Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.10.2008 9:01 pm

Patrick Fitzgerald polishes the scales at Justice

  • Email this
  • Print this

In March 2005, a month after Alberto Gonzales became U.S. attorney general, Justice Department staffers sent to the White House a chart ranking all 93 U.S. attorneys in terms of their allegiance to President George W. Bush and his administration.

On that chart, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney for Northern Illinois, was ranked somewhere in the middle, below those federal prosecutors who exhibited loyalty to the administration but above the “weak U.S. attorneys who . . . chafed against administration initiatives.”

Two U.S. attorneys who got the same ranking as Mr. Fitzgerald later were fired in a White House political purge of nine federal prosecutors. Mr. Fitzgerald, who was serving a dual role at the time as special counsel into the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity, was insulated from the firings.

That proved to be a bad break for I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney who was sentenced to 2½ years in prison for his role in outing Ms. Plame, and for then-New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who spent 85 days in jail for refusing to cooperate with Mr. Fitzgerald’s single-minded pursuit of the truth.

On Tuesday, it also became a bad break for Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, whom Mr. Fitzgerald charged with conspiracy and corruption for acts that reek of sleaze and stupidity.

That Mr. Fitzgerald survived the Bush administration’s attempts to politicize the Justice Department turned out to be a break for the people of Illinois, who now have yet another golden opportunity to clean up the state’s culture of corruption.

It is also a break for the Justice Department’s 113,000 employees: Mr. Fitzgerald and his assistants and investigators put a little polish back on Lady Justice and her scales, which had been badly tarnished by people that one of Mr. Gonzales’ flunkies called “loyal Bushies.”

Newspaper reporters and prosecutors don’t always see eye-to-eye, perhaps because both professions can attract obsessive people with chips on their shoulders. As Mr. Fitzgerald said to reporters Tuesday, “I will say this: As you guys know, you guys are in the information business of getting it and publishing it, and we’re in the information business of getting it and using it.”

Some journalists thought Mr. Fitzgerald went too far when he jailed Ms. Miller and threatened to jail other reporters who refused to cooperate in the Plame investigation. Mr. Fitzgerald didn’t care. In the end, a judge makes those decisions.

Nor does Mr. Fitzgerald seem to care very much about politics. In New York, where he prosecuted mobsters and terrorists before Mr. Bush appointed to him to the job in Chicago in 2001, he was registered as in “Independent” until he found out that in New York, “Independent” is the name of a political party. Now no one knows his politics.

He put a Republican governor, George Ryan, in prison and now aims to do the same with a Democratic governor. He’s received publicity and attention that any politician would kill for. He has been mentioned as a possible successor to Robert S. Mueller when the head of the FBI retires and even as a possible attorney general. Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, a Democrat, wants him to remain as U.S. attorney in Chicago, and senators from the president’s party generally get their way.

If Mr. Fitzgerald truly wants to clean up Illinois, he’d run for governor in 2010. We don’t care if he’s a Republican or a Democrat, a Whig or a Vegetarian. We’d just like to watch the panic in Springfield.

9 comments

Comments are closed.

Thanks for a good laugh. I will be putting this editorial into a special file for future reference. Although I agree that Mr. Fitzgerald would be an excellent pick for gov of Ill. regardless of party, I am certain that if even he runs as a Republican, which I sincerely doubt he is with his NY Irish Catholic roots, you will still not endorse him. I am sure there is always some sleazy tainted, yet unvetted, Illinois Democrat politician you would rather endorse instead. I am willing to bet he would run as an Independent which would be awesome.

— A CENTRIST
8:59 am December 11th, 2008

“Mr. Fitzgerald’s single-minded pursuit of the truth.”

That statement is patently false in regards to the “Plame affair”. Fitzgerald KNEW from DAY ONE WHO “outed” Plame, Richard Armitage, and that doing so WAS NOT A CRIME. The rest of the investigation was nothing more than a conviction hunt.

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
9:06 am December 11th, 2008

BTW, could you editorial writers please clarify something for me? Which part of the Obamanation does this story represent - the “hope” part or the “change” part? It sounds like the Clinton part to me - both Obama’s being lawyers and all - the coincidences are just to much for me.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/12/report-michelle-obama-is-specifically.html
Here we go again!

— A CENTRIST
9:07 am December 11th, 2008

Just once, just for laughs, could you include the words “Richard Armitage” in a piece that references the Valerie PlameScooter Libby non-story?

— Safer than St. Louis
9:09 am December 11th, 2008

Isn’t it strange, when speaking about a Republican criminal, the P-D always informs the reader of the miscreant’s political affiliation, “He put a Republican governor…”, but where is the political party for the Gov. Blogo????

— martinsh
9:58 am December 11th, 2008

Safer - do you really expect researched and non-misleading editorials from the PD? I’m shocked, I say, shocked!

Has anyone else noticed all the lies everyone is now getting caught in - don’t they say it’s the lies not the deeds that count? Does anyone else remember Jenifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky or Nixon for that matter - just asking?

— A CENTRIST
10:00 am December 11th, 2008

Fitzgerald is not trying to clean up Illinois nor the country. Something is very fishy about the timing of this thing. He’s been “investigating” Blago and corrupt Chicago politicians for months. Why did he wait until after the election to bring something out? That might have influenced millions of voters to vote for McCain instead. Also, why has he closed down the investigation now? Fitzgerald went on and on and on with the Plame?Libby thing. Why did he close this one down before Blago actually committed the crime? Why did he close it down before someone else may have been implicated? I have a feeling that a good defense attorney will get Blago off because he hasn’t actually committed a crime. Something tells me Fitzgerald was getting close to implicating obama and he didn’t want that to happen.

— Frank
3:00 pm December 11th, 2008

Maybe he’s cleaning up Illinois. Or maybe he jumped the gun and exploded his case before money changed hands. At least his heart’s in the right place.

But blagoyakvetch was a prosecutor too. Good prosecutors do not necessarily good governors make. And Illinois hasn’t had an honest Democratic governor in two generations. Perhaps if Fitzgerald keeps Jim Thompson as his model—

— Irv Eff
11:34 am December 14th, 2008

I have great respect for Patrick Fitzgerald, he is a straight foward no nonsense prosecutor. I do disagree with him on the Judith Miller case, some say she was not such a great reporter, but that is beside the point. Since she was employed by a newspaper as a reporter, she should have been protected by the First Amendment and not gone to jail.

— Kenrick
12:03 pm December 16th, 2008