All right, here we
go for another ride at atop the cyber-Tsunami known as Joe Strauss
Live!!! I'm not certain, but I'm guessing there is a question or
two having to do with the Cardinals' young center fielder. Probably
another inquiry about the playoff chances and the minor-league
system. And, of course, we entertain all investment questions
related to college football. We apologize for last week's 3-3-1
downer. Let's climb the wave. We may even cut some boogie boarders
a little slack this week.
Joe since Ludwick will be
a free agent after this season do you think the Cardinals will be
in the running to try and get him back?
Joe Strauss: Ludwick is not a
free agent after this season. He is third-time
arbitration-eligible. Only if the Padres refuse to tender him a
contract would Lud' become a free agent. He is otherwise due to
attain free agency after the 2011 season. Gotta feeling the
questions get harder.
Watching last night's
5th inning where Lohse nicks the opposing pitcher and then walks
their lead off hitter after getting ahead on both 0 and 2 surely
would lead to disaster in that inning and cost the Cards another
game. My question is why not with the season most certainly long
lost now unless the Reds totally collapse, why not go with those
players where play time now can hopefully benefit the team over the
long haul? Certainly with Lohse still getting starts with little
hope to regain his command this year is more for next year-right?
How about more play time to Greene, Ryan, Anderson and Schumacher
who all are likely to compete for even more play time next year
versus playing Felix everyday and even Lopez once in a while where
both will probably be long gone by the start of next season? Also
why rest Rasmus against a tough southpaw now? Even Molina is
breaking down and figures to need two days off weekly as he plays
into his 30s, so why not sub him out more now?
Joe Strauss: Last night was tough
to watch -- for several reasons. Lohse helped bury himself by
committing the crimes you stated. It will be interesting to see if
TLR sends him out for a nationally televised start against the
Atlanta Braves. Or does Jeff Suppan return to the rotation? My
guess is Lohse returns. But his inability to dodge two-out damage
has become a concern.
I believe you may get your wish regarding more playing time for younger talent should the Cardinals fall out of contention for the wild card.
A number of fans share you concerns about Raz' inconsistent playing time against LH pitching.
Molina is playing on a sore right knee. It's not hard to tell. However, he brings a huge edge to his position even when diminished. TLR is reluctant to sacrifice that edge within a race.
I believe you may get your wish regarding more playing time for younger talent should the Cardinals fall out of contention for the wild card.
A number of fans share you concerns about Raz' inconsistent playing time against LH pitching.
Molina is playing on a sore right knee. It's not hard to tell. However, he brings a huge edge to his position even when diminished. TLR is reluctant to sacrifice that edge within a race.
Cards drafted
a SS by the name of Pete Kozma within last couple of years. How is
he progressing and is he on the horizon to replace Brendon "Toe
dancer" Ryan? I call him Toe Dancer because of his left foot when
he bats(nobody else has their foot in that kind of position when
batting). Thanks for your time!
Joe Strauss: Kozma, 22, endured a
mixed season at Springfield, hitting .243 with some power and
committing 34 errors. He remains a high strikeout guy who hits much
better against LH pitching than RH. He is in a tough spot since he
will always be remembered as the player the Cardinals selected in
2007 over Rick Porcello. If Kozma could smooth his defensive
inconsistencies, his ceiling would rise. He can still develop.
However, most see his potential as a major-league utility player.
He is scheduled to play in the Arizona Fall League. His performance
there should be worth noting.
Joe,
I dont understand why this Rasmus issue is getting so overblown. Are you hearing if both sides meaning Tony and him along with his father are going to work through this? I would like to see Rasmus back along with Tony. How do you think this will play out? Is Tony even coming back next year?
Thanks
I dont understand why this Rasmus issue is getting so overblown. Are you hearing if both sides meaning Tony and him along with his father are going to work through this? I would like to see Rasmus back along with Tony. How do you think this will play out? Is Tony even coming back next year?
Thanks
Joe Strauss: I personally think
the situation can be salvaged but only if the clubhouse offers the
player more support and the player exhibits a certain toughness
many have sought for several years. No doubt Rasmus' rookie season
sent him deeper into a shell. Paying dues is one thing, but being
hazed consistently does little to ease insecurities. It is not easy
being a rookie with this team. Shortstop Brendan Ryan said as much
this spring. It is a fair question who serves as a mentor to young
position players on this team. Chris Carpenter embraces the role
among the pitching staff. So does Ryan Franklin and, increasingly,
Adam Wainwright. Albert has long been more a leader by example.
However, my information is that since making some rather pointed
comments about Rasmus on Sunday, Pujols has approached the younger
player in a positive way. That would be an important, even
necessary first step.
I am unsure about TLR's plans but found it interesting that he would insist there is room for both he and Raz' in next year's clubhouse. Why make the comment if you are prepared to move on?
I am unsure about TLR's plans but found it interesting that he would insist there is room for both he and Raz' in next year's clubhouse. Why make the comment if you are prepared to move on?
What are the chances
we see Felipe Lopez in a Cardinals uniform in 2011?
Joe Strauss: I don't envision
that scenario.
Thanks as ever for
the forum. Given the lackluster finish of the Cards, are there any
untouchable players for this franchise going into this winter's
roster remake? If so, whom do you see as beyond reach?
Joe Strauss: Carpenter, Albert,
Holliday and Lohse have no-trade language in their contracts or
will have enough service time to veto a deal. Wainwright is de
facto untouchable. I'd assume the same for Garcia unless it was a
mega-deal for offense. Molina is considered a core player and is
probably in Wainwright's category. A year ago Rasmus would have
been classified as untouchable. The organization will likely gauge
his value in next winter's market. That is NOT to say they will
seek to move him, but Raz' may be in play in the right deal.
Mr. Strauss:
Regardless of what the manager has said (and I wouldn't expect him to say otherwise), if the discord between he and Colby Rasmus has gotten to the point that it is either "him or me" in 2011, then I hope the Cardinals choose Rasmus. Trading Rasmus to pacify the manager would be crazy. If I had to make the decision between Rasmus or the manager, I would go with Rasmus hands down. It's highly unlikely the manager will be in the dugout for the next 10 plus years, but Rasmus very well could be. And what a shame it would be to see Rasmus reach his full potential with another team.
