Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.03.2008 9:00 pm

Thursday editorial: Paranoia Acres

  • Email this
  • Print this

So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.

freddy_krueger_head_opt2.jpgThus did Franklin Roosevelt begin his first Inaugural Address. Seventy-five years later, fear itself has become an amenity, like granite counter tops and Jacuzzi tubs, that some homebuilders are using to market new houses.

The Post-Dispatch’s Nancy Cambria reported Wednesday that the Villages of Hampton Grove, a neighborhood under development in Wentzville, will be Missouri’s first “full camera-secure subdivision.” Buyers of the $200,000 to $400,000 houses will find them wired with a three-camera surveillance system. Homeowners plug their computers into the system and voila!

Look out kidnappers! Look out prowlers! Look out Freddy Krueger! For that matter, because the system can be accessed online, look out teenagers who think they can have a party when mom and dad are out of town!

Security experts interviewed by Ms. Cambria were dubious about the value of the systems, but one would-be homebuyer was impressed: “The camera thing is huge to us. I watch these shows where these predators get the kids.”

Ah, yes. Television. “Cops.” “America’s Most Wanted.” “The Six O’Clock News.” Old movies like “Hostage” or “Panic Room.” Watch enough television, you won’t ever leave the house. Or if you do, you’ll be packing heat. Missouri’s five-year-old concealed carry law owes a lot to fear itself. You watch enough television, it’s obvious that car-jackers and thugs are just around the corner, particularly — God forbid — if you have to go into the city.

People tend not to understand fear itself. In a recent issue of Psychology Today, Paul Slovic, a professor at the University of Oregon who studies the way people make decisions, notes that fear is hard-wired into the brain, always on the lookout for danger. “This is the way our ancestors evaluated risk before we had statistics,” he said.

Thus we fear snakes and falls from high places, but not things that haven’t had time to be wired into the brain, bicycling without helmets, for example. Fear is an emotional response, not a reasoned one. No matter how long the odds against experiencing similar trauma, the more people are exposed to scary things (the Shawn Hornbeck kidnapping, for instance, or TV images of plane crashes), the more they come to fear them.

Our view: If it makes you feel safer, by all means buy a house in Paranoia Acres or the Villas at Trepidation Creek. It’s an extra $2,500, money that you’ll be more likely to recoup by putting in a nicer kitchen or bathroom, but if it makes you feel safe, go for it. You could also wire your home with a $10,000 security system, get a concealed-carry permit and a Doberman.

Odds are overwhelmingly against your ever needing the help they provide, but if you’re fearful, go ahead and spend the dough.

But understand you’re thinking with your fears and not your head. Only about 1 in every 2,200 cases of child abduction or disappearance can be attributed to persons unknown to the child or family. The FBI’s Uniform Crime Statistics indicated that some 80 percent of homicides are committed by persons known by the victims. Most of the rest of them involve young males, alcohol and drugs.

But on your way out to Wentzville to look at houses, be sure to buckle your seat belt.

4 comments

Comments are closed.

Personally, I think this is silly - especially in Wentzville. And it is true, parental concern about kidnapping is WAY overblown. But that doesn’t justify the other comments here. In fact, concealed carry, and defensive use of firearms in general, is a good thing. And nobody would benefit more from such things than those living in the crime riddled areas of the city, certain inner-ring suburbs, and unincorporated areas of north county, where the thugs are armed, the cops are drowning, and the good people live in constant fear.

— Nick Kasoff
11:45 am September 4th, 2008

“Our view: If it makes you feel safer, by all means buy a house in Paranoia Acres or the Villas at Trepidation Creek.”

You might have added: By all means give up smoking, go on a diet, buy an exercise machine, support nationalized health care and promote more gun control. Are those also “thinking with your fears and not your head?”

Based on editorial history the editorial board must define the rationality of “fear” based on your own biased perceptions? Do you not even recognize how patently arrogant and condescending the above editorial is? Is this editorial an individual’s offering of wisdom for your readers or does the entire board sign off on this attempt at subtle ridicule of suburbia?

— A#
12:06 pm September 4th, 2008

Fear based on a rastional assessment of the situation is normal and healthy. To often, however, fear is based on misinformation (listen to Rush or Bush talk about Bin Laden comming to get all of us) or out right lies (Bush/Cheney and nuclear weapons in Iraq).
If you have the type of money to buy a security system for your house, by all means make yourself feel safer, but the fact that someone feels insecure enough to have an emotional need to barricade themselves behind cameras and walls usually means that society has a much bigger problem. I thought George and his gang were suppose to be making us safer, or at least feel safer. What has his $6,000,000,000,000 (Trillion) debt bought us besides more money for the rich and large corporations.
I use to be a McCain supporter, but it’s difficult to support someone who wants to stay in someone else’s country for 100 years just so we can feel safer.

— DC
8:12 pm September 4th, 2008

DC… The “bigger problem” you refer to may be the members of our society, like the editorial board and apparently yourself, who feel empowered to decide what is rational for the rest of us and use the powers of government to impose your will. When the “boogie man” G.W. Bush is no longer in the picture, leftists will be searching for another excuse for their failed philosophy.

Many of your fellow Americans agree that Bush is a poor leader and inept President. But, we also recognize that as government worshipers keep enlarging their federal church; they gave him the powers. The awesome power of government is no longer distributed through town halls, county seats, and state houses. The left wanted an omnipotent, collectivist, federal government in Washington, D.C. Now you have it, but try to blame those who warned against it.

Left wing government worshipers remind me of the snake handling congregations in Appalachia. They add more and more vipers to their bureaucratic altar in D.C. and then act surprised when they strike.

— A#
7:35 am September 5th, 2008