Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
11.05.2009 9:01 pm

Public confidence and the “blue wall of silence”

  • Email this
  • Print this
R.J. Matson/Post-Dispatch

R.J. Matson/Post-Dispatch

In the past 11 months, nine current or former St. Louis police officers have been charged with federal or state crimes. Four others have been publicly charged by the department with falsifying search warrant information or police reports.

Federal authorities are believed to still be investigating the Police Department’s ties with a downtown towing company that may have short-changed the city $700,000 in fees. A former police detective has pleaded guilty to a federal mail fraud charge in a scheme involving the towing company. That scandal led to the resignation of former Police Chief Joe Mokwa in 2008.

An internal investigation into whether officers were inventing “confidential informants” to get prosecutors to issue arrest warrants led to a lawsuit by the St. Louis Police Officers Association. In September, a judge ruled that officers must disclose the identity of informants to their superiors. But that ruling was made only after prosecutors began throwing out or reviewing hundreds of cases in which warrants were challenged.

There has been controversy over the terms of “secondary employment,” the off-duty jobs that many officers work, and whether officers are held accountable by the department for their conduct when they’re off the department clock.

The next shoe to drop will be the release next week of a state audit of the department’s business operations. Chief Daniel Isom, who has seen the audit’s preliminary results, refused to characterize them, but said he is “comfortable” that the department already is addressing the problems it found.

And, oh yes, the city’s aging police headquarters on Clark Street needs $100 million in repairs.

In all, it’s been a difficult first year for Mr. Isom, who took office in October 2008 — he was even on crutches for a while after tearing up a knee playing basketball. With all of the department’s problems, we asked him last week in a meeting with Post-Dispatch editors and reporters, if he worried that public confidence in the department has suffered.

“To the contrary,” he replied. “I have people, business people and regular citizens, coming up to me all the time and saying, ‘Hey, you guys are doing a great job.’ They’re glad we’ve elevated the standards, trying to hold people accountable.”

Still, he said, “it’s clear there have to be significant changes. A very small portion of our officers believe the ends [getting convictions] justify the means.”

Mr. Isom said, “Not to make excuses, but a system where you make 30 arrests and maybe get eight convictions seems like a revolving door. But it’s not an excuse for skirting the law.”

Within each of the nine police districts, he estimated there are “maybe five” officers who take short cuts — whether it’s misconduct, corruption or lying in an official capacity. “I tell all our recruits that this kind of thing can have a devastating impact, a spiraling effect that will affect 50 people or a thousand or five thousand people,” he said.

Management theorists say that within any organization there exists a culture that seeks to protect the organization against outsiders. No matter how much people within the organization — whether it’s a bank, a sports team, a presidential administration or even a newspaper — gripe among themselves, they tend to band together against outside critics.

Among police organizations, multiple studies have been done of what’s called the “blue code” or the “blue wall of silence.” Cops stay loyal to other cops. Ironically, police officers complain about the “no snitching” culture on the streets — people are shot dead and “nobody knows nothin’.”

So it’s entirely possible that in each of the nine city police districts, many officers — including commanders — may have a pretty good idea who the five guys are who take shortcuts. Still, Mr. Isom said, there’s a “small, strong culture” that believes that getting bad guys off the streets sometimes may make shortcuts OK.

“It’s always been a problem,” Mr. Isom said of the “blue wall.” But he said he has made personal appeals to the department’s officer — everyone from lieutenant colonels to probationary officers — to come forward if they know of wrongdoing, and “and I’ve heard from a lot of them.”

Mr. Isom says he is confident that “99 percent” of the city’s officers do their jobs honestly. The department is aggressively trying to weed out its problems. Crime rates were down 9 percent overall in the city last year, even though the murder total of 167 was up 21 percent.

Total crime was down another 5.2 percent through September of this year; 98 murders were committed, as compared with 136 for the first nine months of 2008. So on the streets, where it counts the most, the department is doing an outstanding job.

The audit to be released next Thursday is expected to show plenty of room for improvement in the administrative operations. The department will have to find money to repair or replace its 81-year-old headquarters building.

