How is it “breaking news” that Chad Johnson has changed his name? ESPN has really hit rock bottom with this crap. Guess what, Johnson has played you for the saps you really are.

Glad to see TLR throw down the gauntlet and put the heat on the front office. As was said the other day, the free pass has expired and the clock is ticking.

The Redskins may just be worse than the Rams, but that won’t help on Sunday:

Eagles – 31 Rams – 17

I’ll admit I can grumble about the bone-headed antics of team owners, coaches and general managers with the best of them. But has SW ever had anything good to say about them? When the Rams won the Super Bowl, did he complain and consider them a failure because they didn’t win by 30? What does SW stand for, anyway? Super Whiny?

Don the legend makes an appearance. Guess what, the complaining about S.W. schtick is already taken, find something else to complain about…

Bill Simmons used to be occasionally funny. Now he is dull and recycled…seems a perfect fit for Tipsheet actually.

Bellerive should be thoroughly destroyed by the end of this weekend, but at 90 grand a pop to join (90 grand!) they ought to have the dough to fix it back up…

Don, do you have a point? Maybe an opinion or counter to what I stated earlier? I guess you ran back to tell mommy that I hurt your feelings. Quit sucking your thumb and have a debate. You’re exactly what’s wrong with the “fans” in this town, ALWAYS drinking the kool-aid and never want to state truths or fact.

I think TLR is echoing what fans (some on this blog)have done and that is put Cards ownership on notice that they are expected to pony up the cash to make the team a top contender next year, or else. With significant salaries rolling off at the end of this year there will be no excuse for apathy in the free agent market. If DeWitt and company set idle this offseason, look for an Oakland Raiders type demise for the Cardinals over the next decade.

S.W. I always argue your points, but you never dare respond to me…why? Scared to have a debate? Too busy drinking the Slaten Kool-Aid?

“The Redskins may just be worse than the Rams…”

Is that your bandwagon today? If I remember the Giants lost by giving up 80 pts in their first two games last year and things worked out well for them.

Also, who should listen to you and your predictions? Remember, you promised the Cardinals wouldn’t win more than 60 games. Remember???? I won’t let that one go until, you have the balls to (in your words) debate.

You never respond unless its to the joe schmoes, who you can easily tear apart. You ignore the ones that just might make a point against your useless daily diatribes about conspiracy theories and the such (a la Kevin Slaten).

Now, all I ask is that you smile…you’ll like it.

Tim,

BTW, I am still waiting for your response to the LT comment. I understand your response of taking a shot at someone’s optimism, because that’s something that isn’t factual and you can’t back up with numbers, just opinions. However, my point about LT stands…and yet you avoid that part. Typical!

Way to play it safe and pick you battels.

Just for you I’ll misspelled battles above so you can just point out the spelling mistake and avoid talking about true sports facts

Sorry Really, I had to go back and look at the previous days to figure out what in the hell you were talking about. Turns out someone named just1beer made that comment about Jackson getting hurt the first game, not me. You responded to him with your “LT” question.

Calling me out to answer a question to someone else? Now that’s playing it safe cupcake.

Why don’t you delight us with another mirror reference while you are at it nimwit ROFL!

Touché!

I made a mistake and for that I am sorry.

As for the comment you did make: “Look at the history and quality of this roster.” What history am I to look at 2007 and that’s it? Or can I look at 2006 when Bulger threw for 4300 yrds and 24 tds? Jackson ran for 1500 and caught 800. Holt caught almost 1200. Do that year not count because it hinders your argument?

Now I don’t mind you saying look at last year, but try not to say look at the history of this team. I would say a few of the key players have had some great seasons. Last year? Maybe not. Are they past their prime? Maybe so. But we’ll have to see. But don’t diminish what they have accomplished over their careers based off of one lousy season. Do you really not see any upside on this team? It can’t get any worse!

For the record, I mostly agree with your thoughts (minus the love for hockey) but sometime do not (case in point). You make a lot of good points, and I like that fact that you are willing to have a discussion when people disagree on a topic. After all - isn’t that what a blog is for? Keep it up, and I look forward to many more spirited debates.

Also, I want to apologize for any person shots as well. That is out of character for me. I will keep it to sports from here on out.