Democratic governor faces challenges with Republican Legislature
As a candidate for Missouri governor, Attorney General Jay Nixon told anyone who’d listen about his plans to restore Medicaid coverage to the more than 100,000 poor, elderly and disabled people who lost it in 2005.
On Tuesday, voters responded, sweeping Mr. Nixon into office by landslide margins. He received nearly 60 percent of the vote in his race against Republican U.S. Rep. Kenny Hulshof of Columbia.
But the blue tide that lifted Mr. Nixon barely budged other Democrats. Although his party scored some key wins in St. Louis-area legislative races, Republicans managed to hold their advantage in the House and even added seats to solidify GOP control in the state Senate.
Missouri, long called a bellwether for national elections, this year proved to be something of a lost sheep. While the rest of the country turned sharply toward the center, the legislative character of the Show-Me State kept drifting to the right.
On Wednesday, Governor-elect Nixon spoke confidently about the “strong and direct” message voters sent. “Clearly, yesterday, the people of Missouri called for a new direction,” Mr. Nixon said in a conference call with reporters. “I’ve laid out my vision in the past, and I’m going to do everything possible to make it happen.”
But Republican legislators, who meet today to elect their leaders, don’t see the same call for a new direction and have been equally clear about their resistance to restoring Medicaid coverage to those who lost it in 2005.
Mr. Nixon seemed to acknowledge that reality on Wednesday, saying he will “work within the constraints we have to get health care restored.”
And those constraints involve more than just the unwillingness of Republican leaders to undo their cuts. The nonpartisan Missouri Budget Project warned last May that the state could face a budget shortfall of at least $500 million next year.
Since then, the national and state economies have faltered badly. The group reported last month that state revenue has fallen by about 1 percent over the past three months.
As if to underscore the precarious state of the economy, Piramal Glass Co. in Park Hills, a St. Francois County town not too far from where Mr. Nixon grew up in De Soto, announced Wednesday that it’s laying off 190 employees. As workers lose jobs or have their hours cut, more and more qualify for state assistance programs such as Medicaid. That increases the state’s costs even without expanding eligibility.
The Missouri Department of Social Services reported a 33 percent increase in the number of people applying for Medicaid during September compared to the same month in 2007. It showed a 17 percent hike in the number of applications approved. At least some of the remaining applications are awaiting paperwork to prove eligibility.
Mr. Nixon has said restoring coverage to those cut in 2005 would cost $265 million in state funds, but the state money would generate an additional $431 million in federal matching funds. The combination would provide a vital financial stimulus to the state. And it would help prevent thousands more state residents from losing their homes and health.
Still, finding that $265 million — while also figuring out how to come up with some $500 million that might be needed to meet mandatory expenses — will prove a real challenge.
As attorney general, Mr. Nixon and Republican Gov. Matt Blunt and GOP legislative leaders existed in a perpetual state of war. But on Wednesday, he said that as governor, he expects “less strident partisanship” in his relationship with the Legislature. He said he’s counting on “the message sent by voters” to help forge compromise.
Before that can happen, though, Mr. Nixon and Republican legislative leaders will have to agree on something even more fundamental: the precise nature of the message voters sent.


Nixon’s idea of “less strident partisanship” certainly means that he expects to push Republican legislators into supporting his agenda. Good luck with that!
Sadly, the total failure of the Missouri Republican Party to put out a coherent and persuasive message has cost them dearly. With Democrats controlling all but one statewide office, it behooves Republican leadership to get their act together. The party has continued to fail in St. Louis county. Combining that with the city and Kansas City guarantees continued losses for Republicans in Missouri. Wake up, gentlemen!
The tragedy is the mind set and lack of rational thinking by rural Missourians. Nixon won by a land slide!
Rural Missourians want and NEED these benefits restored but they placed into office Republicans again. How do they figure that this will work?
Rural Missourians have again cut off their own noses to spite their faces.
Pretty smart voting there. (lol).
hey, D! Do ya’ think being kinda’ snotty is going to serve the folks outstate in supporting Democrats.
The Democratic Party needs to vet and support its best people for the House and Senate races, like those folks with the R’s behind their names do. Too often, we have some clown like Bill Haas who perenially drops into some race because his or her ego requires it and the Democratic ticket falters. I only saw some five or so House races sorta close enough this time for a realistic challenge in two years. Similarly, Democrats have to prepare now for two years from now when much of its leadership will be term limited out if they want any chance of defeating the Republicans.
If Mr. Nixon wants to do the job right, he needs to line up legislative support for his bills, have them voted on by the General Assembly, and use the votes in the next election.
Jay got more votes in Missouri than John McCain or any other candidate. i believe thats been the trend for many cycles now. If the Republicans want to go on the record opposing Nixon, fine. Then the Democrats have something to run on in two years because they’ve missed the boat for the eight years of George Bush, and the last four of Matt Blunt.
If Nixon meant what he said, and fully intends on working with us in the middle - and I have no doubt that he is capable, then the P-D is just hyping up a story that isn’t there. I think Jay will do fine in ensuring that he leads as an executive, and respects the voice of the legislature, where MO has wisely invested a check to ensure that there is a balance in our government. The country may fall apart, but as long as Jay does what he said, and our reps do as they said, MO will come out ahead, as we normally do compared to most other places, including ones with much more resources to work with. I think we can be proud this year in-state.
Walker… perhaps the rural Missourians are just behind the curve of your “progressive” thinking. They may not be in such a hurry to “progress” to the “rational thinking” of the 20th century Soviet Union or present day city of St. Louis.