Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.30.2008 9:05 pm

Wednesday editorial: Senator Smug

  • Email this
  • Print this
U.S. Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond

U.S. Sen. Christopher"Kit" Bond

Thanks to its senior U.S. senator, Republican Christopher S. “Kit” Bond, Missouri earned last-minute inclusion in the national scandal over the Bush administration’s politically motivated firings of U.S. attorneys.

“The Purge,” as it was known when the story broke in 2006, was thought to have involved eight of the 93 chief federal prosecutors nationwide. But on Monday, when the Justice Department’s Inspector General and the department’s ethics office released their joint report, the name of former U.S. Attorney Todd Graves of Kansas City had been added to the list.

The report says that Mr. Bond’s staff made repeated calls to the White House in early 2005 seeking to have Mr. Graves ousted. It seems Mr. Bond was feuding with Mr. Graves’ brother, U.S. Rep. Sam Graves, R-Tarkio, MO.

In a statement to the Associated Press on Monday, Mr. Bond said he hadn’t known what his staff was up to and offered an apology “to the people of Missouri.”

Todd Graves was replaced in 2006 on an interim basis by Bradley Schlozman, a Justice Department lawyer who had played a key role in filling the department with what he described as “good Americans,” or, as another Justice aide put it, “loyal Bushies.” Mr. Schlozman was replaced by John Wood, Mr. Bond’s cousin.

The Justice Department report is a sorry story of partisan hacks at the White House and at the Justice Department during Alberto Gonzales’ tenure as attorney general. It describes their clumsy efforts to push out federal prosecutors to promote the political interests of prominent GOP operatives.

It also details widespread efforts to deflect and obstruct the investigation. Those findings led Mr. Gonzales’ successor, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, to appoint Nora Dannehy, a career federal prosecutor, to conduct a criminal investigation.

Perhaps the most egregious of the firings was that of former U.S. Attorney David C. Iglesias of New Mexico, who was dumped in response to complaints by the state’s top GOP officials that he refused to pursue bogus political corruption charges against Democrats.

Todd Graves’ forced resignation didn’t garner the headlines that the Iglesias situation did. But the abuse of power by Mr. Bond’s staff described in the report made a mockery of the principle of federal prosecutorial independence.

The report reveals that in 2005, Mr. Bond’s legal counsel called the White House on several occasions seeking Todd Graves’ removal. The calls had nothing to do with Todd Graves’ performance as a prosecutor. They had everything to do with intramural political squabbling in the Missouri Republican Party.

There was, according to the report, some kind of “discord between the in-state staffs” of Mr. Bond and Sam Graves. “Bond’s staff . . . wanted Todd Graves to try to rein in his brother, but Todd Graves did not do so. . . . To allow members of Congress or their staff to obtain the removal of U.S. attorneys for political reasons,” the report concludes, “severely undermines the independence and non-partisan tradition of the Department of Justice.”

Mr. Bond declined to be interviewed by the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office in the course of its investigation. He told the office that he didn’t recall having any contact with the Bush administration about Todd Graves and knew nothing of value to the investigation.

Mr. Bond’s statement to the Associated Press on Monday said, “I had no knowledge of my staff’s action, did not approve it and would not have approved it. Missouri deserves better, and I expect better of my staff.”

Mr. Bond is right about this: Missouri deserves better, such as a thorough explanation of why his staffers felt it was appropriate to ask the White House to intervene in a home-state political dispute. Perhaps Ms. Dannehy’s criminal investigation will shed some light on that.

7 comments

Comments are closed.

So when will Mr. Bond replace the recreant staffers? I believe Mr. Bond’s staff “felt it was appropriate to ask the White House to intervene in a home-state political dispute” because they had knowledge of it being done in other areas of the country in the same circumstance. And Mr. Bond is right: he is sorry, sorry he got caught playing politics with a supposedly politically untouchable judicial system. How can the Federal Prosecutor be free to excersize his powers if he has to look over his shoulder to make sure his own party’s minions are not trying to subjugate his efforts? Mr. Bond, while knowing how to make political hay inside the Beltway has proven he’s been there way too long.

— willys
12:16 am October 1st, 2008

Just think, if a federal prosecutor can be treated this way just think how we can if one gets a hair up their rear about you and I. Been there, know that game real well. People who operate in such evil ways screwing with people, their heads should roll.

But, what a man Todd Graves was not to even mention it to his brother and actually lost his job over it. It is continuing raining on Bond, just look at him, he must be a miserable man and hopefully this time he will meet his fate over his rotten criminal behavior.

— D. Walker
9:10 am October 1st, 2008

So, who was Koster cushy with, Sam Graves or the Kit Bond group?

That answer would completely make up my mind about the Attorney General’s race.

— D. Walker
9:17 am October 1st, 2008

Lot of questions here.

Bond claims he was unaware of what his staff was up to, including top dog legal counsel Jack Bartling. That’s possible, considering more than one Bond staffer has stated the Senator routinely signs documents he hasn’t drafted nor read. This indicates absolute trust and faith in his staff.

So why did Bartling and other staffers feel comfortable engaging in conduct that Bond now claims he would not have approved of? Was his staff trying to sabotage him?

A staff that’s comfortable engaging in misconduct, real or imagined, indicates two things: 1) It happened more than once; 2) the comfort level came from above.

On another note, next time federal investigators quizz me about conduct in my office, I’ll try the “Bond-blocking” technique of I know nothing and have “nothing of value to the investigation”. Classic.

— morehouse
4:51 pm October 1st, 2008

Another question.

Bartling left Bond’s office in December, 2005. Did he jump a sinking ship, as insiders have stated, or was he pushed off?

— morehouse
4:54 pm October 1st, 2008

Hopefully, Bond’s legal counsel is disbarred and will meet his little rotten faith for his criminal behavior too.

— D. Walker
10:14 pm October 1st, 2008

This is another fine example of the Bush Administration and the lack of checks and balances that have occured for the last 8 years. Kit Bond needs to go!!! This man has been in office way tooo long. He has the same mentality of the right wing, that they are above the law and answer to no one. I do not see any right wingers commenting on this one. Where are you ? How can you justify this one?? Can you blame the liberal media on this? Kit is blaming his staff and claims he knew nothing about it. Try again, this is on you on Kit Bond, you are in charge, and responsible for what those under you do.

Does anyone remember the 2000 election day when Kit Bond was livid that the polls might of stayed open to allow the voters that were waiting in line at closing time to cast their vote. It was in the City of St. Louis. Good ole Kit was ranting and spitting in the microphone spouting his verbiage.
The folks waiting in line could of been voting for Al Gore (likely) and he wanted it stopped now! That image of him has not left me.

This should be a major factor in whether Kit is re-elected. The great people of Missouri will re-elect him anyway. I have no faith in our voters. Too many caught up on the two-issues they cannot get over Abortion and Stem Cell Research.

Get a real job Kit!

— debrasgd3
12:34 pm October 2nd, 2008