Attendance mandatory at St. Louis schools planning sessions
St. Louis Public Schools will receive a report early next year that could influence crucial aspects of the district’s operations for the next decade and beyond. It also is guaranteed to generate controversy.
At issue is a “comprehensive facilities review” being conducted by MGT of America, Inc. of Olympia, Wash., at the behest of the district’s Special Administrative Board. MGT’s contract requires it to review the district’s buildings and facilities. Many school buildings are operating at just a fraction of their capacity, adding huge maintenance and operating costs at a time when the district is trying to manage difficult financial challenges.
SAB members have suggested that they may need to close as many 20 of district’s 88 school buildings. That’s the stark reality of a decline in enrollment from 42,000 in 2001 to about 25,000 this year.
But there are other factors: Many schools serve as important social anchors for their neighborhoods, and many of the buildings are significant architectural landmarks. Closing any school, in other words, is no small thing, and closing as many as 20 is a daunting task.
MGT, working with local architects, has been assessing each building’s state of repair, along with its safety, comfort and the suitability of its space for specific educational activities, including classroom use of technology. The review includes estimates of district enrollment for the next 10 years and has a tentative deadline of Jan. 31.
The MGT contract’s $625,000 price tag has raised some eyebrows. But given the controversy that has dogged the district and the intensity of emotions that will accompany the closing of any schools, an outside independent analysis makes sense. The quality of the final product will determine whether it was worth the price.
An important part of the process involves a series of public meetings through which parents, educators and community groups can participate. The meetings are scheduled for this week and next at 6 p.m. at various public schools across the city. Each session starts with participants establishing priorities for school facilities, and then breaking into smaller discussion groups to add greater detail to the broad priorities.
Everyone who has a stake in the St. Louis Public Schools’ success or failure has good reason to become involved.
The constellation of schools shapes a community’s landscape and influences its character. And just as the “broken window” has become a metaphor for community disorder and instability, a well-ordered school-house is a potent symbol of commitment to children’s future. The right kind of learning environment can nurture children and inspire teachers.
So far, public participation has been meager. Only 38 people showed up Wednesday at the kick-off session; about 50 attended the second one. The time to become involved is now.
The meeting
schedule:
Tonight
Northwest Academy of Law
5140 Riverview Boulevard
Tuesday
Soldan High School
918 North Union Boulevard
Wednesday
Roosevelt High School
3230 Hartford Street
Thursday
Beaumont High School
3836 Natural Bridge Avenue
Monday, Dec. 15
Central High School
3125 South Kingshighway
Tuesday, Dec. 16
Busch AAA Middle School
5910 Clifton Avenue
Wednesday, Dec. 17
Lyon-Blow Middle School
516 Loughborough Avenue
(All meetings begin at 6 p.m.)


If Obama gets his public works program off the ground, I would suggest that men and women could be put to work fixing our schools as well. We owe it to the children.
The way to have larger crowds at these hearings is to announce that any parent(s) not showing up will NOT HAVE THEIR CHILD registered in the public schools. If they (parents) do not care to participate their child should not participate.
You do know public schools are obligated to accept all who come, right? I cannot blame parents who feel voiceless and who feel perhaps their time is better spent home at the dinner/homework hour (6pm) then going to a meeting where they may feel their voice is not being heard anyway. The SAB says they will listen, but whether or not that is true, the history of business-minded consultants in the district makes the belief that parent voices matter a hard one for parents to hold at this point. That being said, parent voices have made some differences recently in the fight against lead in the schools and the failure to adequately prepare McKinley as a high school, so it is possible, parents, to have some impact, if you choose to continue to fight to be heard.
The public input sessions are being handled poorly. Having all of them consecutively over nine weeknights at the same time right before Christmas is rushed, and provides no options for parents who could only attend on a weekend day.
I attended last night’s session at Soldan High School and found 90 minutes inadequate for real discussion and the format short on real facilities issues. The break-out sessions are moderated by PR consultants who cannot answer basic questions about the scope of the facilities plan, and the phrases like “safety” and “environmental issues” given little definition. The real issues are upgrades, closures and consolidations and costs. We did not get evry close to those last night. Will the oublic get another chance to review the plan with actual facilities consultants _before_ the SAB adopts the plan?