Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
08.03.2008 9:02 pm

MoDOT: Risky business

  • Email this
  • Print this

cd_cg_modot_inspector4_opt.jpgWith the safety of motorists on the line, not to mention $535 million in taxpayers’ money, you’d think the Missouri Department of Transportation would be checking every weld, bolt and cubic foot of concrete in the U.S. Highway 40/Interstate 64 reconstruction project.
But as Elisa Crouch of the Post-Dispatch reported last week, MoDOT is allowing its contractors to approve their own work. MoDOT’s own inspectors will “audit” only about 10 percent of the inspections done by the construction contractors.
The reason: It’s cheaper that way. MoDOT saves the expense of hiring its own inspectors. Besides, the free market orthodoxy of the Republican administration in charge in Jefferson City argues that the market eventually will sort out problems without government involvement.
Perhaps so, but it hasn’t worked in Washington (lead paint in children’s toys, beef recalls, unusable Coast Guard patrol boats), and it’s problematic for Highway 40. Cheaping it out on inspections is like riding on bald tires. The savings can’t justify the risk.

The reason is obvious: Contractors have a financial incentive to approve their own work. Do-overs raise costs, and contractors face penalties if a project isn’t completed by deadline. Inspectors working for the contractors know this. Honest though they may be, they also know the financial interests of their employers.
The consequences of poor design and construction can go beyond bumpy pavement. In Boston, shoddy installation caused concrete ceiling panels to collapse in a new highway tunnel, killing a woman in 2006. A year ago this week, an interstate highway bridge fell into the Mississippi River in Minneapolis, killing 13 people.
Ed Hassinger, MoDOT district engineer, says the state didn’t want to hire more inspectors only to fire them when the project ends. Hiring a consulting firm to do the inspections “might have been a cost issue.” Mr. Hassinger says he’s confident the contractors are doing high-quality work.
In Illinois, all projects are inspected by state employees or consultants hired by the state, says Bill Frey, project implementation engineer with the Illinois Department of Transportation. That’s the way it usually has been done in Missouri. But the Highway 40 project is operating on the design/build model, in which private firms both design and build the project, taking over some of the work normally done by state employees.
The concept has its merits. But inspections should remain a state responsibility.

2 comments

Comments are closed.

You were very kind to MoDOT in your editorial. Strange things happen in the design of anything, and the actual construction of it. I have never seen a design made without an error, or construction without without a flaw. The time to eliminate as many errors as possible is when it is being designed and built.

Let me give one example. I, per chance, drove by a high school with a cantilevered covered walkway from the street to the front door. I called the Principal and told him to get the snow off the roof or it would collapse. He told me to take care of my business and he would take care of the School’s business. I hand delivered a “letter to the Editor” to the ADN. It was in the next mornings newspaper. The covered walkway crashed to the ground at 2:30 pm the day the letter appeared. It killed the postman who was delivering the mail. If it had been 35 minutes later it would would have killed LOTS of students.

It cost the school district over $5,000,000 the postman’s death.

My point? The more eyes that are watching design, construcion, and workmanchip, the better.

— johnh
6:42 am August 4th, 2008

If this is the case, why wasn’t language written into the initial contract stating that that contractors are responsible for any flaws in construction say for a period of 15 years? If contractors knew they would be responsible for any problems that came up down the road there may be an incentive to spend more time up front and during the construction phase making sure things went as planned.

Im not opposed to workers checking their own work, it’s one of the hallmarks of a Lean process. I’m sure the contractors on the I-64 project are following thru with the proper inspection.

“Ed Hassinger, MoDOT district engineer, says the state didn’t want to hire more inspectors only to fire them when the project ends.”

Hahahahaha. Funny. Put them to work on existing bridge inspections in the area, especially the city. Plenty of work there.

— AJ
11:38 am August 4th, 2008