Kincaid wrote
Who would be hurt more by switching MLB off its current salary structure: the Yankees for having to limit their free agent spending and cut costs, or the Rays for having to pay Longoria, Pena, Price, Upton, Zobrist, Shields, and everyone else on the team fair market value instead MLB giving them those players for 6 years under heavily depressed salary control? How would the Marlins or Pirates or Royals react if, in addition to telling the Yankees they can't spend as much as they want, MLB also told those teams they have to start reinvesting close to the same proportion of their revenues into team payroll and have to put forth the money to keep around their stars rather than trade them away or else spend that money on other players, or that if they refuse to spend that money on their teams, they will no longer receive any revenue sharing payments?
Excellent point.
As much as a salary cap would seem to make sense, on the surface, there are some that claim that it would actually give teams like the Yankees a bigger advantage.
Large market teams would simply invest more in their farm systems and international development, and as long as the current system is in place, large market teams would simply outbid everyone else for international prospects.
_________________
Lotta poor man got the Cumberland Blues He can't win for losin'
Lotta poor man got to walk the line Just to pay his union dues.