Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.14.2008 3:48 pm

Wash U. Law School dean defends his faculty

  • Email this
  • Print this

In a letter Wednesday afternoon to the Post-Dispatch, law school dean Kent Syverud took issue with comments attributed to Phyllis Schlafly in which she personally attacked law school faculty members opposed to her receiving an honorary degree from the university on Friday. The complete text of Syverud’s letter follows:

May 14, 2008


Phyllis Schlafly, a graduate of our law school who will receive an honorary degree from Washington University on Friday, today responded to critics of the degree in an interview in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Those critics included 14 members of the law faculty who signed a letter explaining why they were disappointed in the decision to honor Mrs. Schlafly. Her response:

“They are a bunch of bitter women,” she said of her detractors. “It was 25 years ago that we buried the equal rights amendment and they are still whining about it.” Her suggestion to them? “Get a life. Move on. Try to do something with your life.”

There has been much controversy over the decision to award Mrs. Schlafly an honorary degree. I am dean of the law school, and I understand the process of the University that produced this decision. I am also proud to be part of a great university dedicated to learning and ideas. I often don’t agree with some of the ideas expressed here - including ideas of alumni and faculty. But I admire a university where people take ideas seriously and examine them on their merits, and where they are civil and respectful of others, including those with whom they disagree. I don’t think honorary degrees should be restricted to those whose ideas are popular ones, on or off campus.

I do think all members of the university community should encourage civility and respect in discourse about ideas, even when the ideas are controversial ones. I did not sign the letter from law faculty. Nevertheless, I believe it was a thoughtful and careful effort to address the issue of whom a university should honor. The women and men who signed it - my colleagues - are neither bitter nor whiners, but rather committed teachers and scholars. They care about ideas, and they have poured their hard work into educating thousands of their students - including Mrs. Schlafly - with wonderful results. They don’t need to get a life, because they have already lived one worthy of respect.

I suspect Mrs. Schlafly did not mean to refer to the law faculty’s letter when she made her remarks. In any event, I hope all of us at a university could agree that arguments about ideas should wherever possible be about ideas, rather than converted into personal attacks.

Sincerely,
Kent Syverud

Dean

Ethan A.H. Shepley University Professor

Washington University School of Law

23 comments

Comments are closed.

We’re NOT whiners! *Sniff*

— Go_Fish
4:22 pm May 14th, 2008

Objection! They are whiners.

— flyover
4:46 pm May 14th, 2008

Go fish and flyover: How about using your real names or are you ashamed of your views?

The professors’ letter was right on the money, logical and well written. Mrs. Schlafly’s letter was whining and a personal attack.

How about the Chancellor’s decision to have Margaret Bush Wilson present the award? Brilliant idea-a decent attempt to defuse the situation-whoever thought that one up should get an honorary degree at next year’s commencement.

The person who nominated Ms. Schlafly on the Board ought to be ashamed of him or herself, not for the nomination, but for letting the University stew in this mess without having the guts to admit it and defend it.

Here is a suggestion that might make it win win for everyone. I’ll donate $1,000. to a scholarship fund in honor of Ms. Schlafly’s son if the member of the Board who nominated Schlafly will admit it and defend it-and I’ll offer to call on my class members (’70 and ‘74) to contribute also.

— Norman Pressman
5:01 pm May 14th, 2008

Hey Norm,
I will donate $1,000 (Not to Wash U, but a legitimate charity), if you will stop demanding the same thing every time you post here. Its getting old.

— flyover
5:19 pm May 14th, 2008

Breaking…Schlafly calls students at WashU “Losers” : http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/620003.html .

Thanks Wrighton!

— Adam
7:42 pm May 14th, 2008

Chancellor Wrighton has it right, “anguish” is what the WU community is feeling. I met him at the Eliot society dinner, and have been a supporter of WU as an alum from the time I was VP Queen in the summers of 1959-60 when WU saved my sanity, and where I became an activist against nuclear war.

I ache for our founder… I am distinguished alum of Mary Institute, the school founded for girls to learn well enough to attend WU. Rev. Eliot founded both schools, because he believed women could be anything they wanted to be, even before the Civil War in the US!!

I ache for the other Schlafly family who were my neighbors, and my Republican parents raised me to revere their activism around desegregation of schools, which started in the 1940s. Sad to say, basically Phyllis Schlafly is a segregationist as far as women being excluded from certain jobs.

Frankly, I am also dumbfounded at how anyone could honor someone who trades on dishonoring anyone! The committee simply did not do their homework.

Ms Schlafly gives conservatives a bad name! John Ashcroft, a known conservative, joined the ranks of hundreds of legislators and 40 some governors helping our campaign to make marital rape a crime in all 50 states, saying it was because they wanted no harm to come to women. We won in 1993 and we will be honored this July in Washington DC.

Ms Schlafly’s contention at Bates College March 28, 07 that “by getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don’t think you can call it rape”, is totally beyond the pale of civilized discourse. The wondrous students took her on, and the blogs were spot on!

She doesn’t even credit the source, a known misogynist jurist in 1736—Matthew Hale. By 1995, the delegates from all the countries at the official UN conference about women in Beijing resolved that women are allowed to choose when to have sex, although married. Bodily integrity is a basic human right. Many of the delegates were male. 182 countries got it? Why not Ms Schlafly..?

I have to say as a Free Speech Movement activist of 1964 in Berkeley, I support her right to speak on campus or anywhere. In fact, it helps air the issues, but honoring her, and no counter debate, is not educational.

Phyllis Schlafly’s crusade to”bury” the ERA was not effective, despite what she told the Post Dispatch today 14th May 2008! Why did they not do their homework!? US women deserve to be in the constitution! We are so far behind so many other countries.

If the Equal Rights Amendment were “buried 25 years ago”, why was she actively out there in the states which are trying to ratify it in the last 2 years? It is still alive in Congress and in 4 special states, including Missouri! See http://ERAcampaign.net

Don’t be fooled, please! She deliberately dishonors the entire human race by ghettoizing half of it, campaigning against domestic violence protections and denying that rape is not a family value!! Hats off to the faculty of the School of Social Work and the School of Law faculty and the terrific students.

Laura X (born Laura Rand Orthwein )
Founder/Director Women’s History Library/National Clearinghouse on Marital and Date Rape

— laura x (laura rand orthwein)
11:41 pm May 14th, 2008

There’s a real mainstream response.
Flyover-X

— flyover
5:59 am May 15th, 2008

yes flyover, most of mainstream America has moved beyond the stone age. we hope you will join us some day.

— Adam
8:39 am May 15th, 2008

That’s Flyover-X.

— flyover
9:02 am May 15th, 2008

Because Mr Pressman, as you’ve so ably shown here, including ones name on a blog comment doesn’t necessarily mean one has anything interesting to say.

“Don’t be fooled, please! She deliberately dishonors the entire human race by ghettoizing half of it, campaigning against domestic violence protections and denying that rape is not a family value!!”

Could you possibly be more irrational and shrill? Would love to know who exactly thinks rape is a family value. They should be avoided at all costs.

— Go_Fish
9:40 am May 15th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All