Hate crimes show disturbing increase
Two troubling reports surfaced this week. One was about an increase in hate crimes against Hispanics, immigrants and people perceived to be immigrants; the other was about an increase in murders of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.
The Washington Post reported on the first, about immigrants. Read it here.
From the Washington Post story:
U.S. civil rights leaders said yesterday that an increase in hate crimes committed in recent years against Hispanics and people perceived to be immigrants “correlates closely” to the nation’s increasingly contentious debate over immigration.
Hate crimes targeting Hispanic Americans rose 40 percent from 2003 to 2007, the most recent year for which FBI statistics are available, from 426 to 595 incidents, marking the fourth consecutive year of increases.
The Associated Press reported on the second. Read it here.
From the AP story:
The number of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people killed in bias-motivated incidents increased by 28 percent in 2008 compared to a year ago, according to a national coalition of advocacy groups.
Last year’s 29 killings was the highest recorded by the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs since 1999, when it documented the same number of slayings, according to a report released Tuesday by the coalition.
“What we’re also seeing, more disturbingly, is the increase in the severity of violence,” said Sharon Stapel, executive director of the New York City Anti-Violence Project, which coordinates coalition.
Stapel theorized that at least some of last year’s violence was backlash against issues that arose during the during the presidential campaign. She cited debates about same-sex marriage, the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, and federal legislation that would ban employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity as possible flash points.
The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund issued a report that faulted anti-immigrant rhetoric in the media and mobilization of extremist groups on the Internet. The conference said that some groups advocating for tighter immigration laws have invoked “the dehumanizing, racist stereotypes and bigotry of hate groups.”
Yesterday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder called on Congress to enact hate crime legislation. On Monday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid met with advocacy groups to discuss expanding hate crime legislation to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, Fox news reported.
After the killing of abortion provider Dr. George Tiller, many pundits claimed such acts can be attributed, at least partly, to inciteful speech by radicals and right-wing personalities. The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund, which issued the report on the violence against immigrants and Hispanics, seemed to imply as much with the statement:
“The increase in violence against Hispanics correlates closely with the increasingly heated debate over Comprehensive Immigration Reform and an escalation in the level of anti-immigrant vitriol on radio, television, and the Internet. While reasonable people can and will disagree about the parameters of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, in some instances, the commentary about immigration reform has not been reasonable; it has been inflammatory.”
The report (read it here) said “… the spate of racially-motivated hate crimes and violence against minorities and immigrants that occurred before and after Election Day makes clear that a final victory over prejudice and racial hostility remains elusive.”
What do you think is driving the increase in this sort of violence? What can be done about it?


Jamie Riley is the P-D letters editor and gatekeeper of the letters blog. Before joining the editorial page in May 2005, she was a reporter and page designer. Jamie lives in University City with her husband, Charles, daughter, Elise, and the world's best Jack Russell terrier, Logan, better known as Stinky.
I wish our politicians would worry more about murders and violence in our inner cities and less about catagorizing murder and violence in order to fill an agenda.
Is killing someone because they are gay really more violent than killing someone because you want their tennis shoes?
29 killings all of last year? Come on, St. Louis could beat that in a month.
jmas, hit the nail on the head. Well said.
A crime is a crime folks. I can’t find a logical way to determine the thought process of a criminal committing any crime.
Will one get a lesser sentence by killing a non-protected minority while shouting “I love you” than the white supremicist shouting “white power?”
jmas - Actually the most homicides in a month recently in St. Louis city was 22 in June of 2008. And I’m guessing most of those were “black on black” crimes, which isn’t a hate crime.
And I’m guessing most of those were “black on black” crimes, which isn’t a hate crime.
— Kevin Campbell
4:53 pm June 17th, 2009
Why not? Doesn’t killing someone have to contain some level of hate? Why is a black-on-black murder any less worthy of punishment than a anyone-on-insert chosen minority?
Murder is murder regardless of what the perp was feeling at the time.
Just turn on CNN( Lou Dobbs) or Fox News, (Glen Beck or O’Reilly and listen to their daily rants,against these groups. This type of inflammatory,rhetoric pushes some wingnuts to take violent action.
“This type of inflammatory,rhetoric pushes some wingnuts to take violent action.”—Roger—
Does that then include the “green” groups like Earthfirst, who firebomb new developments? Then following this logic; would libs pushing the green agenda be responsible?
Or the gang-bangers who act out what they hear in popular music; are the record producers responsible? The musicians?
How about innocent children being thrown out like trash as a means of birth-control; can we hold libs responsible?
“Glitterati”, such as Letterman, et.al., are they responsible for statutory rape?
Where does the silliness end? When did a person being responsible for his actions, become a person being responsible for what he says…or thinks?
Roger,
You mean like Keith Olberman, Michael Moore, Louis Farrakhan, Al Franken, Jeanne Garolalo, and so on.
Your a hypocrite.
Roger,
Examples?
Murder is murder. We already have laws against it. Does this make a killer even more guilty?
“Amazed”, I don’t like talking directly to others on these posts, but you are hands-down, the most obtuse person I encounter.
Hate crimes have everything to do with perception and less to do with reality. The reason that they are more concerning is because of their possible viral effect.
A black kid killing another for his tennis shoes has more to do with a cultural reality where maintaining eye contact for more than a second can get you into trouble. The streets are meaner than what you and most of the other posters here can imagine. That kid is not thinking “I’m gonna kill that guy because he’s a ( blank ), therfore, it is not a “hate crime”. The guy that goes out and kills a Sikh after 9/11 ( this did happen ) because he’s a “towel head” is committing a hate crime because not only is he acting out of misperception, but because of how his actions may affect society as a whole.