We're well into
the season's countdown. Twelve games remain, including seven at
Busch, and even the local broadcast types have put away the
calculators for what it will take for the Cardinals to reach
postseason. General manager John Mozeliak is in Pittsburgh meeting
with the skipper. On Tuesday, the organization shut down Club Flip
after he showed up late the previous day in Miami. It's becoming
(more) apparent that not everyone on the Good Ship Cardinal has
been rowing in the same direction. To suggest that Lopez was the
only issue is naive. The Cardinals have played light for much of
the season within a no-fun atmosphere. The GM admitted as much
earlier this year despite TLR's denials. Let's call it what it is.
An underachieving first half compounded by personnel deficiencies
in the second half. When any team loses five of its last six to the
Pittsburgh Pirates, something is amiss. From the looks of things,
many of you are headed to the lifeboats. Season-ticket holders
first!!! No matter. Those in steerage have a voice here as well.
The Tsunami has crested the horizon. Hold on, it looks like a rough
ride.
--------------------------------------
Jake Westbrook has came
in here and pitched well enough in all games to give his team a
legit chance to win each one of them. Do you think he has done
enough for the the team to offer him arbitration as a Type B
restricted free agent when the time comes? I know his $11 million
base is substantial, but locking him in for 2011 would be the smart
thing to do and regardless of what goes on with Pujols-right?
Joe Strauss: Offering Westbrook
arbitration would be an extremely risky move since his acceptance
would virtually guarantee him a raise over this year's $11M salary.
My suspicion is the Cardinals will approach Westbrook in short
order if they have interest in continuing the relationship. They
worked deals with Pineiro and Lohse before the free agency filing
period and may do so with Westbrook. There is a significant
difference, however. The club locked up Lohse and Pineiro by
arguably giving them market or above-market deals for more than one
year. I doubt the club is in position to do so with Westbrook. I'm
unsure if Westbrook would commit to a one-year arrangement without
first testing the market. Doubt it.
ChatMeister - I've
been wondering this for several months - just how much influence do
you believe Keith Law and others in the sabermetric crowd had to do
with the outcome of the Cy Young voting last year?
Thank you, sir.
Thank you, sir.
Joe Strauss: Significant. Placing
Javier Vazquez as runner-up affected results that saw the guy with
the most first-place votes (Wainwright) finish third overall and
the guy who led the league in ERA (Carpenter) left off two ballots
entirely. Ten points separated first from third. If one voter who
had Tim Lincecum first and Carpenter third had reversed his vote,
Carp' would have won the vote. There increasingly appears a
campaign to discredit pitcher wins as a consideration. They are
considered by some as a derivative of "luck," much like RBI, in the
estimation of some spreadsheet voters. Law didn't give the vote to
Lincecum. However, there is an increasingly strong
smartest-guy-in-the-room element that frowns on more traditional
numbers now assigned the pejorative "peripherals." Personally, I
thought Wainwright the NL's best pitcher in 2009 only to later be
informed he was merely "luckier" than Lincecum. Who'da thunk?
Certainly a lack of
being fundamentally sound on defense was a major reason for the
demise of the team this year. Would you be in favor of Tony telling
Brendan Ryan (and the team) that starting shortstop is his job in
2011 before the team goes home in a few weeks because of his
potential to play stellar defense? How else can others on the team
address this overall concern in terms of a more productive off
season with the players already contractually committed to
returning next year?
Joe Strauss: I see little reason
for guarantees to be made after this season. The club needs to
examine all options how it may improve offensively. Ryan is a great
candidate for an otherwise strong offensive club. This team is not
strong offensively. How Mo' reconfigures the infield will be
intriguing to watch. It's also fair to wonder whether there will be
some organizational rethinking regarding the right field
situation.
Joe,
Tho questions if I may,
1) When a Cardinals team, or any team for that matter, has a mental funk like they endured this year is it fair to say that if you want to contend change is neccessary or will ownership simply cite this season as an underachieving hiccup and leave fans with a chance to experience more of the same?
2) All injuries set aside would you classify this year's Cardinal team as overated or underachieving?
As always thank you for the great insight.
Tho questions if I may,
1) When a Cardinals team, or any team for that matter, has a mental funk like they endured this year is it fair to say that if you want to contend change is neccessary or will ownership simply cite this season as an underachieving hiccup and leave fans with a chance to experience more of the same?
2) All injuries set aside would you classify this year's Cardinal team as overated or underachieving?
As always thank you for the great insight.
Joe Strauss: I'm not going to
speak for ownership or the front office. It's probably best to
watch what they do rather than go all-in on what is said. TLR or
Mo' wouldn't have said Monday they were going to release Flip on
Tuesday. My suspicision is there will be a thorough review, some of
which may chafe the manager. However, the philsophy that allowed
this club to enter the season with so little depth also deserves
serious review.
Chew on this: Since July 26, 2006 the Cardinals are 357-340. During that span they've won two division titles and a World Series; however, that number hardly suggests a dominant club, especially within the context of the game's weakest division. A club spending that much money within the NL Central should expect better results. This will be the third time in the last four seasons the best player in the game will not see the postseason. It will also become the longest drought under current ownership without a playoff win.
Based on Pythagorean Theorem that assumes a game above or below .500 based on every five runs plus or minus run differential, the Cardinals rank as the game's biggest underachievers. The Theorem assigns them no worse than an 83-67 mark rather than 77-73. In other words, they should be breathing down the Reds' necks. Overrated? Depends on who you asked in March. Research what was said in this space. The ChatMeister believed the Cardinals possessed the front-line talent to win a poor division but were dangerously thin, leaving them vulnerable to a dramatic tumble given injuries. Sound familiar?
Chew on this: Since July 26, 2006 the Cardinals are 357-340. During that span they've won two division titles and a World Series; however, that number hardly suggests a dominant club, especially within the context of the game's weakest division. A club spending that much money within the NL Central should expect better results. This will be the third time in the last four seasons the best player in the game will not see the postseason. It will also become the longest drought under current ownership without a playoff win.
Based on Pythagorean Theorem that assumes a game above or below .500 based on every five runs plus or minus run differential, the Cardinals rank as the game's biggest underachievers. The Theorem assigns them no worse than an 83-67 mark rather than 77-73. In other words, they should be breathing down the Reds' necks. Overrated? Depends on who you asked in March. Research what was said in this space. The ChatMeister believed the Cardinals possessed the front-line talent to win a poor division but were dangerously thin, leaving them vulnerable to a dramatic tumble given injuries. Sound familiar?
Joe,
For the integrity of the game, wouldn't TLR want Jaime Garcia starting a game in the final series vs Colorado? Obviously the West and/or Wild Card may be on the line there. Thanks.
