Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.22.2008 9:01 pm

Friday editorials: Failing the troops

  • Email this
  • Print this

vets_reflect_opt.jpg

Disturbing new evidence emerged last week that the Department of Veterans Affairs continues to provide shoddy mental health care for soldiers and Marines returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Lack of effective screening, delayed care and denied diagnoses add up to a new kind of “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that is completely unacceptable.
• A federal report released last September criticized the VA for a “lack of early identification techniques” to detect veterans’ mental health problems.
• VA facilities around the country are short about 3,800 mental health workers, including 1,400 doctors. Professionals at many facilities are working overtime, yet returning veterans continue to face long waits for services and even longer waits for diagnosis and benefits.
According to documents filed in a federal suit in San Francisco, more than 85,000 veterans faced a wait of longer than 30 days for mental health care as of April. Waiting times for decisions relating to service-connected disability compensation stretch into years.
• Repeated deployments to a war zone where there are no front lines have led to an overwhelming need for care. A RAND Corp. report released this month estimates that as many as one in five servicemen and women returning from Iraq and Afghanistan suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression. With 1.64 million deployed so far, that puts the number of veterans in need of care at about 300,000.

The latest evidence that they’re not getting the care they need came in an e-mail released last week. It was written by Norma J. Perez, the PTSD coordinator at a VA facility in Texas.
Because the facility is seeing more of what Ms. Perez described as “compensation-seeking veterans,” she urged mental health professionals there to “refrain from giving a diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) straight out.”
A diagnosis of PTSD would qualify veterans for lifetime medical care, instead of the five years made available to all combat veterans. And it would make them eligible for at least some disability compensation.
Instead of diagnosing PTSD, Ms. Perez asked that therapists “consider a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder, R/O (ruling out) PTSD.” Veterans with adjustment disorder generally are not eligible for disability payments.

That callous disregard of veterans’ rights is of a piece with the administration’s entire approach to war. It sent troops into combat with inadequate body and vehicle armor, issued so-called stop-loss orders that forced them to serve beyond the expiration dates of their contracts and repeatedly sent them to combat zones.
They came home to discover that the benefits and care they were promised either were not available or required extended and expensive waits. Even worse, the military and VA have tried to “manage” reality by denying it.
In April, lawyers for a veterans’ advocacy group released e-mails written by Dr. Ira Katz, chief of mental health at the VA. Under a subject line of “Shhh,” Dr. Katz revealed that the number of suicides by returning veterans was far higher than the VA publicly had acknowledged. He fretted about the implications if the real numbers — 1,000 suicide attempts a month — got out.
It’s not the public reaction to 12,000 suicide attempts a year or the cost of compensating servicemen and women for PTSD that should worry VA officials. It’s the fact that veterans, having already risked their lives in combat, are losing their futures to the unseen wounds of battles that ended long ago.

12 comments

Comments are closed.

The latest evidence that they’re not getting the care they need came in an e-mail released last week. It was written by Norma J. Perez, the PTSD coordinator at a VA facility in Texas.
Because the facility is seeing more of what Ms. Perez described as “compensation-seeking veterans,” she urged mental health professionals there to “refrain from giving a diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) straight out.”

Is the Post editorial board more qualified on PTSD than Norma Perez? We absolutely must help every veteran with a real case of PTSD, but not everyone who comes in the door.

A worthwhile reading on this subject is “Posttraumatic Stress Disorder And The Non-Combat Veteran” by David Barker, © AMVETS Department of Ohio 2002. This is available on the Internet.

— Senior citizen
11:43 pm May 22nd, 2008

“That callous disregard of veterans’ rights is of a piece with the administration’s entire approach to war. It sent troops into combat with inadequate body and vehicle armor,”

How come we never hear from the PD that congress — and plenty of democrats in congress — voted to send the troop to combat also? It seems that if the presidency was/is at fault, congress share equal blame for this. And surely the initial lack of proper equipment has nothing to do with cutbaks in the military made during the Clinton years. Although I will say that not outfitting our troops with proper gear is horrible and should never happen regardless of the reason.