If it truly is a "him or me" situation, and you had to make the decision between either the manager or Rasmus being with the Cardinals in 2011, who would you choose?
Thanks, Bruce
Regardless of what the manager has said (and I wouldn't expect him to say otherwise), if the discord between he and Colby Rasmus has gotten to the point that it is either "him or me" in 2011, then I hope the Cardinals choose Rasmus. Trading Rasmus to pacify the manager would be crazy. If I had to make the decision between Rasmus or the manager, I would go with Rasmus hands down. It's highly unlikely the manager will be in the dugout for the next 10 plus years, but Rasmus very well could be. And what a shame it would be to see Rasmus reach his full potential with another team.
If it truly is a "him or me" situation, and you had to make the decision between either the manager or Rasmus being with the Cardinals in 2011, who would you choose?
Thanks, Bruce
Joe Strauss: The organization
can't allow such a situation. Rasmus is a valuable asset. So is
TLR. It's not my decision who stays or goes. But remember that
ownership moved against a former general manager who chose not to
play nice with player development. TLR is a on a year-to-year
contract. Should he make such a demand -- something TLR insists he
would never do -- he may find there are limits to organizational
support.
TLR is a pragmatist. If Rasmus is shipped elsewhere without a suitable replacement, how does that better the club? Remember, the showdown with Scott Rolen occurred after shoulder surgeries had eroded Rolen's production.
TLR is a pragmatist. If Rasmus is shipped elsewhere without a suitable replacement, how does that better the club? Remember, the showdown with Scott Rolen occurred after shoulder surgeries had eroded Rolen's production.
I'm sick of you not
taking my questions just because I call u on ur stuff. Earlier in
the year u were telling anyone that would listen that we had no
young players any team wanted. That was not true. We had one
screaming to be traded in Rasmus. So what r u going to say
now--that we could not have gotten another young player in return
that was more mature and didn't put this team through nonsense this
whole year? That would not have been hard IMO--look at Jay he plays
the game right and is a rookie--how hard is it to find a young
mature player? Perhaps we could have gotten Haren back and/or
underachieving Upton from Arizona--I don't know but we could have
gotten value for Rasmus from some team that's for sure. So u,
Bernie and Mohendry can WAIT UNTIL THE COWS COME HOME For Rasmus to
grow up--which BTW may never happen. U guys r probably waiting for
the Easter Bunny too.
Joe Strauss: The meds haven't
arrived this week, have they?
Hi Joe. Why did
Mo not get us some help,a power bat before the Aug trade deadline??
I know we traded one,Ludwick to the Paders but we never replaced
him. Why? I dont by into the Rasmus being hurt thing BECAUSE we
have not done any better since he has been back. We needed Rasmus +
1. It reminds me of 2 years ago when Mo did not get us help at the
dead line & we crashed & burned just like this year. What
do you think? THANK YOU. Bryan
Joe Strauss: 2008 was a different
case. Trade deadline inactivity was basically a vote of
no-confidence for a team the front office did not believe could run
down the Cubs. This year is a different situation. The club dealt
Ludwick while in first place because it believed a.) David Freese's
return from the disabled list was imminent, and b.) Concerns were
mounting about the rotation's stability. Those concerns, it should
be noted, have been confirmed by Kyle Lohse's halting return from
the DL. A move for Miguel Tejada before the deadline could have
compensated for Freese's loss. But Freese's right ankle blew apart
two days after the deadline passed. Would you have liked Manny
Ramirez? Some within the clubhouse thought it a good gamble to
take. The front office disagreed.
Let's suppose
LaRussa opts not to come back. Any chance we can secure Bobby
Valentine as the new manager?
Joe Strauss: I'm sure Valentine
would listen intently. However, I question whether he represents a
fit for this organization at this time. If TLR leaves, his name
will come up, I'm sure.
Hey Joe,
Here's one for you. Why can't the Cardinals beat a left handed pitcher? Statistics prove right handed hitters hit better against lefties and vice versa. Since our main everyday players are right handed batters (Pujols, Holliday, Molina, even Ludwick before he left) why do most southpaws we face suddenly morph into Sandy Koufax. I don't get it, do you?
Here's one for you. Why can't the Cardinals beat a left handed pitcher? Statistics prove right handed hitters hit better against lefties and vice versa. Since our main everyday players are right handed batters (Pujols, Holliday, Molina, even Ludwick before he left) why do most southpaws we face suddenly morph into Sandy Koufax. I don't get it, do you?
Joe Strauss: Well, Idiot, you ask
a solid question. As we speak the Cardinals are 12th in the NL in
OPS (.706)against LH pitching. Only the Mets, Dodgers, Pirates and
Astros are worse. In previous years the Cardinals have had one
(Pujols) or more players who destroyed LH pitching (Rolen was among
them). Pujols' numbers against lefts are good but more mortal
(.291, 1.018) this season. Matt Holliday has been solid against LH
pitching (.328, .930 OPS) but none of the team's college of No. 5
hitters has been especially effective against it. (Molina, for
example, is hitting only .211 against LHP.) None of the team's
projected table-setters (Schumaker, Ryan, Lopez) has an OBP of more
than .333 against lefts. Indeed, Lopez is the only one of the three
above .300. If anyone had the answer, the problem probably wouldn't
have persisted for so long.
Joe, Some
players go out on top when they retire. Many more have to get
forced out by declining abilities and failure to get a contract
offer. Which will Tony be? The same skills that will put him in the
Hall of Fame seem to be failing. Baseball has changed in the last
few years and I fear Tony has failed to keep up with those
developments. May you always continue as Master of the Great
Tsunami.
Joe Strauss: I've offered the
opinion repeatedly that is not a comfortable roster for Tony to
manipulate. The bench has been an issue all season. The power drag
since the Ludwick deal demands the team typically must generate
three hits to score a run. Lacking speed and mounting injuries have
made it difficult for TLR to "push" with this lineup.