For the integrity of the game, wouldn't TLR want Jaime Garcia starting a game in the final series vs Colorado? Obviously the West and/or Wild Card may be on the line there. Thanks.
Joe Strauss: I believe the
integrity of Jaime's health is the bigger issue.
Master of future and
past, isn't the answer to the Cardinals' problems unbelievably
simple? When did the Birds go into their swoon? When did TLR and
Albert go to the Glen Beckathon? All right, the latter happened a
LITTLE later, but not much later! Master of past & future,
hasn't TLR placed the EXACT same curse on the Birds that Gene Autry
did when he invited Nixon to sit in his luxury box in 1978? How
long was it for the Angels after that? Do the tea (party) leaves
lie, Master? 24 years? Will the Cardinals win before 2034, O Great
Prognosticator?
Joe Strauss: Let me guess: You
vote in the Democratic Primary.
Joe-
Just a hunch, but I'm thinking that there's a slight possibility that Felipe Lopez may not be back with the Cards in 2011.
Way back when, I thought that signing Lopez in Spring Training was an absolute steal. The guy hit .310 last year with 187 base hits! For the Cards, however, he went from semi-everyday player at insert-position-here, to everyday third baseman, to everyday second baseman (for about a week), to the Federal Witness Protection Program. This is one of the major disappointments of the 2010 season. What happened here, Joe?
Just a hunch, but I'm thinking that there's a slight possibility that Felipe Lopez may not be back with the Cards in 2011.
Way back when, I thought that signing Lopez in Spring Training was an absolute steal. The guy hit .310 last year with 187 base hits! For the Cards, however, he went from semi-everyday player at insert-position-here, to everyday third baseman, to everyday second baseman (for about a week), to the Federal Witness Protection Program. This is one of the major disappointments of the 2010 season. What happened here, Joe?
Joe Strauss: I do NOT anticipate
Flip's return. Lopez' performance declined precipitously after he
was scratched from the July 24 lineup against the Chicago Cubs due
to tardiness. The highlight of his season arrived the next night
when he lashed a game-winning home run on ESPN's Sunday night
stage. However, he since hit below .160, experienced knee stiffness
and sequestered himself in a corner of the Cardinals clubhouse he
called Club Flip. When he showed up late to the park Monday, it
gave the Cardinals cause to cut ties. The Washington Nationals
released Flip in 2008 before the Cardinals acquired him. He was
traded last season. Flip is a talented, versatile mercenary. It's
fair to say there was little motivation for him following last
month's acquisition of Pedro Feliz.
Joe,
Tony goes all fungo bat on Jack Clark's comments over the weekend and then his team mails in an hour fifty eight minute yawner in Florida. He's always said "when my message isn't getting through anymore..." Sure. And may the best shortstop in camp win the 1996 starting job. What do you think, 90% chance he's back?
Tony goes all fungo bat on Jack Clark's comments over the weekend and then his team mails in an hour fifty eight minute yawner in Florida. He's always said "when my message isn't getting through anymore..." Sure. And may the best shortstop in camp win the 1996 starting job. What do you think, 90% chance he's back?
Joe Strauss: I believe TLR is
back unless he hears something that he doesn't like from ownership
or the front office. As stated before, I'm all for calling out the
team if they're underperforming. But if someone wants to label them
"quitters", does he mean everyone or just certain guys.
The critique is sharper if names and examples are attached. Haven't heard those yet. I'll bet we never do.
The critique is sharper if names and examples are attached. Haven't heard those yet. I'll bet we never do.
Over the last few weeks
I've noticed Rasmus putting a lot more balls to the left side of
the field, and he just seems to be having better at bats. Think
it's a comfort thing, or did someone help him with his
approach?
Joe Strauss: You make a good
observation. Rasmus adjusted his stance recently and has achieved
greater plate coverage. He can drive the ball to left field but
hasn't shown home run power there yet. He appears more relaxed and
may have taken TLR's suggestion to heart that he not be so home run
conscious. There's another element to his game once Rasmus achieves
greater plate discipline. Rasmus also uses a pronounced leg kick as
a timing device, much the same as Matt Holliday. Some have
counseled Rasmus to reduce the kick, but it's the way he hits.
Comfort is an issue. Right now, Rasmus appears comfortable in the
box.
Dear SuperJoe,
What's your prognostication for who will man the keystone combination in 2011? I think Ryan and Schumaker are fine (as they showed in '08) if only the manager would play them consistently. When Schumaker hasn't played, I've been stumped as to why Miles (who hits lefties very well) usually wasn't the one to replace him. And Ryan's glove is too valuable to waste on the bench. Your thoughts?
What's your prognostication for who will man the keystone combination in 2011? I think Ryan and Schumaker are fine (as they showed in '08) if only the manager would play them consistently. When Schumaker hasn't played, I've been stumped as to why Miles (who hits lefties very well) usually wasn't the one to replace him. And Ryan's glove is too valuable to waste on the bench. Your thoughts?
Joe Strauss: As suggested here
before, it's highly likely the Cardinals will consider a different
role for Schumaker next season. He has value as an outfielder or as
a hybrid 2B/OF. He makes $2.7M, which is a lot for a bench player.
It will be interesting to note whether another club attaches
greater value to Schu' should the Cardinals decide to pursue
another second baseman. All that said, I believe Schumaker a very
important part of this team. He's a grinder and a team guy. He's an
example. Schumaker has been physically compromised for much of the
season, a factor in his diminished production and defense.
With Lopez gone whos
next? what do we have invested in Feliz after this year,also Lohse
too?? will Westbrook be on the winter roster or gone too. sorry
lots of questions in one setting thanks Joe for all the input all
season
kelly marrs
kelly marrs
Joe Strauss: Feliz and Westbrook
are pending free agents. I haven't heard any suggestion of more
releases.
Hi Joe. I saw a
rumor that the Rockies wanted Jake Westbrook for the rest of the
season,2 or 3 starts. Why would we trade him with less than 2 weeks
left in the season? I would not think we would get much for him or
anyone else at this point in the season?? Is Westbrook a type B
free agent or not ranked?? We just lost 1 HIGH draft pick in 2011
draft when we released Felipe Lopez yesterday. I dont understand
that eather?? What do you here about Westbrook & a trade to the
Rockies?
Joe Strauss: It's a rumor with
short legs. You assume the club is going to offer Westbrook
arbitration. You overlook the financial commitment should the
player accept. I question whether a compensatory pick is worth
assuming a $12-$13 million contract for a No. 4 starter. The
Cardinals were not going to offer Lopez arbitration, either.
