Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.02.2009 9:01 pm

Blago’s last hurrah

  • Email this
  • Print this
No, that's not a check Roland Burris is taking from his pocket as Gov. Blagojevich introduces him on Tuesday. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

No, that's not a check Roland Burris is taking from his pocket as Gov. Blagojevich introduces him Tuesday. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

In a way, we don’t blame Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich for defying the leadership of his own Democratic Party last week and appointing Roland Burris to fill the U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama.

It probably was the governor’s last shot at glory, his last chance to play the big shot. From now on, Mr. Blagojevich will be playing defense in impeachment proceedings and almost certainly as a criminal defendant. Indeed, the coming week promises to be a very bad one for him: By Thursday, a federal grand jury in Chicago may hand up indictments on charges based on the alleged conduct for which the governor was arrested on Dec. 9.

Under federal rules of criminal procedure, U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald had 20 working days from the date of arrest to seek indictments. On Wednesday, he asked a federal court for a  90-day extension for bringing indictments, saying new witnesses had come forward.

Without indictments, a judge would order a preliminary hearing to determine whether there was sufficient cause to bring the case to trial. Such a hearing would give Mr. Blagojevich and his lawyers insight into the evidence the prosecution holds; Mr. Fitzgerald is not known for tipping his hand.

Meanwhile, Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn said last week that he expects the Illinois House to vote on articles of impeachment against the governor by Feb. 12. For fans of irony, that is the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth.

So Tuesday probably was Mr. Blagojevich’s last hurrah, his last play as a supposed rebel. Sadly, Roland Burris — perhaps desperate for his own last hurrah — went along with it.

Downstate Illinois knows Mr. Burris well. A native of Centralia and a graduate of Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, he was elected Illinois comptroller in 1978, becoming the first African-American elected to statewide office. In 12 years as comptroller and four more as attorney general, he was a dull but generally competent public servant. Still, in Illinois, serving 16 years in statewide office without a corruption scandal is an accomplishment for any officeholder.

Democratic voters thrice turned down his primary bids to move up to the governor’s office or the U.S. Senate. In a three-way gubernatorial primary in 2002, Mr. Burris siphoned off enough votes from former Chicago schools chief Paul Vallas to give the nomination to Mr Blagojevich.

Now, at 71, Mr. Burris gets the equivalent of an intentional walk: an appointment, however radioactive, to the U.S. Senate. Never mind that Mr. Fitzgerald has Mr. Blagojevich on tape musing about how much he could get for the appointment. Never mind that nearly every other leading Democrat in the state has said he or she would turn down the job. Never mind that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada says the Democratic caucus won’t seat anyone Mr. Blagojevich sends its way.

How sad that Mr. Burris would be so desperate. How pathetic that Mr. Blagojevich thought the well needed further poisoning. U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush, a Chicago Democrat, who has been recovering from cancer, got off his sickbed to play the race card at Tuesday’s announcement. He warned Senate Democrats not to “hang and lynch the appointee as you try to castigate the appointer.”

Neither race nor gender is an entitlement for any public office, elective or appointive; Mr. Obama’s election should have settled that issue. Still, for all of Mr. Reid’s posturing, the Senate may have no choice but to seat Mr. Burris. The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 four decades ago in a case involving New York Democratic Rep. Adam Clayton Powell that if a member of Congress meets minimal constitutional standards, he must be seated.

Desperation does not disqualify. A legal challenge would drag on for months; the Senate, the nation and, for that matter, the state of Illinois have larger priorities. Mr. Burris will make an effective placeholder and even could run for election to a full term in 2010. True, campaigning as the “Senator from Blagojevich” could be a bit of a problem, but in Illinois, not, alas, an insurmountable one.

5 comments

Comments are closed.

Nice to hear moralizing from the folks who endorsed Blagojevich in his bid for reelection, knowing full well that he was dirty.

“We do so with some reservation, as some in his inner circle come under scrutiny from state and federal investigators.”

“If he does win re-election, we expect to see the clean sweep of cronies and fixers that he promised in his first term.”

Would you have endorsed Richard Nixon after Watergate, hoping HE would clean house? Truth is, Nixon was a far better chief executive, and far more popular one, than Mr. Blagojevich.

— Nick Kasoff
1:51 pm January 3rd, 2009

This is yet another “vast right wing conspiracy”. It’s Bush’s fault. Cheney did it so his friends could make money.

— SoCoBoy
6:55 pm January 3rd, 2009

“Neither race nor gender is an entitlement for any public office, elective or appointive”

If you people aren’t the world’s biggest hypocrites! You made it very clear in your endorsements of Obama that we should vote for him because he is black if for no other reason because you couldn’t think of any qualifications he had. Then you have the nerve to actually make that statement? You are kidding, right? In history, can anyone name any other state senator who went straight to the U. S. Senate?

— A CENTRIST
7:46 pm January 3rd, 2009

“without a corruption scandal is an accomplishment for any officeholder.”

I re-read this whole editorial this AM and found another interesting statement above. Kevin Horrigan, is it really too much to ask for the PD to do any research whatsoever? The incompetence is astonishing and I am really getting tired of not getting paid to do your work. Mr. Burris does have his issues. Two cases which involve Rolando Cruz and Carole Mosley Braun come to mind:

http://www.realchange.org/moseley.htm

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/16981.html

Personally, I feel that Mr. Burris should be seated in the senate. Gov. Blago has not been charged with a crime and is still the sitting governor.
He will be seated and so will Caroline Kennedy who also “mirrors” Hillary’s qualifications. This is Democrat politics at its finest. The more things change, the more things stay the same.

— A CENTRIST
11:53 am January 4th, 2009

I’m sorry editorial board, but Blagojevich did not merely defy the Democratic Party. He created a Constitutional quagmire. Both houses of our Congress have much greater issues to concern themselves with. They do not need to take time to devise a Constitutional way to reject the appointment - which it doesn’t seem there is.

Now, when the Senate attempts to exclude Burris from taking his oath, even though he is qualified, he will file suit. This has the potential to move its way to the US Supreme Court. Throughout this time, Illinois will have only one representative in the Senate.

So, dear editorial board, you can’t blame Blagojevich?! Pathetic. You guys love cranking out drivel which you attempt to pass as an “editorial.”

Further this sentence makes absolutely no sense:
“Neither race nor gender is an entitlement for any public office, elective or appointive; Mr. Obama’s election should have settled that issue.”

Maybe you mean public office is not an entitlement based upon race or gender…?

How does this joker even have a job in news media?

— DCL
3:23 pm January 5th, 2009