Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.31.2008 11:59 am

Frank, Paul: “Legalize it”

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Marijuana leafIn April, Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) and Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) co-sponsored a resolution (H.R. 5843) to end federal penalties for Americans carrying fewer than 100 grams of marijuana. (There are actually now six other co-sponsors, including our own William Lacy Clay (D) from Missouri’s 1st Congressional District)

Yesterday, CNN reported on a press conference held by Frank to promote the legislation:

Current laws targeting marijuana users place undue burdens on law enforcement resources, punish ill Americans whose doctors have prescribed the substance and unfairly affect African-Americans, said Frank, flanked by legislators and representatives from advocacy groups.

“The vast amount of human activity ought to be none of the government’s business,” Frank said on Capitol Hill. “I don’t think it is the government’s business to tell you how to spend your leisure time.”

[...]“Smoked marijuana has not withstood the rigors of science — it is not medicine and it is not safe,” the DEA states on its Web site. “Legalization of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behavior, and drugged drivers.”

Allen St. Pierre, spokesman for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, likened Frank’s proposal — co-sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas — to current laws dealing with alcohol consumption. Alcohol use is permitted, and the government focuses its law enforcement efforts on those who abuse alcohol or drive under its influence, he said.

Other legislators also argued in favor of the the Frank-Paul proposal:

Reps. William Lacy Clay, D-Missouri, and Barbara Lee, D-California, said that in addition to targeting nonviolent offenders, U.S. marijuana laws unfairly target African-Americans.

Clay said he did not condone drug use but opposes using tax dollars to pursue what he feels is an arcane holdover from “a phony war on drugs that is filling up our prisons, especially with people of color.”

H.R. 5843 is currently still sitting in the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

This is, of course, not the first time legislation has been introduced to legalize marijuana. State-level ballot initiatives to decriminalize marijuana have been attempted in several states (Nevada, Alaska, Colorado and South Dakota), but have met with defeat. One would assume there’s little hope for a different outcome with this proposal, but its supporters are clearly hoping to spark a renewed nationwide debate over the issue.

**UPDATE: I thought it might be useful to provide some polling data on public support for the legalization of marijuana: A Gallup poll in October 2005 found that 36 percent of Americans believed marijuana should be legalized. 60 percent opposed legalization.

As for party affiliation, legalization was opposed by a majority across the political spectrum: 77 percent of Republicans, 59 percent of Democrats, and 52 percent of Independents.

Legalization of Marijuana by party affiliation

20 comments

Comments are closed.

Todd M. hit the nail on the head with the pharma comment. I have seen people stung out so bad on prescription pain meds in an attempt to manage chronic pain that it ruined them. It led to the death of my ex husband at age 49 in 07. Perhaps legal access to medical marijuana could lower drug abuse and addiction to prescription drugs. Pharmaceutical companies aren\’t going to go bankrupt. There will still be enough pill poppers to feed them and they continue doing what they do…raise prices.

Decriminalization for personal use, medical or not, would be a change for the better. I personally lost interest in using it several years ago, but I\’m sick of seeing people arrested, harmed, and killed over weed. Real criminals rape, rob, and murder. Some serve less time or escape justice, altogether. Where\’s the logic in that?

Whether it\’s legal, or not, it\’s not going away. Acceptance of it might make trying it less attractive to future generations. Removing the taboo would be beneficial in the long run.

Not all marijuana users fit the stereotype of pothead, stoner, loser, or whatever label attached. Some folks unwind after a long day of productive work with a joint. It\’s no different than having a drink at the end of the day. Responsible adults should have that choice without fear of imprisonment. Sure there are going to be the one\’s that fit the stereotype. Some will abuse it. But, so will alcoholics abuse alcohol. There will still be gambling addicts, sex addicts, junkies, food addicts, broken people with serious problems. Addiction to anything might lead to self destruction, imprisonment, or death, eventually. The mere possession of a small amount of pot shouldn’t put them there.

Besides medical benefits or personal enjoyment, hemp has so many other benefits that we need to utilize. It’s time for U.S. government and law enforcement to focus on capturing and punishing the real criminals. For way too long they’ve wasted time and money punishing marijuana users. Pull your heads out of your behinds and make a positive change. I don’t care if you are democrat, republican, libertarian, or anything breathing… Just say yes!

