Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.14.2008 3:48 pm

Wash U. Law School dean defends his faculty

In a letter Wednesday afternoon to the Post-Dispatch, law school dean Kent Syverud took issue with comments attributed to Phyllis Schlafly in which she personally attacked law school faculty members opposed to her receiving an honorary degree from the university on Friday. The complete text of Syverud’s letter follows:

May 14, 2008


Phyllis Schlafly, a graduate of our law school who will receive an honorary degree from Washington University on Friday, today responded to critics of the degree in an interview in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Those critics included 14 members of the law faculty who signed a letter explaining why they were disappointed in the decision to honor Mrs. Schlafly. Her response:

“They are a bunch of bitter women,” she said of her detractors. “It was 25 years ago that we buried the equal rights amendment and they are still whining about it.” Her suggestion to them? “Get a life. Move on. Try to do something with your life.”

There has been much controversy over the decision to award Mrs. Schlafly an honorary degree. I am dean of the law school, and I understand the process of the University that produced this decision. I am also proud to be part of a great university dedicated to learning and ideas. I often don’t agree with some of the ideas expressed here - including ideas of alumni and faculty. But I admire a university where people take ideas seriously and examine them on their merits, and where they are civil and respectful of others, including those with whom they disagree. I don’t think honorary degrees should be restricted to those whose ideas are popular ones, on or off campus.

I do think all members of the university community should encourage civility and respect in discourse about ideas, even when the ideas are controversial ones. I did not sign the letter from law faculty. Nevertheless, I believe it was a thoughtful and careful effort to address the issue of whom a university should honor. The women and men who signed it - my colleagues - are neither bitter nor whiners, but rather committed teachers and scholars. They care about ideas, and they have poured their hard work into educating thousands of their students - including Mrs. Schlafly - with wonderful results. They don’t need to get a life, because they have already lived one worthy of respect.

I suspect Mrs. Schlafly did not mean to refer to the law faculty’s letter when she made her remarks. In any event, I hope all of us at a university could agree that arguments about ideas should wherever possible be about ideas, rather than converted into personal attacks.

Sincerely,
Kent Syverud

Dean

Ethan A.H. Shepley University Professor

Washington University School of Law

23 comments

Comments are closed.

Check was delivered yesterday–awaiting Mink confirmation

— flyover
8:12 am May 21st, 2008

So, where’s the beef?

— jjk
1:04 pm May 23rd, 2008

If you read the script of her interview and think we misunderstood, please think again…

May 7, 2008
Schlafly Reiterates View That Married Women Cannot Be Raped By Husbands
Last year, Phyllis Schlafly spoke on the campus of Bates College where , among other things, she “belittled the feminist movement as ‘teaching women to be victims,’ decried intellectual men as ‘liberal slobs’ and argued that feminism “is incompatible with marriage and motherhood.” She then went on to top herself by claiming that a married woman cannot be sexually assaulted by her husband, saying:
“By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don’t think you can call it rape.”
Needless to say, those views caused a bit of controversy … controversy that has now reemerged at Washington University in St. Louis when school officials decided to honor Schlafly with an honorary doctorate:
Washington University’s decision to bestow an honorary degree on conservative political activist and author Phyllis Schlafly has stirred outrage among some students and faculty.
Opponents of Schlafly’s honorary doctorate formed a group on the social-networking website Facebook and had 1,023 members as of Monday evening.
Apparently the students don’t think that Washington University should be honoring an immigrant-hating, UN-detesting, evolution-fighting, court-stripping, conspiracy-theorist anti-feminist hypocrite who blames the Virginia Tech massacre on the English Department – go figure.
But the university isn’t backing down … and neither is Schlafly, who granted an interview to a Washington University student newspaper where she complained that the protesting students have “too much extra time” on their hands and reiterated her view that wives cannot be raped by their husbands:
Could you clarify some of the statements that you made in Maine last year about martial rape?
I think that when you get married you have consented to sex. That’s what marriage is all about, I don’t know if maybe these girls missed sex ed. That doesn’t mean the husband can beat you up, we have plenty of laws against assault and battery. If there is any violence or mistreatment that can be dealt with by criminal prosecution, by divorce or in various ways. When it gets down to calling it rape though, it isn’t rape, it’s a he said-she said where it’s just too easy to lie about it.
Was the way in which your statement was portrayed correct?
Yes. Feminists, if they get tired of a husband or if they want to fight over child custody, they can make an accusation of marital rape and they want that to be there, available to them.
So you see this as more of a tool used by people to get out of marriages than as legitimate-
Yes, I certainly do.

— MammaMia
3:04 pm May 26th, 2008

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All