But St. Louis can be confident in its police department. It is not without problems, but it is aware of them and willing to confront them. That is all that can be asked.

13 comments

Isom has done more to ruin the officers morale than any chief in memory. He seems to go out of his way to create obstacles for the rank and file officer. One recent example: a city cop was killed in a collision with a DTS Company truck. The officer was responding with light and siren. The truck driver turned right into the cop and crushed him against a building. Isom went out of his way to excuse the actions of the DTS driver, rather than highlighting the obvious inattention/negligence of the driver. Was the chief getting a little something under the table from the insurance comapny or the trucking company? Why did he immediately exonerate the DTS truck driver who clearly was at fault? He really screwed the poor widow and for what political gain? A perfect example of abandoning his officers and their widowed wives and now fatherless children. What sort of political points did he gain from this suspicious action?

— kehrtmarsch
4:15 am November 6th, 2009

It has been mentioned before that the current corruption problems with the city PD can be traced to the decision to restrict hiring. Since the decision was made to only hire city residents or those who would move to the city(!) the talent pool now reflects that population. Rather than hire the best available candidate for this sensitive position, the criteria is residency rather than talent or ethics. You reap what you sow. Sadly, the best and the brightest can go elsewhere for careers in law enforcement, leaving St Louis with either questionable candidates or incompetent background investigators.

— mahatma khoat
5:52 am November 6th, 2009

And I agree that whole DTS vs. cop fatality accident reeks of coverup and kickback.

— mahatma khoat
5:53 am November 6th, 2009

A willingness to confront is all that can be asked?? Who writes this drivel? This, in a nutshell, says so, so much about St. Louis.

— Not Impressed
8:41 am November 6th, 2009

I agree with the previous, Isom sold out that poor widow awfully fast, before the accident investigation was even done! Trying to sweep the whole incident under the rug quickly. I assume Isom got his under the table while the poor cop was still in intensive care. A sterling example of taking care of your own, chiefie. NOT! No wonder morale on the force is so bad.

— kathyqtpi
9:29 am November 6th, 2009

kehrtmarsch,

“Isom has done more to ruin the officers morale than any chief in memory.”

Now you owe it to us all to explain how you have perceived that this man, Isom have done more to ruin officers morale than any other chief in memory.

Please explain how to us with examples/specifics. Are we just suppose to take your word for that without knowing what the heck you are even talking about and why would you even say such if true without at least giving us some reason why you believe such a thing. Certainly you must no better if you are indeed an adult.

— D. Walker
10:58 am November 6th, 2009

walker-you can read, cant you? I laid it out cogently and concisely how the chief in his rush to pander to a truck company, screwed this poor widow and her kids. By not standing behind this widow and her 3 kids, he destroyed the morale of the rank and file. I accept that logical thought is not your forte, but please try to follow along. The accident investigation has not even been concluded and published and he was absolving the truck company while his officer was dying. I understand that since he is black and you view everything in terms of race, you would try to support this man, but even your prejuduced views cant obscure the facts in this sordid affair.

— kehrtmarch
11:20 am November 6th, 2009

Kehrts-why do you bother with Walker? She is the most racist commentor on these forums. If she wasn’t black she would have been banned long ago for the spiteful, hateful, venom that she spews. Ignore this racist like everyone else does. She is so corrupt in her heart nothing she posts is without the taint of racism and hate.

— taxpayer
11:25 am November 6th, 2009

mahatma khoat and the whole ”must live in the city” schtick….Tell me, mahatam, how come three county cop families live on my street alone? If the City is good enough for county cops to live in, why not city cops?? It’s the fact that they HAVE to is all. They don’t want to be told where they can and cannot live, and the whole city school mess but come on now…And a croocked cop is a croocked cop, period. No one makes them do what they don’t want to do.

— REALLY??
11:25 am November 6th, 2009

taxpayer,

Why are you so warped and twisted that you can’t see that I have asked a valid question?

— D. Walker
12:12 pm November 6th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All