Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.31.2008 11:59 am

Frank, Paul: “Legalize it”

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Marijuana leafIn April, Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) and Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) co-sponsored a resolution (H.R. 5843) to end federal penalties for Americans carrying fewer than 100 grams of marijuana. (There are actually now six other co-sponsors, including our own William Lacy Clay (D) from Missouri’s 1st Congressional District)

Yesterday, CNN reported on a press conference held by Frank to promote the legislation:

Current laws targeting marijuana users place undue burdens on law enforcement resources, punish ill Americans whose doctors have prescribed the substance and unfairly affect African-Americans, said Frank, flanked by legislators and representatives from advocacy groups.

“The vast amount of human activity ought to be none of the government’s business,” Frank said on Capitol Hill. “I don’t think it is the government’s business to tell you how to spend your leisure time.”

[...]“Smoked marijuana has not withstood the rigors of science — it is not medicine and it is not safe,” the DEA states on its Web site. “Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers.”

Allen St. Pierre, spokesman for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, likened Frank’s proposal — co-sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas — to current laws dealing with alcohol consumption. Alcohol use is permitted, and the government focuses its law enforcement efforts on those who abuse alcohol or drive under its influence, he said.

Other legislators also argued in favor of the the Frank-Paul proposal:

Reps. William Lacy Clay, D-Missouri, and Barbara Lee, D-California, said that in addition to targeting nonviolent offenders, U.S. marijuana laws unfairly target African-Americans.

Clay said he did not condone drug use but opposes using tax dollars to pursue what he feels is an arcane holdover from “a phony war on drugs that is filling up our prisons, especially with people of color.”

H.R. 5843 is currently still sitting in the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

This is, of course, not the first time legislation has been introduced to legalize marijuana. State-level ballot initiatives to decriminalize marijuana have been attempted in several states (Nevada, Alaska, Colorado and South Dakota), but have met with defeat. One would assume there’s little hope for a different outcome with this proposal, but its supporters are clearly hoping to spark a renewed nationwide debate over the issue.

**UPDATE: I thought it might be useful to provide some polling data on public support for the legalization of marijuana: A Gallup poll in October 2005 found that 36 percent of Americans believed marijuana should be legalized. 60 percent opposed legalization.

As for party affiliation, legalization was opposed by a majority across the political spectrum: 77 percent of Republicans, 59 percent of Democrats, and 52 percent of Independents.

Legalization of Marijuana by party affiliation

20 comments

Comments are closed.

So the real test of whether Alex is going through a “Libertarian phase” or whether he’s already a died-in-the-wool Republican is whether he agrees with Frank and Paul.

— Adam S
1:26 pm July 31st, 2008

What I find amusing about all of this, is that Bob Barr is the Libertarian Candidate. The same Bob Barr who was rated as one of the most conservative of the conservative Republicans in the 1990’s.

Of course weed like alcohol if over indulged may cause you to wake up with some strange bed-fellows.

— RHarnack
1:47 pm July 31st, 2008

Thanks for the heads up on this HR bill. The 2005 poll cited would lead readers to believe that the co sponsors of this bill are “out of the mainstream” of what Americans want. Nevermind that having 51% of a poll or even voters decide anything, while often called a “democracy” in action, is still mob rules mentality. The bottom line is that the federal government has overstepped its boundaries, made a huge overreach, etc. with draconian and hypocritical drug laws. The real culprits behind the curtain are big pharma who in no way shape or form want the public to be able to cultivate and self medicate ANY medicinal products without a cut going to themselves. Marijuana just happens to be a sustainable agri-crop that can be grown in every state in the union… plus keeping it illegal keeps the prices high for the drug dealers themselves. Big guvment, gotta love it, so efficient.

Take a look at where the drug war started… Richard Nixon’s “Blue Ribbon Committee”… another liberal move in republican “less government” garb.
http://www.csdp.org/publicservice/nixon06.htm

— Todd M
2:50 pm July 31st, 2008

Nice to know that 77% of Republicans believe that the government has the right to control an individuals body. Where’s that “small government” when you need it?

— Ed Dunkle
3:04 pm July 31st, 2008

I just love Democrats - is there really nothing these sleazebags will do to atrack the lowest common demoninator in our society. Let me guess, get the slimebags on drugs, on welfare, and then they will vote for us. And you guys complain about the corporatists?
P. S. Ron Paul is a Libertarian or Independent, not a Republican.

— A CENTRIST
3:21 pm July 31st, 2008

I nominate this as the dumb comment of the week:

“Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers.”

News flash to the DEA: Anything you say about marijuana is equally true about alcohol, but more so. I’ve never known anyone who drove under the influence of pot … after smoking a joint, you’re lucky if you can get them off the sofa, much less into their car to drive home.

The stupid thing about all this is that while indulging in the harmless relaxation of marijuana is a federal offense, I’ve seen people smoking a blunt on the Metro platform. I’ve often walked down the street and smelled it wafting from somebody’s yard. Yet those of us who have assets must keep away from it, because of federal forfeiture law.

One other problem - simply decriminalizing possession is insufficient. Under Missouri law, growing marijuana is a felony - even a single plant. Unless you legalize growing it for personal use, legalizing possession ends up making people purchase product of unknown original, from people who are committing a felony by trafficking in it.

FINALLY, a word about the Gallup poll (available at the link below). it’s important to note that the results varied significantly by age - even in the face of constant anti-drug propaganda, 47% of those between 18 and 29 support legalization, while only 22% of seniors support it. So while prohibition seems popular today, time is not on its side.

http://www.csdp.org/research/gallup_marijuana_2005.pdf

— Nick Kasoff
3:49 pm July 31st, 2008

I’m really disappointed. After all of the impassioned speeches I’ve seen on this site on behalf of “Freedom” and “government, stay out of my business”, are there really no conservatives who have the guts to say that the government shouldn’t regulate a drug that, as far as I can tell, has not been shown to be any more harmful than alcohol or cigarettes? Kinda makes it seem to me that the right-wingers who post on this site are far more committed to the Republican party, however corrupt it has become, than to any ideals such as small government.

— Adam S
3:52 pm July 31st, 2008

Whoops, I started my comment before Nick’s was up. I’m glad he stands on his principles. Any other real “small government” people out there? Alex?

— Adam S
4:33 pm July 31st, 2008

Ron Paul is the only real Republican on the stage. The rest are Republicrats, the oppose personal liberties, personal responsibility and accountability, limited government and sound free market financial policy. OF COURSE the DEA condemns the resolution to legalize marijuana, that’s their job security! And of course the neocons voted in favor of keeping it illegal, because that affords government more control over our lives, the same agenda that the “Democrats” have. The two parties are no longer two parties at all, they just disagree over the best way for Big Government to spend the money it is stealing from you and your grandchildren. Read the Constitution folks, this is exactly why the Revolutionary War took place. Next the Government will be telling us what we can or cannot have for dinner in our own homes and claiming the laws forbid us to eat anything that the FDA has deemed unhealthy for us!

— Brandy
5:59 pm July 31st, 2008

Though I never smoke it myself, I favor total legalization of marijuana since the harm and threat it poses does not rise to a level at which government intervention is justified.

— Bill Hannegan
11:33 pm July 31st, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All