Joe,
Are we really counting on Allen Craig, Tyler Greene, and Joe Mather to fill roles for us next year? Greene has had exposure for two years and to me has never shown much promise. Craig has struggled. Mather has been a sure out every time he comes to St. Louis. Couple these 3 with an inconsistent Brendan Ryan and Skip Schumaker, our offense will continue to be putrid next season! *Big breath* And then they're going to throw David Freese back out there, who really only played for a couple months with low power numbers. With no impact players on the verge, we look to be in a bad situation. Tell me that we're not going to rely on these crop of young players to have an impact next season, Joe!!
Are we really counting on Allen Craig, Tyler Greene, and Joe Mather to fill roles for us next year? Greene has had exposure for two years and to me has never shown much promise. Craig has struggled. Mather has been a sure out every time he comes to St. Louis. Couple these 3 with an inconsistent Brendan Ryan and Skip Schumaker, our offense will continue to be putrid next season! *Big breath* And then they're going to throw David Freese back out there, who really only played for a couple months with low power numbers. With no impact players on the verge, we look to be in a bad situation. Tell me that we're not going to rely on these crop of young players to have an impact next season, Joe!!
Joe Strauss: I believe events of
the last week may suggest a review of player development is well
under way. Two years ago Mather was briefly projected as Opening
Day third baseman. Craig is penciled by some as noe half of a RF
platoon next season. Greene could inherit Lopez' role as a utility
type. Individually, each of these players has value. However, when
you fill your roster with complementary players, problems such as
we've seen this year are to be expected. The opinion here is the
Cardinals require more proven commodities on the bench. A power bat
has been absent all season. This team has gone cheap(er) on bench
since the days of Spiezio and Taguchi. It's shown.
Joe:
Does Pujols realize that if he looks for the big payday from the Cardinals, it might hamper their ability to surround him with good players? (even if they add a little bit of payroll flexibility) He's already made about 90 million dollars playing, and no doubt, a nice amount from endorsements. Charlie Sheen's question to Gordon Gekko in Wall Street comes to mind, "How many yachts can you waterski behind? How much is enough?" Yeah, he's got great stats, but with him, we've only won 1 World Series, and he's been on the 2010 team all year, and they're not going anywhere. If we could get rid of Pujols and add a couple of everyday players (2nd base, SS, RF) shouldn't we at least consider it?
Does Pujols realize that if he looks for the big payday from the Cardinals, it might hamper their ability to surround him with good players? (even if they add a little bit of payroll flexibility) He's already made about 90 million dollars playing, and no doubt, a nice amount from endorsements. Charlie Sheen's question to Gordon Gekko in Wall Street comes to mind, "How many yachts can you waterski behind? How much is enough?" Yeah, he's got great stats, but with him, we've only won 1 World Series, and he's been on the 2010 team all year, and they're not going anywhere. If we could get rid of Pujols and add a couple of everyday players (2nd base, SS, RF) shouldn't we at least consider it?
Joe Strauss: Your Wall Street
reference gets you on the board. (One of the ChatMeister's favorite
fliks.) Your question is one the club has to answer -- and soon, in
my opinion. The Ryan Howard contract was a terrible development for
the Cardinals. That deal puts a $25M floor on Pujols' negotiations.
Years represents an additional complication. It's about to get
interesting. (P.S. To say, "We've only won one World Series"...
come on. Are you serious?}
With Franklin
adding a nuckler to his pitch selection - this made me think of
question. I remember over the years there were a number of
right-handers who had success throwing it. But was there ever a
lefty that had success throwing a nuckler? I can't think of
one.
Joe Strauss: Wilbur Wood
(1961-78) is probably the most famous. Started both games of a DH
for the Chicago White Sox. Gene Bearden and Bobby Shantz are other
examples. More recently, a guy named Kirt Ojala did so.
Mr. Meister of the Chat
and Surf!
According to LaRussa, Lopez was released mostly due to the fact he would get very little playing time the rest of the year. Who was behind that decision of playing time he would receive, LaRussa or Mozeliak? Does that also mean we will see less playing time for Pedro Feliz, Aaron Miles, and Randy Winn? Was there any other issues with Lopez besides tardiness? I do like the idea of letting the young guys play, but I wish that decision would have been made on Labor Day instead of about 1 week left to play.
Also, in past chats you've alluded to the Cardinals' uninspired, flat, lifeless play as them being tired and worn out (and playing with injuries), instead of them just plain as day quitting on LaRussa. If they haven't quit on LaRussa, why would they be so tired?
Sorry, but I like many Cardinals fans are tired and frustrated from watching the local 9 getting manhandled game after game by the bottom dwellers since the middle of August. I want to believe you that they haven't quit, but that's the best way I can describe their play when I watch them.
According to LaRussa, Lopez was released mostly due to the fact he would get very little playing time the rest of the year. Who was behind that decision of playing time he would receive, LaRussa or Mozeliak? Does that also mean we will see less playing time for Pedro Feliz, Aaron Miles, and Randy Winn? Was there any other issues with Lopez besides tardiness? I do like the idea of letting the young guys play, but I wish that decision would have been made on Labor Day instead of about 1 week left to play.
Also, in past chats you've alluded to the Cardinals' uninspired, flat, lifeless play as them being tired and worn out (and playing with injuries), instead of them just plain as day quitting on LaRussa. If they haven't quit on LaRussa, why would they be so tired?
Sorry, but I like many Cardinals fans are tired and frustrated from watching the local 9 getting manhandled game after game by the bottom dwellers since the middle of August. I want to believe you that they haven't quit, but that's the best way I can describe their play when I watch them.
Joe Strauss: Someone needs to
define "quit." Is that splitting a series in Atlanta or winning one
at home against the Padres? This team was bruised by the Ludwick
trade regardless of what organizational spin says. It was damaged
by Freese's season-ending injury and Rasmus' two-week calf injury.
Have some in the clubhouse grown weary of TLR. Absolutely. Flip may
have checked out well before his release. Others are not enthralled
by the lineup variations. To dismiss injuries is wrong. A number
have slogged through the second half, Pujols and Molina among them.
As Mo' suggested earlier this season, there is a clubhouse dynamic
that could be improved. That's an uncomfortable truth for a
manager, especially one as controlling as TLR. The term
"underachieve" never sits well with a manager as well, because most
interpret it as a loaded word suggesting a poorly motivated roster.
It's fair to discuss all these elements. But to say "quit" is a bit
strong.
Do you think the
Cardinals will try and trade Pujols? I think the Cardinal nation is
in a little panic stage right now. I think with a couple more
players next year including David Freese back they should be ok. I
think a legitamate lead off hitter along with a left hander in the
bullpen would be a start.
Joe Strauss: The club may have to
reassess its stance on Freese. Rather than project him as a given,
it may have to view Freese as an option at 3B for next
season.
Quick question and then
I'll hang up to listen to your response.
