A historic day for Latinos, women and the working class
President Barack Obama’s nomination of federal appellate court judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court is a historic event that immediately reverberated among Latinos, women and ordinary Americans who seek to achieve lofty dreams despite humble beginnings.
If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Sotomayor would become the first Hispanic and the third woman to serve on the nation’s highest court.
Her story is exceptional and inspiring to Latinos, women and working-class families. Her parents moved to New York from Puerto Rico. She was raised in housing projects in the South Bronx. Her father worked in a factory before he died when she was 9. Her mother worked two jobs while rearing her and her brother, now a physician.
Sotomayor gave heartfelt gratitude to her family in the audience at the news conference this morning. It was moving for many Americans, especially for Latino families and mothers who sacrifice to overcome great odds for the sake of their children.
There were lumps in throats and tears when she thanked her mother, Celina, and others in her family in the audience. It was a quintessential Latino moment showing reverence to mothers and the family unit. But even more important, it was an American moment for respect of the family foundation.
Such exposed emotions often are lacking when government appointees are nominated. Hers was the real deal, not something contrived for the Washington press corps or by a speech writer. It penetrated the hearts of Latinos and women reflecting on their relationship with their own mothers.
The president made a bold move to find a woman who also is a Latina. Her life story is compelling and will be repeated for many weeks to come. The president described her as “inspiring,” which indeed describes her life and ascending legal career.
Her experience is steep and her record lengthy. While the public still has much to learn about her legal opinions, she has one of the deepest legal portfolios among nominated Supreme Court justices.
Her life story also is dramatically refreshing. It will rule the headlines today. But the essence of how her nomination will fare will be based on her judicial temperament and intellect.
At age 54, she could have a long-term impact on a currently divided court for many years. The Senate owes the nation a thorough scrubbing of her past. Republicans already are marshaling their opposition by labeling her a liberal activist judge.
The Democratic majority in the Senate means she probably will be confirmed short of an unexpected revelation. Her experience and education at Ivy league schools, Princeton and Yale, would have served well a person with a different personal background. Her career credentials are unassailable.
A bilingual boricua (person of Puerto Rican descent) who could rise to such a powerful post was an untested concept. El Nuevo Día newspaper in Puerto Rico posted the headline ”Nunca Imaginé Este Momento” (I Never Imagined This Moment) after her introduction as the nominee.
This is a trumph of the best and the brightest. She just happens to be the first Latina and one of the few women who have made such history. She helps to quash the outdated label of a “qualified minority,” which implies that qualifications usually are lacking for women and minorities.
She will enter a very public and politicized grilling as her nomination moves forward. Her life story is truly extraordinary and ordinary at the same time. That makes it very compelling to many Americans.
Today she embodies the ideal of “Sí Se Puede,” a Spanish phrase that means “Yes we can,” for Latinos and women. But it is her legal acumen built as a prosecutor, trial judge, corporate lawyer and appellate judge that will determine whether she joins the highest court. And she is qualified to serve.



Gilbert Bailon has been editor of the P-D editorial pages since November 2007. Previously, he worked as a reporter, editor and executive editor for The Dallas Morning News and its daily Spanish-language newspaper, Al Dia. He still harbors a passion for all things Tex-Mex: food, music, language, boots and border culture. And yes he has found some of that in the Midwest.
I am SO glad we’ve gotten past the days of gender and race discrimination so that we can appoint a Latino woman to the Supreme Court…on the basis of her gender and race! Hooray for progress.
If she’s qualified to serve, write an article about her numerous qualifications and experiences in the legal profession that make her a good choice. Labeling your article and making insinuations about how this is a victory for minorities and women has nothing to do with whether or not this woman will serve the nation well and strictly interpret the constitution. It’s almost as if your comment of “she’s qualified to serve” is an afterthought with the main focus on the historic nature of the nomination. You’re a fool, Gilbert.
Look up Miguel Estrada, whom the Democrats borked in 2001. He was a “qualified minority” but obviously not a qualified liberal minority.
I being a Latina myself understand your point Mr. Bailon, unlike other readers who have posted who most likely are not latinos themselves.
Yes you’re previous reader is correct and Mr. Bailon you made it very clear yourself in this article …just because she was elected doesn’t mean she will serve but the fact that she was elected is a BIG Honor and already a VICTORY to us Latinos. This shows all Latinos “Que Si Se Puede” (Yes we can).
I agree with you that this a big honor for us Latinos and definitely a Victory already.
Huzzah, it’s a historic day for the working class. Since none of the other justices have worked their way up from humble roots, I guess.
For you negative “strict constructionists” here’s a link to a New Republic synopsis of her career.
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085
As for qualifications she was selected by Bush Uno to be a Federal judge and has also served as a prosecutor. She graduated from Princeton and Yale Law School. Sounds relatively qualified to me.
No usted no puede.
Two words, [and the ONLY two that matter to the O]—
—————JUDICIAL ACTIVIST——————————–!
I honestly couldn’t care less about this, but I find it interesting the Post is pushing the “compelling personal story” meme as if that really matters. There are any number of judges with more “compelling” biographies than this one. I think readers would rather know if she’s a good judge or not and the criteria used in making such a determination. That Obama picked a nominee based largely on leftist cred is hardly surprising.
Re: Goat Daddy — Every lawyer and judge ever disbarred or sent to prison was a law school graduate at one time. Some of the worst have come from Ivy League schools. That’s really not such a great qualification, is it?
Presisent Barack Obama pick of Sonia Sotomayor for the U.S. Supreme Court is both tactful and artful in the political world of Washington. Speaking as a
vet of the arm services (Navy #1), I wish my Commander In Chief success. If rush limbaugh, the entertainer who evaded arm services during Nam due to an anal cyst wishes failure, I side with the President. One thing Sonia has in
common with rush limbaugh is, ”qualified to serve”. Unlike rush, Sonia Sotomayor will serve our country well. Rush employed what everyone has plus
cyst to evade serving and protecting America from enemies.