Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.16.2009 9:02 pm

Deep recession is the time to dig deeper for people in need

  • Email this
  • Print this
Tuesday, December 23, 2008 -- Tonya Nettles, an operator at the 2-1-1 help line call center run by the United Way of Greater St. Louis, takes some notes during a call. The help line, which provides referrals to social service providers, took in more than 80,000 calls in 2008.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008 — Tonya Nettles, an operator at the 2-1-1 help line call center run by the United Way of Greater St. Louis, takes some notes during a call. The help line, which provides referrals to social service providers, took in more than 80,000 calls in 2008.

The United Way of Greater St. Louis’ annual campaign doesn’t begin for another four months or so. The kickoff usually occurs around Labor Day. But preparations already are underway, with volunteers from across the community — men and women who actually make the campaign happen — coming together to make plans.

This year’s strategy sessions will be steeped in uncertainty. Since the 2008 campaign began, savings and investment portfolios of individual and philanthropic givers — large and small — have been devastated by the stock market and financial industry’s woes. Many portfolios have lost as much as half of their value.

Every sector of the economy, with the exception of health care and education, has experienced steep decline. Thousands of local workers have lost their jobs. Tens of thousands more experience daily worry about job security.

Charitable organizations, including those that depend on the United Way, are worried. It’s only natural to assume that corporate and individual givers will have less to give and should not be pushed. With proper planning, that assumption can be challenged. This year should be the year of non-profit and charity giving in St. Louis.

Anyone can share in the blessings of good times. Now is when a community’s mettle and character is put to the test, when its social fabric and the welfare of its people are at greatest risk.

The Washington Post ran what’s called a “trend piece” this week. Under the headline “When you’re flush, but acting flat broke,” the story examined the spending habits of those who are still affluent and financially secure.

Sure enough, discretionary purchases were found to have been scaled way back during uncertain times.

Even those who have money to spend are holding back.

An economist from the University of Chicago suggested that in good times, “consumers saw investments in their homes or stock portfolios shoot up . . .without much effort.” That made it easier to spend.” But when home value falls and stock holdings tank, he said, “people just curl up into a ball.”

That’s understandable
, but it’s not the American way. In times of crisis, people pull together. The challenge is to restore confidence to those whose who have adequate resources and persuade them to do more for those who have it a lot worse.

Gary Dollar, president of the United Way of Greater St. Louis, notes that requests at local food pantries are up 20 percent, with agencies estimating that seven in every 10 new clients have never used a food pantry before.

That’s not all. Mr. Dollar receives anecdotal reports of a growing number of former United Way contributors are seeking basic help.

He says this “is a whole new group . . .of people who in the past have been our donors and who now need help.”

Historically, St. Louis has been one of the nation’s most generous communities during United Way campaigns. This year’s challenge will be to maintain that reputation; reliable givers — corporate and individual — should lead by example and aggressively ask others to step up. Perhaps there could even be a “second collection,” as they have in churches, for basic needs for food, shelter and clothing.

St. Louis is known for our baseball, our beer, our hospitals and our neighborhoods. We can also become America’s “most generous city.”

8 comments

Comments are closed.

Isn’t there a part of the new Federal budget that lowers the deductions [wealthy] taxpayers may take for giving to the United Way?

— egoist
5:05 am April 17th, 2009

President Obama would limit the charitable deduction to taxpayer’s earning over $250,000 to 28 percent, the rate in place during the Reagan administration. (It currently is 35 percent).

The president defends the proposal as affecting about 1 percent of taxpayers and making the deduction more equitable.

“When I give $100, I’d get the same amount of deduction as when some — a bus driver who’s making $50,000 a year, or $40,000 a year — give that same $100,” President Obama told the Washington Post.

“Now, if it’s really a charitable contribution, I’m assuming that (whether the deduction is 28 percent or 35 percent) shouldn’t be a determining factor as to whether you’re giving that $100 to the homeless shelter down the street,” he said.

— Eddie Roth
7:30 am April 17th, 2009

““Now, if it’s really a charitable contribution, I’m assuming that (whether the deduction is 28 percent or 35 percent) shouldn’t be a determining factor as to whether you’re giving that $100 to the homeless shelter down the street,” he said.”

Yea, when you give $20 it’s not. When you give $20,000 there’s a big difference.

Once again, the party who’s platform is to help people, actually hurt them.

— AJ
8:32 am April 17th, 2009

I’m sorry all of you Obama Dems, your messiah (who insists that Jesus be covered up), was elected. You simply cannot have your cake and eat it to.
Which is, let Christians be Christian (your messiah said that we are not a
Christian nation) or let the Marxists be Marxists and take away your money and spend it the way they wish. You don’t get both choices.

You elected Obama to raise taxes on those making over $250,000. Those $250,000 earners with four kids and stuggling to save for college, will be taxed at the same rate as Oprah and Bill Gates. Is that fair I ask? They simply can’t afford to raise their families and someone elses. Those who need help were the Obama voters and you elected him to take care of you thumbing your nose at the Christian right. Good luck with that choice.

— A CENTRIST
11:39 am April 17th, 2009

How much money did the Post-Dispatch give to charities last year, in their effort to be a better corporate partner and sponsor of our regional area?

By the way, it isn’t “our beer” anymore…

— Tim
11:48 am April 17th, 2009

The only difference is the bus driver is paying 28% tax and I am paying 35% (and will be paying 39.5% if Obama keeps his promise). It isn’t fair on its face. Justify it however you want. It will cause a decline in charitable giving. Every Philanthropy group in America says it will. Obama says it won’t. It won’t matter to uncle Joe Biden who have virtually nothing to charity again this year. OVer the past two years, Biden has given less than $3000 on income of a half million. At least Obama gave nearly ten percent this year.

— jjk
7:22 pm April 17th, 2009

If President Obama said “2 + 2= 5″, it appears that Mister Roth’s knee jerk response would be to defend him.

Kinda’ sad, no?

— — D.O. Nutts
1:38 pm April 18th, 2009

If the Reagan rate of charitable gift deductibility isn’t good enough for you, don’t give. That’s your call.

If you want to be grumpy, that’s your call, too.

Plus, I have written before about Joe Biden’s charitable giving:

http://tinyurl.com/crllfd

— Eddie Roth
2:14 pm April 18th, 2009