Big IF here, but if the Cardinals get a deal done with Albert this winter, how quickly do you see it happening (by Thanksgiving?). I would imagine that deal needs to be done quickly to see how the rest of the roster shapes up.
Thanks
Big IF here, but if the Cardinals get a deal done with Albert this winter, how quickly do you see it happening (by Thanksgiving?). I would imagine that deal needs to be done quickly to see how the rest of the roster shapes up.
Thanks
Joe Strauss: I would tend to
agree but I'm not sure the club attaches the same urgency to it. No
one has yet answered the question regarding where Team Pujols
stands on this. What is Albert's motivation to sign any discounted
deal before reaching free agency?
Joe: What's the news of
importance from the Tuesday night team dinner held in Pittsburgh?
Any revelations on LaRussa's future as manager? Any hints on off
season moves by the club? What exactly did they celebrate about
this season? Since Felipe was exiled,was Freese brought in to
participate? Great to see LaRue could be there after seeing the
doctors. Thanks.
Joe Strauss: Commish Hummel is in
Steel Town. I haven't read his account on Cardinal Bet yet. But
apparently the club did save on at least one place-setting.
Joe: I was
listening to fox midwest and Al seemed to say managements focus
would be on Albert this winter therefore he seemed to imply
Westbrook would probably go else where. If this is the case we gave
Luddy away for another "rent a player" much like last years De Rosa
debacle. Can you defend these moves?
Joe Strauss: I am on record as
being baffled by the Ludwick move. It would have made more sense
had the club pulled off another deal behind the Westbrook
acquisition. Again, it's unlikely Westbrook would cut a short-term
deal with the Cardinals before testing free agency.
Surely Albert
does not operate in a vacuum and thus has to be aware on some level
that the uncertainty surrounding his future with the team has
played a role in the Teams' unwillingness or inability to make key
additions to the club. He has to understand that if the team pays
him top dollar ($30M)it directly affects their ability to add
complimentary palyers to support him and amke the team competitive.
I hold no grudge against him for wanting to make the most money and
wanting to win championships. However, it is my belief that these
two goals cannot be accomplished simultaneously in STL due to
payroll limitations. Stringing this out ala the Lebron James fiasco
with Cleveland would certainly affect his legacy in STL. Is Albert
bound to be a Yankee or Red Sox in 2012?
f he wants the most money he can make, he will not be a Cardianl for life as we cannot af
f he wants the most money he can make, he will not be a Cardianl for life as we cannot af
Joe Strauss: I don't know if
Albert wants what would await him in NY or Boston. Should the money
not be right here, the Anaheim Angels seem an interesting
possibility.
Albert with an
extension for Tommy Hanson, Jason Heyward, and a minor leaguer?
These are the thoughts that go through my head as this season
mercifully draws to a close. I've been a Cards fan my whole life
and a die hard one since college where my dorm culture involved a
lot of ESPN and sports watching. Coincidentally my first year of
college began as Albert's first season ended. We loved him on the
second floor of Towers North at SEMO. I still love him but is he
going to sign an extension or are we going to be held hostage by
him? Is ownership going to finally step up the payroll to what it
should be for the revenue that Cards fans provide? You're a brave
man for continuing these chats at a time when apathy has settled
over most of the fanbase and you only have the diehards left.
Thanks for another season of JSL!!!
Joe Strauss: Yours is one of
about 20 trade suggestions regarding Pujols. The Braves operate
within many of the same constraints as the Cardinals. Acquiring a
player of Albert's stature would paint them into a tight financial
corner. There is no way the Braves move Heyward.
Hi Joe. First off, let me
point out that while our beloved Cardinals have rolled over and
died, our favorite chatmeister has been performing at a
championship level all season.
With that (sincere) sucking up out of the way, an observation and a question or two.
Observation: Once again yesterday, we have Mo and Tony not on the same page. This time it's about why Flip left. Mo says, basically, it's his attitude; Tony says lack of playing time available.
This is not a huge deal, but it seems representative to me of a problem that first surfaced last year during the Chris Duncan trade. I see lots and lots of signs that are manager and general manager don't get along as well as we might want.
The question: Can these two guys co-exist?
OK, another question: Has anyone close to Mr. DeWitt noticed this rift? Do they think it matters?
With that (sincere) sucking up out of the way, an observation and a question or two.
Observation: Once again yesterday, we have Mo and Tony not on the same page. This time it's about why Flip left. Mo says, basically, it's his attitude; Tony says lack of playing time available.
This is not a huge deal, but it seems representative to me of a problem that first surfaced last year during the Chris Duncan trade. I see lots and lots of signs that are manager and general manager don't get along as well as we might want.
The question: Can these two guys co-exist?
OK, another question: Has anyone close to Mr. DeWitt noticed this rift? Do they think it matters?
Joe Strauss: TLR is very
protective of clubhouse issues. He at first denied Flip was
scratched due to tardiness issues in Chicago, then addressed it
after it was written. He challenged any notion that Team Rasmus had
issues until after it was written that Raz' had made a trade
request. The front office is squeamish regarding other issues,
particularly the viability of the player development system. The
recent confusion about Jaime Garcia's shutdown did suggest a
communication issue. Mo and TLR have a professional relationship.
Is it on the same level as what TLR enjoyed with Jocko. No. There
is mutual respect. It became clear with last week's front-office
realignment that Mo' is asserting himself more as GM. How that
plays with the manager should become obvious in the next several
weeks.
Joe-
Tyler Greene doesn't exactly seem to be seizing his opportunity. He still looks very tentative at the plate and in the field. I'm really starting to wonder if this former number one pick will ever be a real major league player. I hope that the Cards haven't written his name in ink on next year's roster. He still has a lot to prove, and he needs to come to Spring Training an earn a roster spot, IMO. Thoughts?
Tyler Greene doesn't exactly seem to be seizing his opportunity. He still looks very tentative at the plate and in the field. I'm really starting to wonder if this former number one pick will ever be a real major league player. I hope that the Cards haven't written his name in ink on next year's roster. He still has a lot to prove, and he needs to come to Spring Training an earn a roster spot, IMO. Thoughts?
Joe Strauss: Greene still has a
tendency to play tight at this level. It was obvious in spring
training and remains so. Few doubt his ability to contribute to a
contender. But his problems in the field suggest an inability to
relax and play his game. Moving positions daily is another
complication. And, yes, he will have to earn a spot next
spring.
Do believe
LaRusa puts to much presure on the players that they cannot relax
and play the game. Or do they fed off his intensity. THANKS.
Joe Strauss: It cuts both ways
depending on the player.
Hey Joe,
What is preventing a major overhaul of the Cardinals organization?
1. Confidence in the current product (just a bad year)
2. Fear of change (why mess with 3 million attendance)
3. No vision for alternative (we've always done it this way)
4. None of the above
Thanks for your insight.