— Rebecca B
3:26 am August 1st, 2008

Actually, no one has ever died from marijuana use. The U.S. Federal Government says this about marijuana. The risk of addiction is less than for caffeine. Addiction is psychological only. Withdrawal is mild and short-lived as are side effects from use. (must people readily quit using, with no withdrawals). Plus, marijuana is readily available to kids with money from criminals. True control via re-legalization and lower costs would drive criminals out of the trade. Kids would not be able to get marijuana as easily from licensed merchants. Merchant non-compliance for age restrictions is only 10% and going down. Marchants who sell to kids can be arrested on the spot. It can takes years of police efforts, and money to arrest criminals. While kids continue to get and use any drug they want. Often, well healed criminals can afford to get off with little punishment. Do we want our kids to easily continue to get drugs? Or, do we want real controls and tax dollars to boot? Crime will go down with re-legalization. While, police can persue violent crimes. Which at this time have appallingly low clearance rates due to chasing after non-violent marijuana users. All good reasons to overturn our failed prohibition and it’s objectional evils.

— M Miteren
7:14 am August 1st, 2008

In my opinion, the only reason why the government haven’t legalized marijuana is because the can’t figure out a way to tax it. They want to make money from it just like they do with alcohol and cigarettes. Not everybody can make alcohol or start a tobacco field, but everyone can grow there own plants. This has been said through out this blog, but I’m going to say it again, people use marijuana for the same reasons they drink alcohol…for a nice buzz and chill out. Legalizing…”BUD”…as I like to call it…is long over due. Congress…MAKE IT HAPPEN!!!!

— Chico May
8:16 am August 1st, 2008

“the right-wingers who post on this site are far more committed to the Republican party, however corrupt it has become, than to any ideals such as small government.”

— Adam S

Alcohol kills more than marijuana, crack, heroin and cocaine combined.

— Andrew
4:44 pm August 1st, 2008

“…the only reason why the government haven’t legalized marijuana is because the can’t figure out a way to tax it.”

Actually, they would do it the same way they do cigarettes and booze. This might actually “save” RJR and a few other cigarette companies.

Just think if A-B had a marijuana “Bud”, they would have been buying InBev.;)

— RHarnack
8:00 pm August 1st, 2008

Wow, Barney Frank is ahead of his time. Unfortunately, it will be another two decades before it does get legalalized but thats only because this country will be bankrupt by then and there won’t be a choice.

They say the definition of insanity is to keep doing something over and over and expect something different each time.

Face it, we’ve lost the drug war and maybe its time to put all those resources into real solutions like treatment and education. However, the “prison/incarceration” industrial complex won’t let that happen.

— sally
11:09 pm August 1st, 2008

Another in a long list of ironies and hypocrisies. Marijuana grows freely from God’s earth. It’s a gift from Mother Nature, no different than wheat, or the coca plant. It exists for a reason.

Yet those who live, govern, rule, administer, bully, with their hand on the Bible, are essentially saying that the plant is evil and it’s their job to correct God’s mistake.

One can argue that sugar cane is more dangerous to society than “weed”, but that industry has lobbyists.

— morehouse
11:18 am August 2nd, 2008

I’ve got my hopes up for this bill!

I hate to see and hear about people sipping martini’s or having a beer and judging marijuana use. Most people know the truth but favor government control because of their own ignorance and ineptitudes. At least with marijuana, you know your high, when you drink you tend to think you are fine and can still do anything.

I am telling everyone I know to call their rep and tell them how they feel about this bill.

— Bob G
2:48 pm August 2nd, 2008

Hey, you twisted yapper!! Paul has an (R) after his name and that means Republican. All you fascists can’t stand it that sometimes, somewhere, somone’s not in goose-step with the latest KKKarl Rovian edicts.

— Tim Hogan
1:36 am August 3rd, 2008

Instead of publishing an old out of date poll, why not do a poll of your own.

All the other polls I have seen from this year and on this bill have a 98% yes versus 2% no to decriminalization.

Your polls are old and an old way of thinking.

— Chris
10:06 am August 4th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All