The other stuff -- media relations, dugout dust-ups -- are in the eye of the beholder. TLR has exhibited less patience with the post-game dog-and-pony show. Some is understandable. However, his reluctance (refusal?) to answer what he calls "big-picture" questions after a loss isn't merely a slap at the media, it's a rebuke of a fan base that wonders about the same issues. I seriously doubt making someone feel small in a postgame setting soothes the sting of a loss. The organization seems fine with it, however.
The other stuff -- media relations, dugout dust-ups -- are in the eye of the beholder. TLR has exhibited less patience with the post-game dog-and-pony show. Some is understandable. However, his reluctance (refusal?) to answer what he calls "big-picture" questions after a loss isn't merely a slap at the media, it's a rebuke of a fan base that wonders about the same issues. I seriously doubt making someone feel small in a postgame setting soothes the sting of a loss. The organization seems fine with it, however.
Good morning, Joe
Greetings from the surprisingly a pathetic (at least in attendance) home of the Reds as we few Cardials' fans try to resist the anti-St. Louis wave here. I'm submitting this early so I might attend an out-of-town meeting.
A comment and a question, if you will grant me an answer, sahib:
A season contains many "turning points." To me, one of them was when Aaron Miles muffed the double-play ball this past Saturday against Cincinnati. It gave the Reds a 3-0 lead and in my opinion, forced Adam Wainwright out of his game, which would have been a one-run game for most of it--instead of a near-blowout. The trite phrase "hindsight is 20-20" applies here, but I feel it was a "turning point." Agree?
2) Reds' broadcaster Marty Brennaman, never known for hiding his opinions, said on the air Friday that he had an unnamed high-ranking official "on the Cardinal club" tell him "this team is dysfunctional." Question: why would that source say that and is it true?
Thanks, as always, for your time in doing these chats!
Greetings from the surprisingly a pathetic (at least in attendance) home of the Reds as we few Cardials' fans try to resist the anti-St. Louis wave here. I'm submitting this early so I might attend an out-of-town meeting.
A comment and a question, if you will grant me an answer, sahib:
A season contains many "turning points." To me, one of them was when Aaron Miles muffed the double-play ball this past Saturday against Cincinnati. It gave the Reds a 3-0 lead and in my opinion, forced Adam Wainwright out of his game, which would have been a one-run game for most of it--instead of a near-blowout. The trite phrase "hindsight is 20-20" applies here, but I feel it was a "turning point." Agree?
2) Reds' broadcaster Marty Brennaman, never known for hiding his opinions, said on the air Friday that he had an unnamed high-ranking official "on the Cardinal club" tell him "this team is dysfunctional." Question: why would that source say that and is it true?
Thanks, as always, for your time in doing these chats!
Joe Strauss: It was a huge play.
Wainwright was an out away from pitching out of the jam but instead
absorbed three unearned runs. The Cardinals lost and probably saw
any chance of running down the Reds evaporate. However, it took
many similar plays by a number of players this season to reach this
position. To use Miles as a pincushion may be a little harsh. In
previous years I could look down and scribble "DP" on a
routine-looking grounder with men on base. This year I wait until
the play is made. The scorer's phrase "can't assume a double play"
has never been more appropriate locally.
I have tremendous respect for Marty. He wants the Reds to succeed but is quick to critique what is wrong.
Let's put it this way: The questions posed in last Sunday's P-D were not asked in a vacuum. Marty's source probably said it because he perceives it to be true. It may be a more valid question to what extent ownership remains insulated from these issues.
I have tremendous respect for Marty. He wants the Reds to succeed but is quick to critique what is wrong.
Let's put it this way: The questions posed in last Sunday's P-D were not asked in a vacuum. Marty's source probably said it because he perceives it to be true. It may be a more valid question to what extent ownership remains insulated from these issues.
Morning, Joe.
You know when Hummel starts getting Tony’s snippy quotes into his
usually straight-laced gamers that The Boss has gone off the deep
end. Lohse is “a targeted Cardinal”? Well, yes. That’s because what
Lohse lacks in actual talent he makes up for in being rather
expensive.
Tell me, has the manager, for lack of a better phrase, “lost it” this year?
He seems to be saying and doing stranger and stranger things be it handling players, media, lineup or the challenges of day-today baseball life. I remember him pulling a lot of this madness in Oakland in 1995; my dad remembers the shambles he left the Sox in in 1986.
You put Albert’s return at 50-50 or so. What about Tony?
Tell me, has the manager, for lack of a better phrase, “lost it” this year?
He seems to be saying and doing stranger and stranger things be it handling players, media, lineup or the challenges of day-today baseball life. I remember him pulling a lot of this madness in Oakland in 1995; my dad remembers the shambles he left the Sox in in 1986.
You put Albert’s return at 50-50 or so. What about Tony?
Joe Strauss: I honestly don't
know. But I'd agree most of those who follow the team have detected
a different vibe this season. It's interesting. Most of those on
the receiving end of his "answers" have shown him tremendous
respect over the years. To me, that suggests a frustration that
extends beyond those in the room.
I was listening
to the Cardinals while driving last night, and Mike Shannon was on
the air. He said something like, "Not much enthusiasm for a team
that needs to put together a long winning streak. Looks like just
another ho-hum day at the ball park." Wow, you know something’s
wrong when Shannon starts ripping them. Usually Mr. Positive. Your
thoughts Joe?
Joe Strauss: I didn't hear the
quote to which you refer. But Mike is certainly entitled to be as
baffled by this bunch as the rest of us.
Super surfer:
I've asked this question for a couple of weeks. I know you can't get to them all, and also understand you need to be careful about what you say and who you say it about if you want continued access in that clubhouse. But one more time:
Your thoughts or observations on Mark McGwire's performance as hitting coach? With the inconsistent offense as the team's #1 problem, I am curious about how the players are relating to him and how he fits in with the Don Tony management team.
I've asked this question for a couple of weeks. I know you can't get to them all, and also understand you need to be careful about what you say and who you say it about if you want continued access in that clubhouse. But one more time:
Your thoughts or observations on Mark McGwire's performance as hitting coach? With the inconsistent offense as the team's #1 problem, I am curious about how the players are relating to him and how he fits in with the Don Tony management team.
