Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.06.2008 9:25 am

Mass transit and suburban home market

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

transitThere’s a connection, or so say the sources in this piece in the Washington Post:

Federal spending is about 4 to 1 in favor of highways over transit. Today, more than 99 percent of the trips taken by U.S. residents are in cars or some other non-transit vehicle, largely as a result of decades of such unbalanced spending.

The policies — building so many highways and building so many houses near those highways — have had a direct bearing on how and where people live and work. More Americans, 52 percent, live in the suburbs than anywhere else. The suburban growth rate exceeded 90 percent in the past decade.

But there’s been a radical shift in recent months. Americans drove 9.6 billion fewer highway miles in May than a year earlier. In the Washington area and elsewhere, mass transit ridership is setting records. Last year, transit trips nationwide topped 10.3 billion, a 50-year high.

Home prices in the far suburbs, such as Prince William and Loudoun counties, have collapsed; those in the District and inner suburbs have stayed the same or increased. A recent survey of real estate agents by Coldwell Banker found an increased interest in urban living because of the high cost of commuting.

Brookings says transportation costs are now second only to housing as a percentage of the household budget, with food a distant third.

The people are leading the revolution, but land-use experts wonder whether a government policy so etched into the American fabric will follow.

“When people bought homes, they punched the numbers and said can we afford the mortgage payment and taxes,” Katz said. “This new paradigm is going to have families being more deliberate about the cost of transportation spending and energy costs. That’s a new phenomenon in the United States. That will be the change that will change development patterns.”

Katz and others said high fuel prices will increase demand for transit-oriented development, where homes, townhouses and office buildings cluster around transit hubs that link jobs with population centers.

(Pictured: Jennifer Olmstead (left) Daughter, Sarah Baybeck and husband, Brady Baybeck, (right) walk to the MetroLink station in the Delmar Loop in 2005 from their home in the 6000 block of Washington Boulevard. The couple chose this location because of its proximity to the light rail system. The couple walks together in the mornings and travel opposite directions. Olmstead went southbound towards the city and Baybeck went northbound with daughter Sarah.–Photo By Dawn Majors/Post-Dispatch) 

6 comments

Comments are closed.

I have long been against using federal or state funds to build commuter highways. If St. Charles county needed 370 and the Page Extension, they should have paid for it with county funds.

But that doesn’t mean that running transit lines into Chesterfield and St. Peters isn’t a stupid idea. Subdivisions in these areas are built in a way that makes efficient transit service impossible. Expanding transit into these places will bankrupt your transit agency, and have no significant effect on traffic or the environment.

I once lived in Skinker-DeBalivier, and appreciated the same service that you show my old friends Sarah and Brady using. But that area has an urban street grid, which is designed for access to transit on arterial streets. It also has a higher population density than Chesterfield or Wildwood. Same can be said of the area of Ferguson where I live now. In order to continue to serve these areas, we need to freeze further expansion of Metrolink, and direct current resources toward maintaining and sustaining the great transit system we already have. That’s why those who use and love transit should be the first in line to vote against the Metro expansion tax they are proposing this fall.

See http://www.stoptheprop.com for more information.

— Nick Kasoff
10:58 am August 6th, 2008

I’m Nick Kassoff and I approved this message.

— Andrew
2:24 pm August 6th, 2008

I’ve been on both sides of the metrolink issue. I managed a hotel in St. Charles for a few years and would have loved to have had metrolink go by my hotel to provide a larger pool of employees to hire from. I also worked at Saint Louis Galleria when the Metrolink station opened on the other side of I-170 and saw the mix of customers change at the center..not necessarily for the better (this also happened when the metrolink station opened at Union Station years ago). I’m torn on further expansion of the system.

I would like to see more emphasis placed on putting in bike lanes throughout the city. We are starting to see a tremendous bike trail system which is good for biking/leisure enthusiasts…but we really need more urban bike paths. I live in Webster and work in Clayton and there is no good way to get here via bike.

— Logicprevails
2:45 pm August 6th, 2008

Brookings says transportation costs are now second only to housing as a percentage of the household budget, with food a distant third.

Brookings is in error. Taxes first, housing second, followed by transportation, food and waaay down the line, savings. Many of the taxes are hidden in fees and prices, but they still consume the largest portion of any household budget.

— A#
2:53 pm August 6th, 2008

The connection is an obvious one, once you think about it. Once we build homes that are spread out far from the city center, we make it unlikely that a person living in those suburbs will find or use mass transit. It’s just too expensive to cover all of that spread out territory with mass transit.

Something else usually comes with the suburban territory: an attitude that disparages mass transit. “It’s not just some WE do out here . . . it’s for poor folks.” This disparaging attitude is comcommitant with the out-of-control love affair so many Americans have with those cars, trucks and SUV’s that serve to both A) take their owners here-and-there and B)display their owners’ personalities and wealth.

What happens once the energy that enabled the creation of our sprawing suburbs is no longer cheap? We’re about to find out.

— Erich Vieth
10:34 pm August 6th, 2008

Eddie, Eddie, Eddie…
I live in Loudoun County Virginia and I object to you calling my beloved county a “far suburb”. Far from you perhaps, but if you ever tried to get from any point A to any point B out here you’d realize that you had “arrived”. There’s nothing but city out here any more.

We don’t need mass transit or city addresses… we need telecommuting!

Either way, thanks for thinking of us folk! You’re welcome anytime.

— David
10:46 pm August 8th, 2008