Friday editorial: Health care buyer beware
On the campaign trail and during their convention, Republicans have touted private enterprise as the solution to America’s health care crisis — despite evidence that within the government’s Medicare program, private enterprise is causing more problems than it’s solving.
Exhibit A is the $8.5 billion in extra payments that taxpayers will make this year to private insurance companies that cover some elderly Medicare patients.
The extra payments — over and above what it costs for traditional Medicare coverage — average nearly $1,000 for each person enrolled in a so-called Medicare Advantage plan that private insurance companies sell. Between 2004 and 2008, those extra payments added almost $33 billion to Medicare’s costs, according to a recent review by the non-partisan Commonwealth Fund.
Exhibit B: The baffling and opaque marketing materials that private companies are using to sell stand-alone Medicare prescription drug plans. Eighty-five percent of the marketing materials fail to meet federal standards for fairness and clarity, according to a recent inspector general’s report. The result: customers don’t know what they’re buying.
Some background: In 2003, the Republican-controlled Congress passed a Medicare prescription drug benefit that greatly expanded the role of private health insurance companies in the federal health program for the elderly.
Only private insurance companies are allowed to offer drug coverage under that law. They do so through stand-alone plans or through Medicare Advantage policies that combine drug benefits with other traditional Medicare coverage.
Participation by private insurance companies was supposed to provide “competition” for traditional Medicare. In theory, that would be a fine idea.
But the reality is that this “competition” has come at a steep cost for taxpayers. That’s because Congress added extra fees to entice private companies to “compete.”
About one of every five Medicare participants now is enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan, which costs about 12 percent more per enrollee than traditional Medicare. The fastest-growing kind of Medicare Advantage plan, called a private fee-for-service plan, costs an average of 19 percent more than traditional Medicare.
Extra payments to private insurance companies have jumped from $3.9 billion in 2004 to $8.5 billion this year. With so much money at stake, insurance companies have cranked up the advertising pressure, often in misleading ways. People with mental disabilities and dementia have been sold Medicare coverage they didn’t need and don’t want.
Federal and state governments have begun to crack down on high-pressure sales tactics used to sell Medicare Advantage plans. Insurance commissioners in at least 39 states have received complaints about such sales tactics, which are illegal.
Congress twice tried to cut the overpayments last year and direct the money to expand health insurance for children. President George W. Bush vetoed both bills. He threatened to veto another attempt to cut the overpayments this year.
The federal government is obliged to closely monitor private insurance companies that market to Medicare enrollees to ensure that they meet their legal obligations. But audit after audit has shown it has failed to do so.
Medicare exists to provide health insurance to millions of elderly Americans who either couldn’t obtain or couldn’t afford it otherwise. There are legitimate concerns about the program’s costs, especially with baby boomers reaching retirement age.
But if Congress and Mr. Bush truly were concerned about cutting costs, why make extra payments to private insurance companies? If they are concerned about protecting the elderly, why not enforce existing regulations requiring that marketing materials be complete, accurate and understandable?
Under the Bush administration, Medicare has become a subsidy program for private insurance companies that pressure seniors to sign up for overpriced coverage.
Now, the people who brought lax oversight and overpayments for Medicare have another theory they’d like to test: If government just would get out of the way, private enterprise would solve the nation’s health care crisis.
Will it work any better for everyone’s health care than it has for Medicare? Don’t bet on it.


Private companies and public responsibilities don’t work well together for the simple reason that they are at opposition to each other in terms of their functions. Private business has one function, to make money for their owners. Private companies take their profit margins (anywhere from 10 to 25 percent) and then the rest is for whatever job they are doing.
Since 9-11, the Bush administration has been hiring private companies to do much of the work in the intelligence sector. The average government worker in this sectorwith benefits cost the government (you and me) about $120,000 while Bush is paying the private sector person about $210,000. These are Bush government figures so of course they can’t be a lie. And where do you think many of these people came from? They came from the government itself with their individual salaries remaining almost the same and the big difference going to the owners and executives of these companies. So much for Bush efficiencies.
If competitive bidding is such an effective way for getting a good price on drugs, why did the Bush administration and the Republican Congress prevent the government from using competitive bidding to get better prices on drug products?
The only thing that works under Bush and the Republicans is the profit margin for the private companies that they favor. Can anyone say $6,000,000,000,000, my favorite number which is the amount, plus or minus, the national debt has gone up under our fearless leader?