What is preventing a major overhaul of the Cardinals organization?
1. Confidence in the current product (just a bad year)
2. Fear of change (why mess with 3 million attendance)
3. No vision for alternative (we've always done it this way)
4. None of the above
Thanks for your insight.
Joe Strauss: Budget and
overrating the player development system. I guess that qualifies as
None of the Above.
this team seems like a
utter and complete mess, so i can believe that they will be able to
address all the holes in the off season. are the cardinals
officially in semi rebuilding mode?
Joe Strauss: The franchise needs
to determine whether Pujols is part of its future or not. There are
huge ramifications to the answer, whatever it is.
Love your
insight, Joe...I have a hard time understanding why Tony (who I
support) keeps playing Feliz,Winn, Miles - all known commodities -
instead of using the young players in every possible
situation...chances are none of those guys are back ! Feliz's at
bats could be used by Green, Descalso, etc. What say you - what is
Tony's rationale for this ?
Another comment - I want LaRussa back. These fan boards dont represent the majority of fans, in my opinion. A lot of these jokers are so beaten down by life,spouses, bosses,etc. that the only say they have in anything is to post negative comments - they somehow feel empowered .
The greatest attribute that Tony has is managing the egos and personalities in a clubhouse for 6 months - that never is talked about - but I feel it is much more important than actual game management decisions, that I question constantly....Comments ?
Another comment - I want LaRussa back. These fan boards dont represent the majority of fans, in my opinion. A lot of these jokers are so beaten down by life,spouses, bosses,etc. that the only say they have in anything is to post negative comments - they somehow feel empowered .
The greatest attribute that Tony has is managing the egos and personalities in a clubhouse for 6 months - that never is talked about - but I feel it is much more important than actual game management decisions, that I question constantly....Comments ?
Joe Strauss: TLR hates to concede
anything, especially a pennant race. It's a fair point to note
TLR's ability to handle a clubhouse. I personally believe he
doesn't have anything against younger players. However, his
expectations may place a burden on a younger talent less adept at
reading his manager's moods. It is also fair to say that the
manager's willingness to publicly absolve some players for actions
that are portrayed as high crimes when committed by others adds to
the confusion. These younger players are hardly in a position to
speak out, though Rasmus has offered a small window with some of
his comments this season.
Hello Joe:
Is there anyway to quantify how much of an impact the Ryan Ludwick trade had on the Cardinal's performance? I realize this is largely subjective, but it seems to me that after the Ludwick trade, the team as a whole lost confidence in themselves and just seemed resigned to getting through the season.
Thanks for your input.
Paul
Is there anyway to quantify how much of an impact the Ryan Ludwick trade had on the Cardinal's performance? I realize this is largely subjective, but it seems to me that after the Ludwick trade, the team as a whole lost confidence in themselves and just seemed resigned to getting through the season.
Thanks for your input.
Paul
Joe Strauss: I'll say this. Even
when in a funk, Ludwick found a way to contribute in RBI
situations. Coincidentally, the Cardinals have struggled badly in
those situations since his departure. (Lud' led the league in
average w/RISP at the time of his trade.) The deal confused a team
that was in first place at the time. When offensive help failed to
arrive, it made it easier to rationalize the club's spastic
production.
Does Waino have a
shot at the Cy Young?
Joe Strauss: It's Roy Halladay's
to lose at this point. Waino' must win 20 to receive strong
consideration. It's unfair, but his team's meltdown is a
negative.
As a St Louis ex pat
living in Washington DC, I don’t get to see the Cardinals win when
they come to lowly Nationals Park because they cannot win on the
road! I understand the Cardinals have made the playoffs 8 times
with losing records on the road, and it is hard to win on the road
in the majors, but the unsettling fact that the Cardinals will once
again have a losing record on the road this season. A stat that
looms almost just as heavy as their inept performances against
teams that are sub 500. Combine the two, and there goes the
Central. How does management/ Tony address this problem, one that
continues to haunt the team wherever it goes and cost us the
division this year?
Joe Strauss: The Cardinals used
to get fat on bad teams. They're getting beat by them this year.
You probably don't remember, but the Cardinals' worst road record
during TLR's tenure came in 2006. Take care of business at home and
within the division. Unfortunately, the Cardinals have appeared
their flattest when playing Houston, Pittsburgh and Chicago this
season. When a team is this poor fundamentally, it is vulnerable
against anyone. This team has been challenged by fundamentals more
than any of the nine TLR clubs I've covered.
Joe, if Tony cannot be
held responsible for this season, when can he be?
He plays head games with Rasmus, Ludwick, and Ryan, but Lopez plays and gives nothing game after game. Now he gets released and Tony still sticks up for him. Why does he love the guys who don't produce like Duncan, Taguchi, Lopez etc. but gives a hard time to guys who have real talent like Ludwick, Rasmus etc.? The media needs to do its job even if it is uncomfortable. This situation is obvious to even a casual fan and makes the so called experts look lame and stupid for not being honest. Tony needs to go, along with a lot of his pets!!
Save "the who could do a better job" . Tony has won 1 world series in 15 years with probably the greatest 1st baseman, 3rd baseman, centerfielder, in the history of the Cardinals. He has had superior talent in a subpar division. Nobody should be overwhelmed by his accomplishments.
He plays head games with Rasmus, Ludwick, and Ryan, but Lopez plays and gives nothing game after game. Now he gets released and Tony still sticks up for him. Why does he love the guys who don't produce like Duncan, Taguchi, Lopez etc. but gives a hard time to guys who have real talent like Ludwick, Rasmus etc.? The media needs to do its job even if it is uncomfortable. This situation is obvious to even a casual fan and makes the so called experts look lame and stupid for not being honest. Tony needs to go, along with a lot of his pets!!
Save "the who could do a better job" . Tony has won 1 world series in 15 years with probably the greatest 1st baseman, 3rd baseman, centerfielder, in the history of the Cardinals. He has had superior talent in a subpar division. Nobody should be overwhelmed by his accomplishments.
Joe Strauss: Your opinion is
noted. I wonder how you would define success.
Joe,
Lopez is being branded as the cancer in the clubhouse. If that's true, why would Pujols and others not not have internally corrected the problem long before now? I just think the cancer is larger than is apparent on the surface. This team has no chemistry and that makes no sense with people like Waino, Carp, Pujols and Molina driving the bus.
I'm no Schu fan but it seemed that he and Ryan played most of the year like insecure high schoolers on a college team. That didn't exist last year that I could see. Something stinks!
What is your take?
Lopez is being branded as the cancer in the clubhouse. If that's true, why would Pujols and others not not have internally corrected the problem long before now? I just think the cancer is larger than is apparent on the surface. This team has no chemistry and that makes no sense with people like Waino, Carp, Pujols and Molina driving the bus.
