Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.24.2008 10:41 pm

Thursday editorial: Patriot games

  • Email this
  • Print this

bush_opt.jpgThe presidential campaign and the Wall Street financial crisis collided Wednesday. What resulted played at times like a cheesy political movie.

The unprecedented cascade of bizarre events almost upstaged a nationally televised effort by President George W. Bush to convince a skeptical nation that nothing less than “preserving America’s overall economy” rides on the passage of the administration’s $700 billion Wall Street bailout plan.

Mr. Bush’s speech clearly was aimed at the two-thirds of Americans whom polls show either doubt the wisdom of the administration’s plan or are opposed to it, based on details that remain in flux.

The president gave a forceful, if necessarily abbreviated, explanation of the crisis. Had he delivered this speech last Friday when he introduced the plan, he might have muted some of the criticism of it. Still, there was no mistaking the gravity of his words.

“We are in the midst of a serious financial crisis,” Mr. Bush said, noting that banks have restricted lending, credit markets have frozen and businesses and families can’t afford to borrow.

“The market is not functioning properly. There is a widespread loss of confidence,” he said. “America could slip into a widespread financial panic.”

Mr. Bush acknowledged that his initial plan, little more than a three-page outline when Congress first saw it last week, has been improved with provisions for a bipartisan oversight panel, taxpayer ownership participation and limits on payouts to executives of failed financial institutions. His speech should go a long way toward building bipartisan support for the plan — and public support as well.

So will his decision, announced shortly before the speech aired, to invite both presidential candidates, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, to a meeting today with congressional leaders to discuss details of the rescue plan.

By including Mr. Obama, the president played along with part of Mr. McCain’s effort to position himself as an economic savior willing to lay politics aside at time of crisis.

Mr. Obama had begun the day’s extraordinary events by calling Mr. McCain to suggest they issue a joint statement on the bailout plan. By the time Mr. McCain returned the call, he had decided to up the ante by suspending his campaign activities and returning to Washington, if not on a white horse, at least as a crusading bipartisan consensus builder.

The Arizona senator even went so far as to suggest postponing the first presidential debate scheduled for Friday evening.

Bemused, Mr. Obama said he thought the debate should go on as scheduled, although he pledged to return to Washington if necessary. By the time the joint statement was issued, Mr. Obama had recaptured the advantage by amending it with a five-point plan that Mr. McCain refused to sign.

Democrats in Congress accused Mr. McCain of grandstanding in the face of polls in which voters give Mr. Obama higher marks on handling the economy. “It’s the longest Hail Mary pass in the history of either football or Marys,” said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

Of course, the debate should take place as scheduled, unless by some odd confluence of events it would conflict with a final Senate vote on the bailout plan. Since Democrats control the Senate schedule, that’s not likely.

Mr. McCain’s gambit was the oldest of ploys, an attempt to gain political advantage by pretending to forswear politics. That Mr. Obama wouldn’t play along comes as no surprise. That Mr. Bush asserted a strong leadership role and gracefully accepted Democratic suggestions for improving the bailout plan, was the surprise, and it underscores just how serious the financial crisis is.

That George W. Bush could demonstrate to John McCain what real bipartisan leadership looks like is at once a pleasant surprise — and a major disappointment.

(Pictured: President Bush poses for photographers after delivering a prime-time speech from the White House on the ailing financial markets, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008, in Washington. AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)

17 comments

Comments are closed.

Just what is it that McCain needs to do that requires him to physically be in DC? Does he plan to wrestle with dissenters and make them cry “Uncle”? Can’t he just make some phone calls and continue to juggle more than one glass ball?

Or, why doesn’t he send the experienced governor from Alaska to DC so that she can use her economic expertise and negotiation skills to gain approval of the bailout?

Probably doesn’t matter, I’m hearing that an agreement has already been reached and McCain didn’t have to wrestle anybody after all.

— mogoid
12:59 pm September 25th, 2008

Here is the latest statement from The Chosen One:

(AP — Chicago) In response to questions concerning Senator John McCain’s announcement that he was suspending his presidential campaign and returning to Washington D.C. to help form legislation to deal with the financial crisis, Senator Barack Obama proclaimed that he would continue campaigning and would appear for the debate on Friday in Mississippi whether Senator McCain showed up or not. He explained, “Look, I have zero practical experience in economics or the national legislative process. My only accomplishment as a U.S. Senator has been to get nominated for a different job. Besides, and more importantly, I’ve already FedEx’d my teleprompter to Biloxi. What am I going to do, stand mute on the floor of the Senate waiting for someone to feed me lines about hope and change? I don’t think so.”

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
1:06 pm September 25th, 2008

SVPPB (Vegetus was wrong and is still wrong) -
Nice try at prevarication. That was McCain’s quote he is upset he cannot have his teleprompter on the Senate floor so Rick Davis can feed him his lines.

— RHarnack
1:39 pm September 25th, 2008

I heard Caribou Barbie wouldn’t let McCain go to Washington until she got her weekly allowances for glasses, haircare, makeup and clothes, along with three consultants and stylists to get it right for her! I mean a woman of her stature can’t have too many $3,000 jackets and $600 glasses can she?

Shhesh, she’s spent about $200,00.00 on all this stuff! That’s 4X the median family income in the US last year!

— Tim Hogan
5:41 pm September 25th, 2008

Are all the politicans, peabrain American consumers and financial experts STUPID? All this will do is provide more money for the STUPID AMERICAN PEOPLE to send to Korea, Japan, Viet Nam, Communist China, etc etc. Please, someone explain to me how this will help THE US ECONOMY, by the stupid consumers sending their money overseas!!! Why are none of the experts pointing out that the consumers are getting the kind of economy they deserve? Until the consumer starts buying American and leaving the Communist Chinese, Korean etc etc products on the shelves our economy will not turn around. The only activity that CREATES wealth in a nation is manufacturing.

— big John
9:15 pm September 25th, 2008

“A CENTRIST” while I understand that you either have a very limited appreciation of just how the world works or you are assuming that the rest of have such a limited perspective, you can’t really expect anyone with a functioning brain to believe that that link you posted is proof positive that Obama has a direct connection to anyone listed in those articles.
Just because someone collects and gives money to a candidate does not mean that that candidate endorses their position. Using your logic, feeble as it is, Bush and Bush/McCain are Nazis and leading proponents of Alaska leaving the Union.
By the way, Alaska was purchased with tax money from Russia. Of all the states, it has the least right to leave the Union. Palin’s “daddy” might want that to make a little money for himself, but the Federal government and by extension the taxpayers have first right of refusal.
How did you enjoy Palin’s expansive explanation on her “vast” foriegn policy experience, particularly her dealings with Russia. I didn’t realize being a neighbor qualified you as an expert on foriegn affairs. Mabe that’s where Bush is having his problems with the Russians, he’s listening to her.

— DC
9:48 pm September 25th, 2008
— STL
11:22 am September 26th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All