Yes on Proposition Y
Proposition Y on the Aug. 5 primary ballot asks city and county voters how they’d like to pay for $275 million worth of repairs and upgrades to their sewers: With cash up front or by spreading the payments out over 20 or 30 years?
Make no mistake: The work will be done, and the money will be spent. Courts have ruled that MSD bills are “fees” not “taxes” and are not subject to Missouri’s Hancock Amendment, which requires voter approval of tax increases. The only question is how they want to pay, not whether.
A yes vote on Prop Y will authorize MSD to issue bonds, backed by sewer fees, to cover the cost of the repairs. If voters approve, the average homeowner will pay $2.99 more a month in sanitary sewer charges by 2011. If they reject the measure, monthly bills will jump by $11.05.
MSD has embarked on a five-year, $662 million project to partially modernize an ancient sewer system that dumps raw sewage into our streams every time it rains hard. Parts of the system date to the 1850s. Some areas of downtown St. Louis still have sewer lines made of wood.
MSD also wants to ease drainage problems in the suburbs, such as a wandering creek that threatens to swallow houses in the Pepperdine subdivision in southwest St. Louis County.
Originally, MSD opted for a pay-as-you-go scheme in which rates would rise quickly but avoid the interest payments that come with borrowing. Business groups protested, as did the AARP, representing older people, and the anti-poverty group ACORN.
So the agency opted instead to ask voters for permission to borrow part of the money and spread the payments over 20 or 30 years. In effect, the plan would pass part of the cost on to our children. Depending on how long it takes to pay off the bonds, the interest charges would add $147 million to $227 million to the cost of the project.
Borrowing for short-term needs usually is not a good idea. Borrowing for long-term infrastructure needs is different. If the system is built correctly, our children and grandchildren will be using MSD’s system when they’re grown.
Before the repair program started, sanitary sewer rates averaged $22.38 for that mythical average homeowner. In January, the rates jumped to $25.74. If the bond issue is approved, they’ll go to $28.73 by 2011. If the bond issue fails, they’ll go to $36.79.
Remember: The sanitary sewer charge, for handling waste water, is only one part of the sewer bill. The second part is the storm sewer charge, for handling rainfall, and those fees went up this year, too. The old flat fee of 24 cents per customer was changed to a system that bills customers based on how much of their property is “impermeable surface.” The average residential customer now is paying $3 a month for storm water service.
It’s true that MSD has a history of cost overruns on construction jobs and that MSD’s rate commission is heavily influenced by the construction industry. Its interests don’t always coincide with those of the average citizen.
Still, the system needs an upgrade badly. Dumping sewage into the river is not acceptable. We’ll have to pay for it, and so will our grandchildren. Vote YES on Proposition Y.


We’ve been told that our sewer bills will ultimately jump to $100 a month. This has already happened elsewhere in the country.
The “problem” with occasional leakage of sewage during heavy storms has never been an issue in the past. Now, a new EPA mandate is going to bring a crushing burden to every resident of St. Louis. Renters, your rent WILL go up to pay for this, your landlord won’t just eat the cost.
What is needed is a rollback of the EPA mandate. There are far better ways, from a public health perspective, to spend $100 per household per month. Call and write your congressman!
If MSD charges are not a tax and they profit from their fees shouldn’t they, like other businesses pay for upgrades to their system?
Try less than $9 a month/per household average…not $100. (not to mention less total $ over the long haul.) I think that the aging infrastructure, and EPA concerns are valid. Case in point, a walk along a certain “river” that flows from Forest Park and wraps around the southern half of the city/county and the STENCH that often greets you. Or how about creeks and run-offs, throughout STL County, that, with recent excessive rain, are washing away property, up to the foundations of houses.
Why pay more in the long run with interest charges and lawyer fees etc?
Why would you get a 40 year mortgage, when you can get a 15 year mortgage for a couple dollars more a month? We apparently HAVE to pay for it either way! I know this is the unpopular view, but it seems no one else is taking it. Please discuss…
so what happens once all is paid off does the bill go back down??? I know once my house id paid off the payments stop, but will this extra payment continue to line the pockets of the msd board, or will the payments cease..