I'm no Schu fan but it seemed that he and Ryan played most of the year like insecure high schoolers on a college team. That didn't exist last year that I could see. Something stinks!
What is your take?
Joe Strauss: Lopez moved lockers
in mid-season, away from Pujols into a closeted corner of the
clubhouse. Lopez explained the move as a desire for more "space."
However, his interactions with Pujols became noticeably less
frequent. As Mo' said Tuesday, reasons for his release were not
confined to the two chronicled instances of his tardiness.
Regarding chemistry, the Cardinals' appeared their most comfortable
following last June's acquisition of Mark DeRosa. He had a knack of
involving everyone in hijinx, whether it be good-natured ribbing or
impromptu football games in the clubhouse. This team has often
appeared to be walking on eggshells, if not glass.
Yadi has
caught almost 100 more innings than any other catcher in baseball
this year. Between his reported knee issues and the LaRue
situation, how much confidence is the club willing to put in
Pagnozzi or Anderson to be an adequate back up next year?
Joe Strauss: Not enough that
either Pagnozzi or Anderson would significantly reduce Molina's
innings load. I believe backup catcher one of this team's
underrated needs. The continued wear on Molina may put him at risk
following his current contract, which expires after 2012.
Why is the stock of Matt
Pagnozzi so much higher than Bryan Anderson? It appears that
Anderson is a much better hitter. I have also heard that Mike
Matheny is a fan of Anderson. Thanks for your input.
Joe Strauss: The club rates
Pagnozzi a superior receiver and handler of pitchers.
Is the departure of
Lopez an excuse to point to one guy and say ,"he was the problem
the entire time?" or are there larger problems with the chemistry
of the team?
Joe Strauss: Lopez is/was not the
only issue.
Thank you for
taking my questions. I'll be concise because I know you are a busy
man, and that Mike Smith can be a tough editor:
Given the number of managerial openings, do you believe La Russa will give, or the Cardinals will push, for an early answer on his future?
And if he decides to leave ... I notice with interest that Joe Torre leaves the door slightly ajar on managing again. Remembering the standing ovation he was given here when the Cardinals observed his birthday and his longstanding affection for St. Louis, do you believe there's potential for a match?
Given the number of managerial openings, do you believe La Russa will give, or the Cardinals will push, for an early answer on his future?
And if he decides to leave ... I notice with interest that Joe Torre leaves the door slightly ajar on managing again. Remembering the standing ovation he was given here when the Cardinals observed his birthday and his longstanding affection for St. Louis, do you believe there's potential for a match?
Joe Strauss: Mo' has publicly
stated his desire for a rapid resolution to the manager's future.
If TLR were to leave, Torre's name would be mentioned. Remember,
the brewery ordered Torre's firing in 1995 before selling to the
current group. Torre is also 70, meaning if he takes another job it
will be a short-term assignment. He would also want to import his
own people. As noted before, few fully appreciate the potential
turnover when La Russa departs.
Joe,
Judging by the solid numbers that Lance Lynn put up in his first year in Memphis, is it a possibility that he may be the next in line to get a crack at a spot in the rotation next season, or will he follow in the footsteps of McClellan, Hawksworth, etc, and possibly start off in mid relief? Just having another starter that could put up a decent season without paying a fortune for them, and allocating that money towards a different position player would make a huge impact, or so it would seem to me.
Thanks!
Judging by the solid numbers that Lance Lynn put up in his first year in Memphis, is it a possibility that he may be the next in line to get a crack at a spot in the rotation next season, or will he follow in the footsteps of McClellan, Hawksworth, etc, and possibly start off in mid relief? Just having another starter that could put up a decent season without paying a fortune for them, and allocating that money towards a different position player would make a huge impact, or so it would seem to me.
Thanks!
Joe Strauss: Lynn has pitched his
way into the picture. McClellan has waited three years for a
chance. If the organization decides to fill from within, KMac wins
all ties.
Joe-These chats
are great. Guess I'm riding the Rockies bandwagon at this point of
the season. Most glaring needs for the Cards next season?
Mine-
2nd base
3rd base (do not think we can count on Freese's ankles)
Solid back-up catcher
5th starter (Westbrooke?)
Also, if Tony is not back, who else besides Jose O. to manage? Sandberg, Simmons, Torre?
Thanks
2nd base
3rd base (do not think we can count on Freese's ankles)
Solid back-up catcher
5th starter (Westbrooke?)
Also, if Tony is not back, who else besides Jose O. to manage? Sandberg, Simmons, Torre?
Thanks
Joe Strauss: There's a big
question to be answered regarding RF. Next week I'll present a
handful of managerial options. Oquendo, Simmons, Torre and T.
Pendleton will appear on it.
why are cardinals
so deicated to their manager?when other teams lose and they are
supposed to win they fire their manager.this will be a 500 season
subpar and underachieving or not they didn't respond to tony.time
for new era of manager in st louis thx
Joe Strauss: I must have missed
the announcement when the Braves fired Bobby Cox or the Anaheim
Angels dismissed Mike Scioscia. Perhaps some attention might be
paid to how the Cardinals construct their team now relative to 5-6
years ago.
Is there any chance
that La Russa will hit the road? As a fan since 1949,
to say that I am dissapointed is the understatement. I believe that 40 percent of the losses were manager losses and not the players.
to say that I am dissapointed is the understatement. I believe that 40 percent of the losses were manager losses and not the players.
Joe Strauss: You have got to be
kidding. Unfortunately, Eddie Dyer is no longer available.
Chatmeister
I know your don't suffer sarcasm or rhetorical questions from us tsunamists, so I won't go there. But why can't the cards hire a GM who signs a player who puts up numbers like these: 4th in the NL in hitting, 5th in RBI, 4th in hits, 4th in total bases, 6th in slugging, 5th in OPS and tied for 7th in all of baseball in doubles.
On the other hand, maybe the naysayers in Cardinal Nation should give Johnny Mo some credit for signing Matt Holliday !
thanks
John
I know your don't suffer sarcasm or rhetorical questions from us tsunamists, so I won't go there. But why can't the cards hire a GM who signs a player who puts up numbers like these: 4th in the NL in hitting, 5th in RBI, 4th in hits, 4th in total bases, 6th in slugging, 5th in OPS and tied for 7th in all of baseball in doubles.
On the other hand, maybe the naysayers in Cardinal Nation should give Johnny Mo some credit for signing Matt Holliday !
thanks
John
Joe Strauss: So noted. The
Holliday acquisition and re-signing arguably represents the high
point of Mo's term. Funny, haven't read much criticism of
Holliday's desire/production lately.
