Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
10.07.2008 4:07 pm

Joe McCarthy’s America

  • Email this
  • Print this
Andy Martin in a 2006 file photo

Andy Martin in a 2006 file photo

“I don’t pretend to be an exclusively fact-based reporter, though I try as hard as I can to get the facts.”

– Andy Martin

Suppose you were a television executive putting together a “documentary” on Democrat Barack Obama. Would you base a big part of your production on assertions made by Andy Martin?

Fox News Channel did on Sunday.

The program, aired as part of conservative commentator Sean Hannity’s “Hannity’s America,” was entitled “Barack and Friends: The history of radicalism.” It purported to provide “exclusive information, never revealed before, about (Mr. Obama’s) ties to controversial people and radical groups.” Sifting through the transcript, however, we found less new information than slurs and smears that have circulated anonymously on the Internet.

One of the program’s main sources was a perennial political candidate named Andy Martin. In 2006, when he ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate, Mr. Martin was among the first to claim that Mr. Obama is a secret Muslim.

Mr. Martin’s campaigns — he has run for office as both a Republican and a Democrat, in Connecticut, Illinois and Florida — have been marked by bizarre allegations, barrages of e-mail press releases and frequent threats of litigation.

During Sunday evening’s prime time Fox telecast, Mr. Martin offered what he modestly described as his “expert opinion” that Mr. Obama was groomed to run for higher office by Bill Ayers, a founder of the radical Weather Underground group who is now an education professor in Chicago.

Mr. Ayers is a big admirer of Cuban President Fidel Castro and Venezeulan President Hugo Chavez, Mr. Martin claimed. “We are basically in the throes of a social revolution which attempts to essentially freeze out anyone who is not part of this radical ideology,” he said.

Based on Mr. Martin’s record, there’s plenty of reason to be skeptical of a man who was denied a law license, sanctioned by a federal court for filing frivolous lawsuits against people he thought had wronged him, and expressed virulent anti-Semitism.

When Mr. Martin ran for Congress in Connecticut in 1986, the Chicago Tribune has reported, the name of his campaign committee included the phrase “to exterminate Jew power in America.”

In a 1983 personal bankruptcy case, he called a federal judge a “crooked, slimy Jew who has a history of lying and thieving common to members of his race.” In a related filing, the Tribune reported, he expressed sympathy for Nazis who perpetrated the Holocaust.

Although he graduated from the University of Illinois law school, Mr. Martin was denied a law license in 1973 because of “issues raised as to (Martin’s) mental stability.” Among them was his Selective Service record, showing that the man who then went by the name Anthony R. Martin-Trigona had “a moderately-severe character defect manifested by well-documented ideation with a paranoid flavor and a grandiose character.”

Among the evidence cited to deny his admission to the bar was a petition filed by Mr. Martin asking that a parking ticket be thrown out because it was “entered by an insane judge,” and his description of an attorney as “shaking and tottering and drooling like an idiot.”

Mr. Martin has been sanctioned by a federal court for filing “vexatious, frivolous and scandalous” law suits. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said his frequent suits seemed designed to “harass persons who have unluckily crossed his path.”

During his 2006 campaign alone, Mr. Martin threatened to sue the Chicago Tribune for publishing a poll showing he had support from less than 1 percent of Republican voters. And he sued WBBM-Channel 2 in Chicago when it refused to include him in a televised debate.

It’s possible, of course, than even someone as deeply flawed as Andy Martin can be right on an issue. But the odds don’t favor it.

Responsible journalists would likely be as interested in Mr. Martin’s evidence as his spectacular charges. But not Fox News Channel. It’s Sunday’s broadcast was heavy on the innuendo and smear, light on the factual basis for charges made by Mr. Martin and other so-called experts.

That’s the way things used to work back in the day, when the late Sen. Joseph “Tail Gunner Joe” McCarthy used innuendo and smears to intimidate witnesses and cow the national press. Apparently, that’s still the way things work in Sean Hannity’s America.

14 comments

Comments are closed.

Gee, the Post is attacking Fox News Channel and defending Obama. Who would have predicted such a thing?

— Nick Kasoff
5:40 pm October 7th, 2008

Who you gonna’ believe?

Carlton and the P-D Neo-Comms… Fox News… or how about Bill Ayers himself ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDwHns0LetE

“But one way of looking at it is The Weather Underground was a great teaching moment and to the extent we didn’t fully realize what we were trying to do we were bad teachers and to the extent we did good things we were good teachers.” ~Bill Ayers

===

— BobZ.
6:33 pm October 7th, 2008

Well Nick, sometimes it’s just too easy. Kind of like questioning Tina/Palin’s ability to say a complete sentence or tell the truth.
You can question a person’s position or record without telling a lie, but Fox and Palin/McCain just don’t seem to be able to do that. Mabe they don’t have anything legitimate to offer?

