Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.19.2008 9:01 pm

Tuesday editorials: Broken hearts

broken_heart_opt.jpg

The numbers are chilling:
Women in Jefferson County are 17 percent more likely to be hospitalized for heart and circulation problems than those elsewhere in Missouri.
Women in St. Francois County are 38 percent more likely to die from heart disease.
Women in St. Louis have twice the rate of preventable hospitalization for congestive heart failure of other Missouri women.

It comes as no real surprise, then, that the American Heart Association named St. Louis among the nation’s least heart-friendly big cities for women. Only Nashville was worse. We’d come in very high on a list of least heart-friendly big cities for men, too.
St. Louis has some of the nation’s finest hospitals and doctors. But as demonstrated by the rate of preventable hospitalizations for congestive heart disease, we also have plenty of health problems.
Preventable hospitalizations are those that could have been avoided if the patient had received care and medication earlier. As Post-Dispatch medical writer Blythe Bernhard reported this week, many people in the St. Louis region don’t eat right, many smoke and they rarely exercise. All are factors that increase the risk of heart and circulation problems.
But there are also significant numbers of people who have no health insurance who cannot afford to see a doctor or fill a prescription. As a result, they put off addressing their health concerns, which means they’re often much sicker when they finally get care.
One of the missed opportunities of the legislative session that ended last week was the failure to extend health insurance to working parents with poverty-level incomes. Most of those parents are single mothers. They can’t afford to buy health insurance on their own, and it’s not offered to them through their jobs.
The heart association study looked only at metropolitan areas. But many rural counties in Missouri and Southern Illinois have even higher rates of heart disease.

High rates of hospitalization and premature death are costly for all of us, not just the families of those who fall ill. They drive up hospital prices and insurance rates and result in higher business costs through absenteeism and lost productivity.
Many places that ranked high in the heart association’s survey, such as Minneapolis, have taken aggressive steps to encourage exercise and prevent disease. The St. Louis region needs larger, more coordinated health promotion efforts to change eating habits and encourage exercise.
Meanwhile, women can and must take steps to reduce the individual risks within their control. They should educate themselves about the symptoms of heart disease — some of which are different from those experienced by men. And they should follow their doctor’s advice to quit smoking, exercise more and, if prescribed, regularly take medicine to reduce cholesterol and control high blood pressure.
Heart disease and heart attacks already have taken a large toll on our region. All of us — women and men — must work together to prevent new heart disease and the heartbreak it causes.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 2 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
6 comments

Comments are closed.

The editors identify preventable hospitalizations from heart disease which boils down to noncompliance with medications. A minority of patients do not take medications because they were never prescribed, but it would be safe to assume most of the cases identified were due to patients not taking medications that were prescribed.

You may say some people cannot afford their medications. I would say that is not true. Most of the medications that have a large impact on measurable endpoints of heart disease are generic and can be bought for <$5 per month and most patients need no more than 3 medications less than the cost of lunch which many of these patients ought to skip anyway.

All of the people with preventable admissions to hospitals should take care of themselves if they want to improve their health. Whenever the PD editorial board says something like “The St. Louis region needs larger, more coordinated health promotion efforts to change eating habits and encourage exercise” it doesn’t mean they plan to start or join a private organization to help with the problem — they mean they want to take your money and give it to someone else.

— John Deal
10:37 pm May 19th, 2008

First of all they are NOT single women with children.
There are either divorced women or UNmarried women with children. I am the first category.

I cannot afford health insurance with my company that offers it… Too expensive. So I have to go through another health plan Beechtree,com for somewhat insurance. For me and my daughter, it costs me $300.00 a month.
But I make too much money for State aid. I make $9.00/Hr. I do own my home. No, not really, the bank still owns my home. Whoops, I have a mortgage. $509.00 a month.

Crunch the numbers. Do I eat? Not a whole lot.

The Medical community has problems dealing with Women’s heart problems because our symptoms are different than men’s

Aint our problem…. Doctors LISTEN TO US!!!

— Maggie
11:42 pm May 19th, 2008

Here is a hint to cut down on healthcare expenses ladies. Purchase birth control and stop having babies without husbands helping you to support and take care of them. Think of those children, not yourselves!

— A CENTRIST
8:38 am May 20th, 2008

Maggie,

Thanks for your comment. I think your experience mirrors that of many women in our region and our state. One common characteristic of “affordable” health insurance is high deductibles that discourage patients from seeing a doctor for what they consider routine care. In most cases, “routine” means something that’s not bleeding or immediately life-threatening.

Many working people also have sporadic coverage. They may work for a few years at a job that provides coverage, then go without it for a few years after they change jobs. They’re often afraid to talk about ongoing symptoms for fear insurance companies will decide they’re a “pre-existing condition” that isn’t covered.

— John G. Carlton
11:22 am May 20th, 2008

Maggie,

Thanks for your comment. I sympathize with your difficulty in providing the necessities for yourself and your daughter. Unlike Mr. Carlton, I would encourage you to see your doctor regularly if you can afford it. I realize you often have to make difficult decisions about whether to purchase food or health care for yourself and your daughter. I am confident in your ability to make wise decisions if you consider them carefully.

Just so you know, my mother once made about the same as you (about half as much actually but in the early 80s) with four children, but through her hard work and attending college, she set an excellent example for my brother and sisters and I. Her commitment to our education led to my becoming a physician and my brother and sisters going to college. Two of them are now getting MBA’s.

— John Deal
5:39 pm May 20th, 2008

Mr. Carlton,

While I sympathize with Maggie’s difficulties, I believe your use of her difficulties to advance your political agenda is deplorable. Maggie seems to be working hard, buying a home and provinding for herself and her daughter. For these reasons I beleive she is a great person. She is not asking for a handout. You attempt take away her integrity and demean her hard work by taking from others that which she can and is doing on her own.

Your proposal for universal health care that would be taken from a few wealthy people and taken by many who say they “cannot afford it” is flawed on many levels. First it robs the integrity of people like Maggie who work hard to provide for themselves and their families. Second, paying for helath care makes it more likely patients will coomply with the recommendations of their physicians — there are many studies that show if a patient has to pay for their care, they are more likely to take medications or otherwise follow a physcians orders. The most important argument, however, is that none of us have the right to force our neighbor to pay for something for us. That is assault and is no different than mugging our neighbor.

— John Deal
6:17 pm May 20th, 2008