Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
I still say the cards should pursue this
author
message

futuregm
Forum User
futuregm is offline 
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 5979
Post subject: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:07 pm
Per mlbtraderumors:

"The Rockies are willing to listen to trade offers for outfielder Brad Hawpe. Just last month, GM Dan O'Dowd said "We have no desire to move [Hawpe] at all."

"They'd like to add a righty bat to be a reserve outfielder or first baseman."


Ludwick for Hawpe Smile

Then sign Holliday to a 6 year/$108 million deal with no-trade clause.

1. Ryan
2. Schumaker
3. Pujols
4. Holliday
5. Hawpe
6. Rasmus
7. Molina
8. Freese
9. Pitcher

_________________


My Blog: unparalleledbaseball.blogspot.com
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

Fozzie
Forum User
Fozzie is offline 
Joined: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 608
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:19 pm
They're the same player.
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

Nuke LaLoosh
Forum User
Nuke LaLoosh is offline 
Joined: 09 Dec 2008
Posts: 5959
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:21 pm

Fozzie wrote

They're the same player.


Except Hawpe bats left-handed, no?

_________________
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees an opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

STLsportsfan1988
Forum User
STLsportsfan1988 is offline 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 3189
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:21 pm

Fozzie wrote

They're the same player.


No, Hawpe is a lefty. Just what the Cards need.

View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

buckc
Forum User
buckc is offline 
Joined: 30 Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:21 pm

futuregm wrote

Per mlbtraderumors:

"The Rockies are willing to listen to trade offers for outfielder Brad Hawpe. Just last month, GM Dan O'Dowd said "We have no desire to move [Hawpe] at all."

"They'd like to add a righty bat to be a reserve outfielder or first baseman."


Ludwick for Hawpe Smile

Then sign Holliday to a 6 year/$108 million deal with no-trade clause.

1. Ryan
2. Schumaker
3. Pujols
4. Holliday
5. Hawpe
6. Rasmus
7. Molina
8. Freese
9. Pitcher


With the possibility of retaining Holliday looking slim, I like the prospect of getting Brad Hawpe to fill the corner OF power void. Go get em Mo'

Rockies hoping to move Hawpe http://bit.ly/HINiS

View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

Fozzie
Forum User
Fozzie is offline 
Joined: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 608
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:26 pm
I think if Larussa lets Ludwick play everyday, he will surpsss Hawpe's numbers -- lefty/righty is irrelevant.
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

futuregm
Forum User
futuregm is offline 
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 5979
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:26 pm

Fozzie wrote

They're the same player.


hawpe is a patient hitter having walked 70+ times the last three years.

_________________


My Blog: unparalleledbaseball.blogspot.com
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

*STL_in_NOLA*
Forum User
*STL_in_NOLA* is offline 
Joined: 03 Nov 2008
Posts: 326
Location: New Orleans
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 15:55 pm

futuregm wrote



Ludwick for Hawpe Smile



Would that deal straight up get it done? It seems possible, maybe.
He's 30.
He makes 7.5 mil in 2010 and a 10 mil team option in 2011.
His best year, 2007, he hit 29 homers and drove in 116. thats the only season he has driven is 100. He has been fairly healthy the last 5 years. To me, he doesn't really seem like he offers the "protection" for Albert that even Luddy supplies. Plus, Ryan has already shown he can do it to some degree.

Luddy plays better defense as well.

I'm not really convinced, other than him being a lefty, that he is in any way a real improvement over Ludwick.

All things considered, (and by that i mean assuming we do not sign Holliday) I say Ludwick is more valuable top the Cards than Hawpe would be. I ain't trying to hate though. Hawpe is a good player.

View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

futuregm
Forum User
futuregm is offline 
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 5979
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 16:16 pm

*STL_in_NOLA* wrote

futuregm wrote



Ludwick for Hawpe Smile



Would that deal straight up get it done? It seems possible, maybe.
He's 30.
He makes 7.5 mil in 2010 and a 10 mil team option in 2011.
His best year, 2007, he hit 29 homers and drove in 116. thats the only season he has driven is 100. He has been fairly healthy the last 5 years. To me, he doesn't really seem like he offers the "protection" for Albert that even Luddy supplies. Plus, Ryan has already shown he can do it to some degree.

Luddy plays better defense as well.

I'm not really convinced, other than him being a lefty, that he is in any way a real improvement over Ludwick.

All things considered, (and by that i mean assuming we do not sign Holliday) I say Ludwick is more valuable top the Cards than Hawpe would be. I ain't trying to hate though. Hawpe is a good player.


the other option would be maybe they would take Allen Craig++ for hawpe

_________________


My Blog: unparalleledbaseball.blogspot.com
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

ace-king
Forum User
ace-king is offline 
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 2450
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 16:44 pm

Fozzie wrote

They're the same player.

Exactly - what have you gained? Same stagnant offense as this past year? "Should pursue this" - it ought to offer something special. THAT lineup is supposed to compete with the Phils/Dodgers???

_________________
one inexpert opinion
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

futuregm
Forum User
futuregm is offline 
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 5979
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 16:56 pm

ace-king wrote

Fozzie wrote

They're the same player.

Exactly - what have you gained? Same stagnant offense as this past year? "Should pursue this" - it ought to offer something special. THAT lineup is supposed to compete with the Phils/Dodgers???


Ummm, Holliday is in there, so yes it is.

3-4-5 OBP's in 2009

Pujols- .443
Holliday- .394
Hawpe- .384 (.372 on the road in 2009)

You don't think that is going to score runs? I trust Hawpe in the lineup a lot more than I do Ludwick given Hawpe has had a .380+ OBP for four straight years.

Last four years batting lines on the road:

2006- .303/.395/.571/.966
2007- .273/.368/.462/.830
2008- .287/.387/.477/.864
2009- .275/.372/.518/.890

You don't want that? Keep in mind that even in his great year, Ludwick had a OBP of .375 and this past year it was a paltry .329.

Now, yes, trading Ludwick for Hawpe may not be that productive, but maybe trading Allen Craig+ Kyle McClellan or Allen Craig++ for Hawpe would work since Colorado would like to add a RH batting reserve for OF and 1B.

Then spend money on Figgins, and you could have a lineup of:
1. Figgins
2. Schumaker
3. Pujols
4. Hawpe/Ludwick
5. Ludwick/Hawpe
6. Rasmus
7. Molina
8. Ryan
9. Pitcher

_________________


My Blog: unparalleledbaseball.blogspot.com
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

stape
Forum User
stape is offline 
Joined: 06 Apr 2003
Posts: 1285
Location: Vandalia, Illinois
Post subject: Re: I still say the cards should pursue this
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 16:56 pm
If you could get him without trading Luddy for him, great. But, trading Ludwick for him, IMO, still leaves us a bat short.
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote

All times are CST (CST6CDT)
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum