Children and the city

View into the plaza between school and Orpheum Theatre from the old Board of Education building. The plaza is a shared space between the school community and the public. Cristina Greavu.
A group of students from the Graduate School of Architecture and Design at Washington University showed off their thesis projects last month at a public forum in the community space on North Market Street in Old North St. Louis.
The program, styled “Reconsidering Saint Louis,” presented a sparkling collection of concepts for reusing space and structures throughout the metropolitan area.
One project proposed a research hub and terminal market at the old National City Stockyards for sustainable and organic foods. Another described how the U.S. Steel-Granite City Works could be transformed into a research center for efficient steel production. A third explained how a rail yard near the riverfront might become a rolling arts district using rail cars as studio space.
These ideas are theoretical and academic. So, at one time, were skyscrapers and iPods. But it is from ideas like this, and young scholars like this, that the future is born.
Among the students who exhibited their work was Cristina Greavu. She’s from Romania and came to the United States to attend Wellesley College and then Washington University, where she recently received masters’ degrees in architecture and urban design.
Ms. Greavu designed an elementary school downtown. The school would revolve around families with parents who work in the central business district. It would operate on a business clock, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., so parents could bring their children to school on the way to work and more readily break away to participate in school-day happenings.
She envisions an ideal site at the recently renovated public plaza to the north of the Old Post Office off Locust Street, at the heart of downtown. Sublime spaces, facilities and public institutions are at the front door or within walking distance. Broad southern exposure ensures classrooms are illuminated with natural light.
The school design — a four-story, 45,000-square-foot steel structure — would provide a safe environment for students and promote maximum interaction between the city and its children. The building’s exterior finishes are modest, clean and plain. They don’t compete with surrounding structures and make easily visible what is taking place inside the school and out.
School curricula and its educational approach would be influenced by the Reggio Emilia philosophy — a focus on hands-on parental and community support, and using the nearby surroundings as “third teachers.”
Ms. Greavu is moving to an architectural firm in New York City that does work for educational institutions.
She will spend a year there before returning to Romania. Her ambition is to find ways to “engage with traditionally disadvantaged populations.” She sees design work that involves schools as “a step in the direction of social responsibility.”
She emphasized that students benefit from being placed “in the middle of things.” But the benefits would flow outward as well. The central city’s fabric and vibrancy would be strengthened and enriched just as much by their presence.
Before Ms. Greavu leaves, Mayor Francis Slay should buy her lunch.


Eddie Roth writes about education, social justice, public safety, transportation, legal affairs and historic preservation. He joined the Post-Dispatch editorial page in 2008 after six years as an editorial writer with the Dayton Daily News. But he is not new to St. Louis. Eddie grew up in Webster Groves and south St. Louis County. He's a lawyer who for many years practiced with a downtown firm, and was active in civic affairs, including serving a term on the St. Louis Police Board. He and his wife, Jeanne, and their three daughters, Emily, Julia and Alice, live in the Shaw Neighborhood.
When it comes to community organizing, he endorses Quentin Crisp's advice: Rather than keeping up with the Joneses, it's better to pull them down to your level.
A downtown school is a nice idea. Of course, we already have one, the Ethel Hedgeman Lyle Academy, at 1509 Washington Avenue. And what this school does NOT do is serve the children of those who work downtown. There’s a simple reason why: Downtown workers, for the most part, don’t live in the city.
There is another reason why this would not be such a good idea: School is a social and community thing, and most children would prefer to go to school with neighbors. And we won’t even get into the problem of inducing suburban parents to send kids to the unaccredited SLPS …
Congratulations and thank you to Cristina Greavu and Eddie Roth. As a friend and admirer of Cristina, an author of several books on the Reggio Approach and a current student and teacher of sustainability education, I view Cristina’s project as fantastic possibility that could be real. I hope Mayor Slay does take Cristina to lunch and that a city school like this might put St. Louis in the position of leader in creating and supporting a new vision of 21st century schools that our world needs.
Those ideas are unrealistic, but very creative. Kudos to those students for coming up with some unique thoughts.
As for Ms. Greavu’s idea, again kudos. However, Nick is right. Most people would not want their kids going to school somewhere else, St Louis City or not. It is not a practical idea.
Louise, there is nothing wrong with a “new vision” of schools, but it ought to be a vision that makes sense, don’t you think?
A fresh approach to school design is cool, but what’s most refreshing is the reference to the Emilia philospohy of hands-on parental and community involvement. If parents aren’t involved in their child’s education, academic success is almost impossible.
Having been a student in a design field I understand the difficulty in coming up with an original thought. I applaud the originality presented by Cristina and thank Eddie for presenting them in a public forum.
Ideas, as Eddie mentioned form the future and I believe there might be a possibility in Cristina’s vision for a downtown school. I partially agree with Nick community participation in schools would be different in this case, but accreditation is an issue which can be resolved. But like Merc said, whats more important than the first hand involvement of the parents in a child’s education?