Joe Strauss: There are just as
many questions regarding composition of the roster. To lay this all
on McGwire is very convenient. Is McGwire experiencing a learning
curve? Absolutely? Was it a risky, even arrogant move to bring him
on as hitting coach with a contender? Very possible. Bud did the
front office authorize the move prior to TLR committing to return?
Darn tootin'. A number of players have sought outside help (not
just Rasmus) either from teammates, assistant Mike Aldrete or
relatives. McGwire's performance is under review. I have no idea
how it will be evaluated.
Joe:
Just about every post I've seen on this website seems to assume that Tony fed you the story about Colby asking to be traded. I've noticed that your original story only reported that Tony "confirmed" the trade request. Can you clarify whether the original information came from Tony, or from someone else?
Just about every post I've seen on this website seems to assume that Tony fed you the story about Colby asking to be traded. I've noticed that your original story only reported that Tony "confirmed" the trade request. Can you clarify whether the original information came from Tony, or from someone else?
Joe Strauss: Anybody who assumes
TLR "fed" the story to the Post-Dispatch is completely clueless. If
it was true, you wouldn't be reading my answer in this space. TLR
was asked about it in a group setting Sunday. He had two choices:
confirm what had been already printed or lie. He chose not to
lie.
Chatmeister,
You've been in a number of Cardinal clubhouses...I imagine there is a kind of swagger, professionalism or "it" factor when you walk into a winning clubhouse. Even during the good times this year, did the team have the "chemisty" we speak of so much? What other year would you compare this clubhouse to?
Thanks!
You've been in a number of Cardinal clubhouses...I imagine there is a kind of swagger, professionalism or "it" factor when you walk into a winning clubhouse. Even during the good times this year, did the team have the "chemisty" we speak of so much? What other year would you compare this clubhouse to?
Thanks!
Joe Strauss: The answer to your
question: 2003. At tne end of that season, you might remember, the
team cut loose a part of its alleged core (Tino Martinez). That
team had gross bullpen deficiencies just as this team is
handicapped on offense.
Joe, I have a few
questions.
Last night why did no one question LaRussa on his benching of Ryan when he has been playing brilliantly at ss? Is there any doubt in your mind that he makes that play last night in the first inning? That cost us 2 runs. Also, why keep running Lopez out there when he is mired in a horrific slump and Schu is hitting much better as of late? Has Tony ever heard of momentum?? Do you think this team is better when Ryan plays?
Last night why did no one question LaRussa on his benching of Ryan when he has been playing brilliantly at ss? Is there any doubt in your mind that he makes that play last night in the first inning? That cost us 2 runs. Also, why keep running Lopez out there when he is mired in a horrific slump and Schu is hitting much better as of late? Has Tony ever heard of momentum?? Do you think this team is better when Ryan plays?
Joe Strauss: You don't play the
game in reverse. TLR made a call based on match-ups. The situation
found Greene. It happens. I'm sure TLR is trying to keep Flip
"live." However, Lopez has shown little since requiring a second
procedure to alleviate tightness in his knee. He became overexposed
at third base, for whatever reason, and has not reverted to his
historical form. Carpenter and Wainwright think it a better team
when Ryan plays. (See: lineups) I'm not arguing with them.
Joe, any word on whether
Pujols sought out Rasmus after calling him out in the press? Was
wondering if there is now (or maybe already was) a rift between the
two. Seems like AP was quick to throw Colby under the bus after the
trade request thing was made public.
Joe Strauss: I'm hearing the two
have spoken since Sunday and that the tone was far more
conciliatory.
Oh Mighty
Chatmeister:
What benefit did TLR gain by exposing Rasmus trade request (granted the Chatmeister had reported the story earlier)? Is this a diversionary tactic to remove heat from himself for the gag effort on the last road trip?
Is Ramus standoffish or just a shy southern boy miscast on this team?
Do the Bravos or Friars choke away a playoff spot?
Give us college football wisdom for week 2.
As always, keep ridin the wave
What benefit did TLR gain by exposing Rasmus trade request (granted the Chatmeister had reported the story earlier)? Is this a diversionary tactic to remove heat from himself for the gag effort on the last road trip?
Is Ramus standoffish or just a shy southern boy miscast on this team?
Do the Bravos or Friars choke away a playoff spot?
Give us college football wisdom for week 2.
As always, keep ridin the wave
Joe Strauss: Again, what was TLR
supposed to do? Do you lie to a room full of reporters, including
one who reported the incident? Rasmus is a young player who has
never felt totally secure within his clubhouse. You might ask why
that is so. The team's caste system has supported it. Rasmus, who
can be stubborn or prone to "shut down" when scolded, has fed it.
It's a situation that has fed on itself. Interesting, isn't it,
that for a long time TLR denied any issues involving Rasmus.
Clearly, it would seem, issues have been constant. The Cardinals
have shown themselves more than willing to dismiss legitimate
issues based on the assumption that media would quit asking. To
suggest that the front office had no knowledge of Raz' July trade
request is at least disingenuous. Rasmus describes his relationship
with John Mozeliak as "tight." The manager also speaks daily with
the GM. An issue the manager confirms has arisen twice and the
front office is unaware. Funny stuff. And I've got a village beyond
the LCF wall for sale as well.
Despite last night's
disappointing loss, watching Trevor Hoffman get his 600th career
save seemed like a special 'baseball moment' for one of the good
guys in baseball who's paid his dues over time despite having
struggled this year for the disappointing Brewers. What was your
impression of his accomplishment last night and the post-game
celebration the Brewers threw for him?
Joe Strauss: Perfectly
appropriate. Sorry to see some of the reflexive dissing levied by
the spreadsheet crowd that dismisses saves as a phony stat. Next
thing you know they'll be referring to a 19-game winner as "lucky."
Oh, wait, that's already happened.
El Diablo -
It seemed like Tony went out of his way to praise Jocketty during the weekend series against the Reds. I know there is a lot of history between those two, but didn't the timing and enthusiasm of those comments seem odd? Any chance this was meant as a vote of no confidence in the current Cardinal GM/front office, or am I reading too much into this?