— Palin/McCain fan
6:34 pm October 7th, 2008

Hey BobZ. Took a look and didn’t see or hear much, although there was a lot of Spanish. I guess you think most of us speak the language.
But Bob, I just wanted to let you know when I was 5, I went to school with someone who later killed a few people when he was in his thirties. I even played a game or two of kickball with him, so just call me “Killer” Palin/McCain fan if you want. And I give you permission to use it against me when I run for President in my next lifetime.

— Palin/McCain fan
6:48 pm October 7th, 2008

P/McC fan –

Got it. We’ll mark you down as on-board with the P-D Neo-Comms team.

Ayers spoke English, so that was easy.

Rough translation of the Spanish dialogue:
“Dear comrades. Our northern command reports all is going as planned. The subversive Alex Meyer has been banished back to Virginia. Our editorial stooges can proceed with the Bolivarian-Obamavarian Progressive march. Subscriptions are way down but Iowa hasn’t a clue. Viva la Revolución! Also, on Tuesday the 7th we’ll be holding a mixer at The Royale to benefit the St. Louis Democratic & Patronage Club. See you there.”

http://www.asne.org/images/2008-venezuela-Chavez-bailon.jpg

===

— BobZ.
7:50 pm October 7th, 2008

This is beyond hysterical. All of a sudden the PD editorial page decides to do some actual research and wouldn’t you know it happens when someone attacks their guy. Has it ever occurred to you to do the same extensive research on Obama or even Biden? I don’t believe any editorials written by the PD because they are so factually lame. I think Mr. Martin was spot on. Every thing he stated can be backed up on the Internet. Oh but it was on Fox, like the PD has any cred left whatsoever. It think this may be a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Why don’t you actually try proving anything this man said is untrue before you attack him and what he says.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-ayers-partners-in-revolution/2/

Just check out your blog links, Dangerous Intersections, please. Why not a local blog called http://www.gatewaypundit.blogspot which actually has some real current info going on.

— A CENTRIST
10:07 pm October 7th, 2008

The yappers once again fail to be informed by any reality, just their famtasies about what they want the truth to be, and is not.

John McCain and the GOP are running around the coutry trying to strike voters from lists if they’ve lost their homes due to foreclosure.

John McCain and the GOP have tageted areas for their suppression camp[aigns where the voters are predominantly Democratic, and as a result, the voters John McCain and the GOP are tryiung to strike becauiuse they lost their homes are mostly African-American and Hispanic.

John McCain and the GOP’s response to the economic crisis is to use hardship to strike voters from voter lists which voters likely will support Democratic candidates.

The RNC has doen this before, and now, as then, there’s a lawsuit been filed in Michigan to stop John McCain and GOP from profiting from the economic hardships of the middle class.

McCain-Palin hasn’t a clue!

— Tim Hogan
2:07 am October 8th, 2008

BobZ,

Perhaps you should go back and take a look at the links in the post. See the story where Andy Martin claims to have found Saddam in Baghdad (he says he trained two feral dogs to help him sniff out the former Iraqi leader).
Read the law suits he filed seeking $10 billion in damages from the state of Florida.
See the news stories about Andy’s role creating the secret Muslim e-mails, and his anti-Semitic case filings, and his criminal record. If I still had them, I would have been happy to include some of the hundreds of e-mails he sent to me during the 2006 Senate campaign (a few of them still available on Nexis, if you’re interested in getting a flavor of the man’s stability).
I’d be interested to read your reaction, and hear you defend using Andy Martin as a source for a news report.

— John G. Carlton
11:27 am October 8th, 2008

Fox and Hannity using unsubstantiated sources and “nut jobs” like “Martin” — I am shocked! Shocked! Not as shocked as I would be if they actually had facts, dates, names that were all true.

— RHarnack
3:25 pm October 8th, 2008

John G.,
Why should I bother to defend Andy Martin — I don’t know him, read him nor care about him. Perhaps you can find somebody else with whom to bicker over your straw man.

I don’t watch/read Sean Hannity, so I didn’t see the show. Did you watch it … was Martin a big part of the show or one of little significance? Do you know or are you getting second-hand reports?

Are you comfortable with the position that Bill Ayers is NOT a big admirer of Cuban President Fidel Castro and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez? Seems it would be something about which you’d give a little more thought.

Found an interesting coincidence in that your Hannity-Martin-Ayers comments mimicked Robert Gibbs’ post-debate talking points on FNC. (found this morning on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgn6rjGbp0c )

You and Gibbs are working from the same template. What are the odds?

Gibbs gets the talking points from John G.’s keyboard — or you’re an unofficial tub-thumper working for the Defend Obama From Ayers campaign? Hmmm…
.
.
Today’s Ayers from a respected scholar:
www . city-journal . org/html/16_3_ed_school.html

“Ayers makes clear that his political views haven’t changed much since those glory days.”

===

— BobZ.
8:44 pm October 8th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All