I'm assuming so, but do
the Cardinals pay Felipe's salary for the entire year if he was
released?
Joe Strauss: Yes.
So Joe,
If you have the choice to roll Penny's money into a contract for either Westbook or Uggla who would you choose? (Personally I'd prefer Uggla)
If you have the choice to roll Penny's money into a contract for either Westbook or Uggla who would you choose? (Personally I'd prefer Uggla)
Joe Strauss: This team's big move
this winter needs to focus on offense.
Long-time reader,
first-time poster. Now that we have a body of work to evaluate,
what common tactics, if any, has Walt Jocketty used to build
winners in both St. Louis and Cincinnati? And have the current
powers-that-be in St. Louis abandoned any of these tactics?
Joe Strauss: Jocko struck gold in
acquiring Scott Rolen. Some of his other ex-Cardinal hires (Izzy,
Springer, Edmonds) have experienced mixed results. Miguel Cairo was
very good for most of this year. Jocketty benefited from a
minor-league system that has proved productive lately. Predecessor
Wayne Krivsky deserves some credit here. Jocketty also imported
much of his former front office from St. Louis. People like Jerry
Walker, Cam Bonifay and Mike Squires are very good. Mo' will be
hiring two special assistants in upcoming weeks. Those are
important moves. Right or wrong, Jocko doesn't have much use for
the sabermetrics crowd.
I was just
wondering if any one else thinks our hitting coach is doing very
good this year. There hitting is real bad, it has been all year.
Why don't people think he is to blame? Just wondering what you
think.
Joe Strauss: Statistically, the
Cardinals are comparable to last season. However, the whole does
not equal the sum of its parts. Much can be said for the team's
record, of course. It's very difficult to evaluate a hitting coach.
TLR has said as much. However, there should probably be cause for
some concern when the same issues noted in April and May remain in
September -- namely, the lack of adjustments made and the heavy
reliance on video. McGwire is an advocate of the top-hand-off
approach, a move popularized by Charlie Lau and championed by TLR.
It doesn't work for everybody, as we've seen this year.
Last year, as the
division was clinched and the playoffs were a lock for the Birds,
they had a monumental collapse that carried into the
post-season.
Do you think it's any coincidence that they've been terrible at the end of both of the last two seasons? I am never one to jump on TLR, but his attitude does collapse at the end of seasons lately.
Are the two possibly connected? If not, what would you point to as a reason for this result two years in a row?
Do you think it's any coincidence that they've been terrible at the end of both of the last two seasons? I am never one to jump on TLR, but his attitude does collapse at the end of seasons lately.
Are the two possibly connected? If not, what would you point to as a reason for this result two years in a row?
Joe Strauss: Coincidentally,
Pujols was less effective in September the last two years. He
required elbow surgery last October and is nursing a sore left
elbow this year. As stated before, this team frequently appears
worn down. TLR loves a team's "relentless" nature. However, this
has rarely seemed an easy season. The frequently lineup and role
changes have proved unsettling to some. The middle defense, except
for catcher, has been uneven all season. Coincidenally, the middle
defense includes three players whose status has risen and fallen
several times in 2010. This team needed help within its rotation
and its lineup. It helped the rotation by subtracting from the
lineup. Obviously, it hasn't worked.
Hey Joe,
The stst on the postgame last night blew me away. When Cards score 3 or less, their record is 7-54 and 4 or more 70-19. That blew me away. Pass along to the front office that we need a minimum of two big bats in the lineup next year to fill the four feeble holes at 3B,SS,2B, and RF. Thanks for letting us vent throughout the year.
The stst on the postgame last night blew me away. When Cards score 3 or less, their record is 7-54 and 4 or more 70-19. That blew me away. Pass along to the front office that we need a minimum of two big bats in the lineup next year to fill the four feeble holes at 3B,SS,2B, and RF. Thanks for letting us vent throughout the year.
Joe Strauss: It's very revealing.
The pitching hasn't been the problem this season. That stat would
also suggest that the proper two additions (plus added depth) could
make this team very good again very quickly. Finding the proper two
additions is easier said than done, and comes at a cost.
Hey Joe,
It's hard to go back and think of, "what if." But what if Brad Penny and Kyle Lohse had not gone down on back to back days? What if David Freese had been able to play 140 games this year? As constructed out of spring training the Cardinals were thought to be the favorites in the division, though lacking depth. Considering the Red's what ifs (what if Scott Rolen has a rebound season, what if Votto plays like an MVP?), was Card's management overly optimistic, or did they have a realistic perspective on the post season chances of this club? In other words, were the Reds really odds on favorites to win the division but we just didn't know it? Thanks for your response.
It's hard to go back and think of, "what if." But what if Brad Penny and Kyle Lohse had not gone down on back to back days? What if David Freese had been able to play 140 games this year? As constructed out of spring training the Cardinals were thought to be the favorites in the division, though lacking depth. Considering the Red's what ifs (what if Scott Rolen has a rebound season, what if Votto plays like an MVP?), was Card's management overly optimistic, or did they have a realistic perspective on the post season chances of this club? In other words, were the Reds really odds on favorites to win the division but we just didn't know it? Thanks for your response.
Joe Strauss: If the team stays
whole, it wins the division. However, few teams avoid injuries over
an entire schedule. The Cardinals built a team to win a mediocre
division. The Reds refused to play along.
I think the
cancellation of the Cardinals fall instructional camp is another
sign that ownership will be unwilling to increase payroll
enough
to sign Pujois and still allow enough payroll for other players as they become eligible for arbitration and free agency. I am also
concerned about the number of key players who probably are entering the
downside of their careers--certainly Carpenter and Franklin but perhaps even Pujois and Wainwright.
to sign Pujois and still allow enough payroll for other players as they become eligible for arbitration and free agency. I am also
concerned about the number of key players who probably are entering the
downside of their careers--certainly Carpenter and Franklin but perhaps even Pujois and Wainwright.
Joe Strauss: There are logistical
complications to maintaining an instructional league presence. Some
within the industry have noted, however, the contradiction between
a team that has thrown in with player development and its
elimination of "instructs" the last two years. One wonders if an
arrangement might be had with a team on the Gulf Coast to share a
facility. I don't make a connection between this decision and
Pujols' future.
Which
current Cardinals are not under contract for next year?
Joe Strauss: Miles, Penny, Winn,
LaRue, D. Reyes, Westbrook, Feliz and Suppan are pending free
agents. Trever Miller's option is vested, so he is assured of being
here in 2011.
Carpenter's contract
ends after next year. He's getting older. He'll likely lose more of
his "stuff" in the upcoming years. What do you do with him after
2011?