It seemed like Tony went out of his way to praise Jocketty during the weekend series against the Reds. I know there is a lot of history between those two, but didn't the timing and enthusiasm of those comments seem odd? Any chance this was meant as a vote of no confidence in the current Cardinal GM/front office, or am I reading too much into this?
Joe Strauss: Many shared your
take on a well-written piece that appeared in the New York
Times.
-El Diablo-
Wanted to give you a shout out and say great reporting over the past week. You guys all do such a great job covering the Birds.
Ok, this could get windy. Albert constantly is says that he puts the team and winning first. No matter what his stats are, he claims that they are not as important.
He is in the running for an MVP, obviously. However, if the birds fail to make the postseason, he would like lose out to Votto. Votto has a great supporting cast.
Albert doesn't have a great supporting cast, therefore he might not go to the postseason or win the MVP. Why doesn't Albert have a great supporting cast of player around him? Because Albert and his contract negotiations are hampering this club from spending any money. I hated to see Ludwick traded, but I can totally understand why the organization did it.
Is Albert genuine when he says the winning is most important to him? Does he not see the correlation to his lack of signing and the front office not spending money on supporting players?
Quite frankly, I'm sick of the hypocrisy and of hearing him say that he just wants to win.
Wanted to give you a shout out and say great reporting over the past week. You guys all do such a great job covering the Birds.
Ok, this could get windy. Albert constantly is says that he puts the team and winning first. No matter what his stats are, he claims that they are not as important.
He is in the running for an MVP, obviously. However, if the birds fail to make the postseason, he would like lose out to Votto. Votto has a great supporting cast.
Albert doesn't have a great supporting cast, therefore he might not go to the postseason or win the MVP. Why doesn't Albert have a great supporting cast of player around him? Because Albert and his contract negotiations are hampering this club from spending any money. I hated to see Ludwick traded, but I can totally understand why the organization did it.
Is Albert genuine when he says the winning is most important to him? Does he not see the correlation to his lack of signing and the front office not spending money on supporting players?
Quite frankly, I'm sick of the hypocrisy and of hearing him say that he just wants to win.
Joe Strauss: It's only fair to
withhold judgment until we see how negotiations play out. Again, no
one has yet defined what it means to "take less" in Albert's
case.
what do you know about
albert's health. he hasn't hit a ball hard in two weeks.he's
wearing the sleeve on his elbow. is this the same problem as last
year in september when he had no power?
Joe Strauss: Last year's issue
was a right elbow that required October surgery. The left elbow is
giving him problems now, along with a right ankle that twisted
climbing the Nationals Park tarp almost two weeks ago. He
experiences varying degrees of back stiffness. He's hurting right
now.
Chatmeister, I'm fully
prepared for the harsh consequences of complimenting one of your
colleagues. I really enjoyed Bernie's article yesterday about why
the Cardinals should not grant Colby Rasmus's wish to be traded. I
had been of the opinion that if Colby wants to be traded, trade
him. We can get a lot for him, and if he doesn't want to be here,
he'll be a hinderance to the team. Bernie has me swayed. In
addition, Colby seems to have come alive the past few days. I'm
curious for your take--trade him or keep him around and tell him to
grow up? Thanks for your tough love and brutal honesty (if I want
warm and fuzzy, I'll catch Gordo on Mondays or--gasp!--read Bird
Land).
Joe Strauss: I thought Bernie
made several salient points. In a perverse way, Sunday's airing of
dirty laundry may pave the way for an improved environment for
Rasmus. As stated earlier, my information is that Albert followed
his public scold with an extended meeting with the young CF. Hey,
your reading habits are up to you.
Hey Joe,
Been wondering since I've heard you and others talk about the possibility of the Cards re-signing Jake Westbrook at season's end, but I was curious as to if this is a an actual possibility and how much money it would cost to keep him? Could they do a one-year deal? Two-year?
If they can't re-sign him, who are other potential targets for the Cards fifth pitcher with Carpenter, Wainwright, Garcia, and Lohse all in play for next season?
Not that he would be that great, but he would give the team some insurance to start next season, could the Cards keep Suppan while only having to pay him the major league minimum next season?
Been wondering since I've heard you and others talk about the possibility of the Cards re-signing Jake Westbrook at season's end, but I was curious as to if this is a an actual possibility and how much money it would cost to keep him? Could they do a one-year deal? Two-year?
If they can't re-sign him, who are other potential targets for the Cards fifth pitcher with Carpenter, Wainwright, Garcia, and Lohse all in play for next season?
Not that he would be that great, but he would give the team some insurance to start next season, could the Cards keep Suppan while only having to pay him the major league minimum next season?
Joe Strauss: Westbrook would
likely be addressed before reaching free agency (a la Pineiro).
Suppan would be an issue to to be revisited very late in the winter
(a la Dumpster Dive). The Cardinals are unlikely to commit three
years to any other starting pitcher at this point. Westbrook's best
bet to stay here would be within a 1-year framework or possibly
with an option attached. (Think: Penny.)
You have recently
downgraded the chances of re-signing Pujols to 50%. Is that issue
still trending down? I have been one of the few fans advocating a
Pujols trade due to the economic realities of the situation. How
does a team work within a $100m budget when two players would/could
comprise almost 50% of that? I would package Pujols and Lohse to
Boston for Bucholz, Youkilis, and their top prospect. I see no
other way unless ownership plans to bump payroll.
What is your take on the whole situation?
What is your take on the whole situation?
Joe Strauss: My take is the same.
I rate it a coin flip whether Pujols remains. Payroll would have to
expand to about $110 million if he stays. No team is going to
assume Lohse's contract at this juncture. In addition, he enjoys
full no-trade protection.
Hello Joe,
Could you please tell me why the Cardinals never pursued Placido Polanco after letting him go? I believe that was a big mistake first off. The guy was always so dependable, always put the ball in play, reliable defense, and has just been a consistant performer year in year out since. He is also very cheap, considering what he brings to the table. Do you think the Cardinals could pick him up in trade since he is still under contract with the Phillies. Always, thanks for the input.