— GTB
6:49 am May 23rd, 2008

Regarding PTSD….a short poem I wrote.

If nightmares and dreams could be bottled like wine,

I’d send you a crate, vintage Tet 68,

So you could share some of mine.

— Old Sarge
7:41 am May 23rd, 2008

Without meaning to fault their brave efforts, is there a documented input as to the percentage of today’s veterans who actually experience close combat? Many in our Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard, and support personnel never do (Yes, we have Coast Guard people in the Middle East).

As to adequacy of body armor, it is well known that early body armor was not as good as today’s, and some unused armor deteriorated due to age. Even today’s armor is hot and heavy, so some of our people don’t wear full armor. Years ago, we lost people in Somalia because they only wore the front half of their heavy armor and got shot in the back (David Hackworth - “Hazardous Duty”). Even modern ceramic armor can’t stop a straight-on hit from the low-powered AK-47 cartridge.

— Bob H
9:00 am May 23rd, 2008

If the feds can’t competently manage legitimate, critical obligations such as veteran care, why do the government worshipers such as the PD editorial board push to expand federal powers into ever-expanding areas in violation of the Tenth Amendment? The waste, corruption, and incompetence of the federal government are already completely out of control and beyond our comprehension. What could possibly justify more usurpation of powers and resources by the bureaucracy?

— Bb
10:04 am May 23rd, 2008

Old Sarge,

I liked your poem (and not just because my father was an Old Sarge — he retired from the Air Force as a Chief Master Sgt. in 1970).

A few years ago (2005), I interviewed a guy who had flown in the same bomb group as my father during World War II. His war had ended 60 years earlier. But he still had vivid enough nightmares that his wife knew if he began thrashing about in bed, she should stay well clear.
He had been a rear gunner on a B-17. He wouldn’t tell me directly what he dreamed about. My guess is that he was struggling to make his way forward to the escape hatch so he could put on his parachute and bail out. His wife said he was still plenty strong enough to kick out that rear hatch — she had the bruises to prove it.

— John G. Carlton
10:43 am May 23rd, 2008

There you go Bb. Put Republicans in office who do nothing but use the state as an apparatus to help their friends and business interests, and then when its all over start crying about how we need to lower taxes because of “government inefficiency.”

— Adam
11:01 am May 23rd, 2008

This is indeed a problem. But the shortage of mental health professionals isn’t unique to the VA. Try finding a pediatric psychiatrist that is taking new patients.

— Nick Kasoff
12:29 pm May 23rd, 2008

Adam… you are evidently not familar with my other postings. The Republican Party is just as guilty as the Democrat Party of selling out to the special interest groups. The partisan bickering serves both well as a diversion from their atrocious behavior. Parasites and perverts on the left, preachers and plutocrats on the right. Neither side really cares about you as long as they stay on the gravy train.

— Bb
1:27 pm May 23rd, 2008

I looked at the e-mail and the Veterans for Common Sense report (I’ll read the Rand report over the week-end).

I have friends who served in VietNam, one of whom is a nurse who got hit with mortar fragments and just this past year (30 years later) finally got someone at the VA who said that her neck had been fractured. When it happened she was told it wan’t serious and went back to work shortly afterward.

The VA was okay for providing long-term care, but it was not set up to deal with the types of injuries and PTSD cases coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan, I doubt that there are too many facilities that are. The expectation is that military hospitals and facilities should be the places service personnel and veterans can expect to receive treatment.

I have been a war protestor and advocate of non-violence my whole adult life. I abhor war and the perceived need to go to war. I also think that those who actively and willingly serve in the armed forces should be taken care of by the country that asked them to fight. This is not an occasion for “bottom-line” thinking.

— RHarnack
2:29 pm May 23rd, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All