EOM wrote
BarnBurner wrote
I don't agree with everything Murray does.
Personally, I would have parked Boyes, Carlo and Berglund in the pressbox for a couple of games each by now.
All I know, is that every single time, he is asked why he has done something - the answer always makes perfect sense to me.
Plus, unless they clearly demonstrate otherwise (see Mike Kitchens), I tend to think that a head coach probably knows a lot more about his team, and all the factors concerning it, than a simple fan like myself does.
I agree with his position that you make your own breaks.
If you do not have momentum - make it by doing something.
If you are not playing with confidence - make something happen, and you will be confident.
Waiting for someone to do it for you doesn't work.
I agree with his making rookies earn their way, not giving anything. It's the best thing for them, and the team in the long run.
Like all coaches, at some point, he will be replaced, but I don't think the Blues problems right now, are because of the coach. We have some players that are not paying the price for success, and the team by and large is not playing with desperation, like we say in the second half of last year.
That's a good point, but then why doesn't he treat the veterans the same way? I'm not saying he doesn't hold them accountable (even if we can't see it) but why are underperforming players like Boyes and Kariya getting more ice time than the youngsters? I think they've earned their way. Perron and Oshie have been excellent, Berglund is looking much better, and Eller had a very strong first game.
What exactly are young players learning by having to earn their way on to a bad team? Under Murray's watch, you have to play like the vets to earn playing time. OK, so disappear like Karyia, take dumb penalties like Tkachuk, and float, miss the net, and be a career minus player like Boyes, and you'll earn that playing time. Brilliant!