Dustin
Could you please tell me why the Cardinals never pursued Placido Polanco after letting him go? I believe that was a big mistake first off. The guy was always so dependable, always put the ball in play, reliable defense, and has just been a consistant performer year in year out since. He is also very cheap, considering what he brings to the table. Do you think the Cardinals could pick him up in trade since he is still under contract with the Phillies. Always, thanks for the input.
Dustin
Joe Strauss: David Freese costs
$400,000. The club convinced itself he would be a power hitter at
the next level. Enough said. The club bound itself to Skip
Schumaker when it signed him to a two-year extension in January.
Polanco is within a three-year $18 million contract. I wouldn't
call that "very cheap."
Oh great Rider
of the Waves: I keep hearing that the Cards need a middle
infielder, preferably a second baseman, who is a plus offensive
player. I agree, but those are somewhat rare animals. Who is
available? Thanks.
Joe Strauss: Very premature. The
non-tender deadline and free agency will factor. It's very
difficult right now to see who make make a pricey arb-eligible
player available early this offseason.
Oh great one,
Aside from a minor miracle, what do you think it would take for the Cardinals to realistically make it or the playoffs?
ZakkW
Aside from a minor miracle, what do you think it would take for the Cardinals to realistically make it or the playoffs?
ZakkW
Joe Strauss: A complete collapse
by the Braves, which the Cardinals can facilitate this weekend in
Atlanta.
Joe, I'm not seeing a
scenario in which Tony/Duncan can co-exist with Mo/Luhnow. The
Rasmus situation is a symptom of something larger. Mr. DeWitt is
eventually going to have to choose sides.
Am I close, or have I wandered into the deep end again?
Am I close, or have I wandered into the deep end again?
Joe Strauss: There is an issue
there but it is less obvious than during the final days of the
Jocketty regime. For now the organization appears more inclined to
publicly describe the disconnect as a media creation. It does so at
its own peril.
One plan that has
been mentioned frequently for 2011 is that Kyle McClellan would be
the #5 starter. I know he has shown well as a starter in spring
training, but spring training is not regular season. Are there any
plans to stretch him out for a couple of starts, since we have some
extra relievers and Lohse is having problems now? Seems to me that
it would solve a current need and answer some questions for next
year. The argument against it is "he's too valuable where he is
now", but that's baloney, starters make three times as much as
relievers for a reason.
Joe Strauss: Suppan and
Hawksworth are the emergency starters.
GOODMORNING,I JUST WANT
TO THROW THIS OUT HERE, I COULD SEE TONY COMING BACK NEXT YEAR. AND
IF THIS HAPPENS I SEE THE CARDS TRADING RASMUS AND RYAN MOVING SCHU
BACK OUT IN THE OUTFIELD. JUST TO PROVE A POINT FOR ONE TO COLBY.
YOURE THOUGHTS, AND THANKS.
Joe Strauss: Stop yelling. I am
of the opinion that Schumaker will at least become a hybrid player
next season, seen just as much (or more) in the outfield as at
second base.
Joe:
Taking time off from considering unified theories of physics, I've been thinking about why some of the BFIB hate Tony. Personality is a big part. Sparky Anderson would manage the same way and get one tenth of the vitriol. But, fans stuck in the 80's think there in one way to manage a game and one way only, and doing anything different threatens their self-concept. A lot of these people also thought laissez-faire manager Joe Torre, HOF bound, was a nice guy who just didn't have the ability to manage. The One True Way to Manage is Whitey small ball, ignoring that even Whitey wouldn't manage that way today. Sitting in the stands you can do simple righty/lefty match-ups, get the leadoff man on, and bunt him over, or better yet hit behind the runner and then stand and applaud the hitter who gave himself up, thus demonstrating to all your status of being just as smart as Whitey and a true BFIB. You can't demonstrate your own superior status and knowledge with Tony. He doesn't let you play along. He plays an individual match-up game where you have to know how each individual has fared against each of the other opposing players, what your guy had for breakfast and what other undisclosed ouchies and barks they have. One way isn't necessarily better than another, unless your a fan who craves validation as an equal. Since any baseball strategy is gong to succeed half the time at best, the only way to demonstrate you're a baseball genius yourself is to complain. And I love the rationalization that TLR's success doesn't justify his methods because he should have won every year, or at least "more", with the talent he's had. Whitey had one of the two most dominant NL teams of the 80's and he won one WS and two other LCS's. Drives me crazy. these fans are as egomanical as they claim Tony is. Sorry, Joe. Rant over.
Taking time off from considering unified theories of physics, I've been thinking about why some of the BFIB hate Tony. Personality is a big part. Sparky Anderson would manage the same way and get one tenth of the vitriol. But, fans stuck in the 80's think there in one way to manage a game and one way only, and doing anything different threatens their self-concept. A lot of these people also thought laissez-faire manager Joe Torre, HOF bound, was a nice guy who just didn't have the ability to manage. The One True Way to Manage is Whitey small ball, ignoring that even Whitey wouldn't manage that way today. Sitting in the stands you can do simple righty/lefty match-ups, get the leadoff man on, and bunt him over, or better yet hit behind the runner and then stand and applaud the hitter who gave himself up, thus demonstrating to all your status of being just as smart as Whitey and a true BFIB. You can't demonstrate your own superior status and knowledge with Tony. He doesn't let you play along. He plays an individual match-up game where you have to know how each individual has fared against each of the other opposing players, what your guy had for breakfast and what other undisclosed ouchies and barks they have. One way isn't necessarily better than another, unless your a fan who craves validation as an equal. Since any baseball strategy is gong to succeed half the time at best, the only way to demonstrate you're a baseball genius yourself is to complain. And I love the rationalization that TLR's success doesn't justify his methods because he should have won every year, or at least "more", with the talent he's had. Whitey had one of the two most dominant NL teams of the 80's and he won one WS and two other LCS's. Drives me crazy. these fans are as egomanical as they claim Tony is. Sorry, Joe. Rant over.
Joe Strauss: Manifesto done.
Sounds like you're of the belief that Cardinal Nation is comprised
of "baseball's most self-entitled fans."
Are Larussa and
Duncan's contracts both up at year end? If so is there a scenario
where one would return without the other?
