darryl Strawberry of the Mets) and then calling Worrell back to mound.
Herzog would explain that he was fairly confident that Worrell and/or Dayley could catch a fly ball, but there some guys on his staff he wouldn’t take the gamble with.
As to baseball being boring, I quote the legendary sportswriter Red Smith: “Baseball is dull only to dull minds.”