Joe Strauss: My information is
Duncan potentially would return given a comfortable fit with the
next manager. That is partly based on well-informed speculation.
Circumstances for TLR's departure may factor in that stance,
however.
Have you heard
anything on Larue? Is this incidednt going to be how he ends his
career, or do you see another year as a backup here or elsewhere in
his future.
Joe Strauss: LaRue will turn 37
before next season. He has previously stated there are only a few
clubs he would extend his career to play for. The concussion has
certainly complicated any decision about his future. I would expect
to hear more in the near-term about his status. He is currently on
the 60-day disabled list and, thus, out for the season.
Joe,
What are your thoughts on Colby batting 6th and Molina 5th last night? Rasmus is clearly the 3rd best offensive player on the Cards current roster, so why is he down in the line-up. Why wouldn't you want a guy who is slugging around .500 in your 5 hole?
What are your thoughts on Colby batting 6th and Molina 5th last night? Rasmus is clearly the 3rd best offensive player on the Cards current roster, so why is he down in the line-up. Why wouldn't you want a guy who is slugging around .500 in your 5 hole?
Joe Strauss: I don't make up the
card. Molina's struggles against LH pitching this season have been
cited already. Molina was coming off a big game Monday. At this
point there are few good options.
Can you explain to me why
the Cards have invested so little $$ at 2nd and SS over the last
few years? Renteria was the last really big name they had at SS and
(correct me if I am wrong) Vina at 2nd. Sure they have had
"servicable" players there, but nothing substantial. Do they value
the positions differently than the others and if so, why? Seems
like if they invested just a little more money for one or the other
position (Hudson at 2nd, Furcal SS for example), they would have a
better foundation then putting 2 light hitting players in those
positions year after year.
Thanks for the time
Thanks for the time
Joe Strauss: The Cardinals
typically assign value to each position when budgeting. Second base
has seen the most turnover of any position in recent memory. Not
since Vina has the club dedicated more than $2 million for a single
player at the position. They've reached two World Series since
(Womack, Belliard). The method works when the rest of the team
achieves. It gets exposed when the rest of the team is accused of
underachieving. Under Mo', the club has addressed SS as an
overwhelmingly defensive consideration. Izturis and Ryan have
received most exposure there. The Khalil Greene deal punished the
organization for trying to bring offense to the role.
When is anyone
going to start holding Tony accountable for needless line up
changes. The record over the last two years is very clear on the
fact that when Ryan starts the team wins at a higher clip than they
do when he does not start. Who knows what happens last night if
Greene makes the play in the first inning. Does anyone not think,
particularly the way he has played the last two months, that Ryan
does not make the play? And the love affair with Lopez is simply
hard to explain.
Joe Strauss: When you take the
lineup card away from the manager, it's time to get a new
manager.
Happy High
Tide.
I think this comment will eventually turn towards Colby. Just don't know exactly how long it will take me to organize my thoughts.
Let's see if I have these facts correct.
In 2008 ownership\management was candid in saying a deal wasn't made because they felt the team was over performing.
In 2009 ownership\management was praised for going all-in. Didn't work out. I for one was thrilled with their effort.
This year ownnership\management goes on record to say payroll could be increased to improve the team. Yet, the biggest deal completed was basically a salary swap with Ludwick and Westbrook. This isn't a knock on Westbrook. Thrilled to have him as a Cardnial. Hope he stays. I do believe trading Ludwick have a far more negative impact on the team and the clubhouse than you would think a 2.30+ hitter would have. Is this mangagement group only interested in making the post season in odd numbered years? There had to be deal worth making.
I don't care how young or talented Colby is. I don't care how misunderstood his or how mistreated he feels he is. He could be a future HOFer. Move him now for a more professional professional. That was intentional. This team has the core to win a championship. The real shame would be to reflect on this core ten years from now and think - what could have been. Carp, Waino, Molina, Holiday, Albert won't be in their prime forever.
Sorry to see you won the spread with LSU/UNC. Heartbreaker. I'm getting used to it.
I think this comment will eventually turn towards Colby. Just don't know exactly how long it will take me to organize my thoughts.
Let's see if I have these facts correct.
In 2008 ownership\management was candid in saying a deal wasn't made because they felt the team was over performing.
In 2009 ownership\management was praised for going all-in. Didn't work out. I for one was thrilled with their effort.
This year ownnership\management goes on record to say payroll could be increased to improve the team. Yet, the biggest deal completed was basically a salary swap with Ludwick and Westbrook. This isn't a knock on Westbrook. Thrilled to have him as a Cardnial. Hope he stays. I do believe trading Ludwick have a far more negative impact on the team and the clubhouse than you would think a 2.30+ hitter would have. Is this mangagement group only interested in making the post season in odd numbered years? There had to be deal worth making.
I don't care how young or talented Colby is. I don't care how misunderstood his or how mistreated he feels he is. He could be a future HOFer. Move him now for a more professional professional. That was intentional. This team has the core to win a championship. The real shame would be to reflect on this core ten years from now and think - what could have been. Carp, Waino, Molina, Holiday, Albert won't be in their prime forever.
Sorry to see you won the spread with LSU/UNC. Heartbreaker. I'm getting used to it.
Joe Strauss: I'll address your
frustration simply: It does seem more than a misdemeanor that the
Cardinals may miss the third postseason in four years while
retaining the game's best player. That's a rather rare occurrence
within MLB's wild-card era.
Oh Rider of the storm
that is the 22' Grand Kahuna Wave,
Can the team's chemistry be changed by moving spare parts and role players? Seems like the Cards need a personality transplant, so would moving Flip Lopez out really be the answer? I'd love to think that the right combination of minor moves may lead to a better team spirit, but hit me with The Truth Chatmeister!!! I'm ready...
Can the team's chemistry be changed by moving spare parts and role players? Seems like the Cards need a personality transplant, so would moving Flip Lopez out really be the answer? I'd love to think that the right combination of minor moves may lead to a better team spirit, but hit me with The Truth Chatmeister!!! I'm ready...
Joe Strauss: I've never said or
implied that Flip was a clubhouse issue.
Wondering what
constructive ideas the Chatmeister has for Mizzou's schedule...
Seems they're committed to playing some number of games in Columbia
(hard to get non-conference opponents to play on road) and you're
looking at more Big-12 games soon. If the team could commit to a 4
year home-and-home with 1 other team, who would it be? (DO NOT SAY
MCNEESE!!?!?!?) ;)
Joe Strauss: Please... Mizzou has
wiggled out of series with competent opponents (UCLA, Iowa,
Illinois) for one reason: Better to assure yourself of a turkey
shoot than risk a loss. I love the concept of Illinois home and
home in odd-numbered years and Iowa home and home in even years.
Those are natural rival-type games that would remain draws
regardless of conference affliations. Playing an intersectional
game every third year would enhance the program's national
credibility. Unfortunately, San Diego St. and Nevada appear to
define Mizzou's "intersectional" reach. There's enough fluff in the
Big 12 that the suggested changes wouldn't create a crusher
schedule. Again, you are who you beat, which makes it tough still
to define who Mizzou is.
A question for you
while I'm wondering what Bernie REALLY thinks of Bob Davidson: When
will MLB stand up to the umpires union and stop giving these guys a
lifetime pass once they make it to "the show"? If, for instance,
the turnover of players in the bigs is say, 10%, why not grade the
umpires and tell the 10% with the lowest scores its back to the
minors or call it quits? I guarantee that the quality of umpiring
would improve and the prima donnas such as Balkin' Bob would shape
up or ship out. What say you?
Joe Strauss: The problem is that
many umpires are consistently rated worse than Davidson, including
media pal Joe West. MLB had its chance to turn out the worst of
them when the umpires struck more than a decade ago. However, many
were brought back. MLB could do the game a service by following
through on a pledge to construct postseason crews based on merit.
However, politics still hold sway.
Joe: Was Rasmus 'milking'
he's calf injury so much that it really required two weeks to heal?
Or was this a J.D. Drew type injury just to afford playing for
LaRussa?
Thanks, Rich
Thanks, Rich
Joe Strauss: There were those in
the organization who believed Raz' milked the injury. Rasmus, on
the other hand, saw what a premature return did to Ryan Ludwick a
month earlier. He erred on the side of caution. There may be a
bigger issue regarding medical projections that the team would
prefer not be discussed. Remember, Penny was supposed to be back in
2-3 weeks based on an initial front-office report. The issue is
touchy enough that the club now "suggests" that some players not
discuss their medicals with media. Ironic, since two years ago the
club said it would strain medical information to protect players'
privacy. Of course, the players best protect themselves by giving
an honest accounting of what's going on. See: Kyle Lohse.
Joe,
Why doesn't Albert want to be the clubhouse leader? What do you think of AP's stance of 'leadership by example on the field'? Do you think AP's way of thinking hurts the clubhouse...and especially for younger players?
Hang ten-
Why doesn't Albert want to be the clubhouse leader? What do you think of AP's stance of 'leadership by example on the field'? Do you think AP's way of thinking hurts the clubhouse...and especially for younger players?
Hang ten-
Joe
Joe Strauss: Albert can be an
intimidating presence to younger teammates and the organization
alike. He's not so much openly hostile. It's just that the
magnitude of his accomplishments, his focus on routine and his
belief in respect causes a number of younger or less accomplished
players to tread lightly. Relationships are usually on his terms,
which makes any outreach by him toward Rasmus even more
significant.
In your
opinion is Albert to banged up to go on a sustained tear?
Joe Strauss: I put nothing beyond
El Hombre. But he is dealing with a series of infirmities that
complicate any rush.
Mr. Strauss,
I believe you've previously written that the Cards are physically and mentally tired. How much of that can be related to the continual lineup changes? Except for the core, players don't know whether they're playing on any particular night, what position, and where in the lineup. I think most people, in any job, like some variety and some stability. My thought is this why TRL clubs often collapse in September and the playoffs; there's no energy left.
I believe you've previously written that the Cards are physically and mentally tired. How much of that can be related to the continual lineup changes? Except for the core, players don't know whether they're playing on any particular night, what position, and where in the lineup. I think most people, in any job, like some variety and some stability. My thought is this why TRL clubs often collapse in September and the playoffs; there's no energy left.
Joe Strauss: It may be an
element. This team frequently appears worn out.
Do you feel
you get honest answers to straight forward questions from Mo or
Tony, or any of the Cardinal braintrust, and if you don't feel
you've gotten the real goods, do you print it anyway?
Joe Strauss: Depends on the
question. I sat on a significant story earlier this year after
being told I had "bad information." The information regarding a
front office matter was absolutely correct but was withheld for
another two weeks before being doled out via press release. It
happens. But no apologies were offered. You report what you know. I
was solid with my information but held back out of respect to the
organization. You also learn. As a reporter, credibility is
currency. It's a two-way street. Some organizations value that
currency more than others.
Why didn't Tony/Mo
play Tyler Greene over Feliz? Yes, Feliz's defense is solid, but it
it not spectacular. And he's an absolute out machine on a team that
desperately needs lineup extension. Tyler Green has shown to be a
decent hitter and he has speed.
Joe Strauss: Depending on
situation, you may get your wish.
Is it
reasonable to say that this organization, top to bottom, lacks any
kind of unified focus or purpose? Everything I've seen and read
this season indicates that there's too much agenda and not enough
direction.
I was especially stunned at Pujols' comments re: Rasmus. I think this is the first time in recent memory he's taken any sort of public leadership role. Quite honestly, if he's the de facto clubhouse leader I wish he'd do this more often.
Still missing Will Clark.
I was especially stunned at Pujols' comments re: Rasmus. I think this is the first time in recent memory he's taken any sort of public leadership role. Quite honestly, if he's the de facto clubhouse leader I wish he'd do this more often.
Still missing Will Clark.
Joe Strauss: So noted.
That's going to be
a wrap for this week. Have gone long but only because of the wealth
of great questions. Sorry if I didn't get to yours unless you're
the joker who posted 40 times. Check Twitter tomorrow for this
week's CFB picks, if you care.