Joe Strauss: It doesn't matter
what I'd do with him. Should the club re-sign Pujols, it's hard to
imagine them allocating similar money to what Carpenter current
makes to retain the '05 Cy Young Award winner. Carpenter has been
remarkably productive this season despite dealing with a series of
mechanical issues. He remains one of the league's Top 10, maybe Top
6 starters.
Wave Master,
A few weeks ago, you stated that "individuals in uniform" were refering to Rasmus as Luhnow's baby. One, were those uniformed members of the management team or uniformed players? Second, how does that discord comport with your reference today that more than just Flip was out of step with the TLR parade? We know you know. The question is will you deal?
A few weeks ago, you stated that "individuals in uniform" were refering to Rasmus as Luhnow's baby. One, were those uniformed members of the management team or uniformed players? Second, how does that discord comport with your reference today that more than just Flip was out of step with the TLR parade? We know you know. The question is will you deal?
Joe Strauss: Not for free. In
some instances you get everything I know. In this one, for now, you
get some of what I know. Sorry.
as a esteemed
baseball expert, in your honest opinion does it really make sense
for the cardinals to sign pujols to a long term deal when they have
so many needs? just playing devils advocate and would like your
opinion based on the business side.
Thanks,
anonymous person that has since gone into hiding.
Thanks,
anonymous person that has since gone into hiding.
Joe Strauss: That's a third-rail
question for the franchise. The club is in a no-win in some
respects. Sign Albert and you're payroll flexibility is sapped. Let
him walk or trade him and you risk a tremendous PR backlash. This
is a club terrified of its players speaking in anything beyond
cliches. Uncomfortable truths are to be cleared from the table.
It's one reason why the media blackout regarding Albert's situation
has worked well for the club, regardless of its customers' desire
to know.
Just remember Sept. 5. The manager confirms a P-D report of Rasmus' two-month-old trade request and the player is taken into a room for some post-game "re-education." The player emerges denying the request. Laughable. It shows a lack of respect for the media, to be sure. It also plays its fan base for chumps.
Just remember Sept. 5. The manager confirms a P-D report of Rasmus' two-month-old trade request and the player is taken into a room for some post-game "re-education." The player emerges denying the request. Laughable. It shows a lack of respect for the media, to be sure. It also plays its fan base for chumps.
Hey Joe, hope you're
ready to put on your Maury Chass hat as business issues become the
offseason topic du jour for these Cardinals. Speaking of which...if
Pujols is re-signed, what do you think it's going to take in terms
of total ML player payroll to field a reasonable supporting cast?
And can DeWitt & Co make money (or at least not go belly up
because we'd hate to see that) at whatever level it will take? One
thing the owners have in their pocket is the price increase they
will be able to impose for the first time on ballpark founders who
paid their seat license in lump sum back in '04. I think we're all
bracing for the Pujols tax.
Also, I noticed in a tweet of several days ago you were calling some broadcast media poachers "chipmunks" but according to D. Halberstam in his excellent book October 1964, that name was taken years ago by Jimmy Cannon who used it to describe the new breed of sports reporters (eg. Maury Allen, Stan Isaacs) back in the early '60's. So you'll have to find a different more derogatory nickname for the poachers. I kind of like poachers. Thanks.
Also, I noticed in a tweet of several days ago you were calling some broadcast media poachers "chipmunks" but according to D. Halberstam in his excellent book October 1964, that name was taken years ago by Jimmy Cannon who used it to describe the new breed of sports reporters (eg. Maury Allen, Stan Isaacs) back in the early '60's. So you'll have to find a different more derogatory nickname for the poachers. I kind of like poachers. Thanks.
Joe Strauss: I've stated numerous
times that a $110 million payroll is an eventuality if Pujols
stays. And your point is well taken about the lapsed price freeze
on Founders' tickets. Renewal rates are to be watched....
Whatever term you prefer, poaching has become more prevalent in STL media than on a Kenyan game preserve. These are many of the same outlets that rely on regular spoon feedings by the major league franchises in town. Several years ago I was actually asked on-air one night by local talent "do we really need to know" if McGwire used PED's? No, we just need to keep the rightsholder's "partner" happy. CandyLand.
Whatever term you prefer, poaching has become more prevalent in STL media than on a Kenyan game preserve. These are many of the same outlets that rely on regular spoon feedings by the major league franchises in town. Several years ago I was actually asked on-air one night by local talent "do we really need to know" if McGwire used PED's? No, we just need to keep the rightsholder's "partner" happy. CandyLand.
Interesting
developments with the Cardinals. I'm sure you are watching with the
same amazement that many of us are. Being objective, it may be
easier than for us avid fans, but it is sad to watch.
But I for one do not believe money is going to be poured or even trickled into this team by Mr. DeWitt. So should we as fans be hopeful for some grand changes over the winter, or faced with looking at more of the same in 2011?
Looks like the season assessment meetings are beginning early. And thanks for your expert insight into the Cardinals game this season. You are a must read for fans.
Thom
But I for one do not believe money is going to be poured or even trickled into this team by Mr. DeWitt. So should we as fans be hopeful for some grand changes over the winter, or faced with looking at more of the same in 2011?
Looks like the season assessment meetings are beginning early. And thanks for your expert insight into the Cardinals game this season. You are a must read for fans.
Thom
Joe Strauss: It's up to the fans.
They an choose to roll over for a tepid product or demand more. The
flaws within this team were obvious in March and became fatal by
late August. I would expect substantive change this winter. Right
now the club bases budget on 3.2 million attendance. That an
amazing commodity. Teams in bigger markets such as Atlanta and
Houston would kill for that leverage. Thank you for your kind
words.
Hey Joe,
I asked Gordo this earlier in the week...rather than naming specific players one would like the Cardinals to trade for or sign (Jacoby Ellsbury, Orlando Hudson...oops), what type of player do you think the front office will look to get in the off season. Meaning, position they play, power hitter, base stealing threat, etc.
Thanks,
Max
I asked Gordo this earlier in the week...rather than naming specific players one would like the Cardinals to trade for or sign (Jacoby Ellsbury, Orlando Hudson...oops), what type of player do you think the front office will look to get in the off season. Meaning, position they play, power hitter, base stealing threat, etc.
Thanks,
Max
Joe Strauss: Just for that you've
received the JSL!!! death penalty. If you're asking Tipsheet, there
is obviously a lack of institutional control.
Do you think there is
a chance they re-consider putting Holliday in RF next year and
bringing in a heavier bat for left?
Joe Strauss: I believe if
Holliday is willing it has to be on the table.
Joe, when used as a
utility player earlier in the year, Felipe Lopez performed quite
well. At the start of this year, nobody in Cardinal management
believed that Felipe Lopez would be the regular third baseman. Yet,
because of injuries and poor planning within the Cardianal front
office, Lopez was thrust into that role. It is hardly surprising
that Lopez became exposed when made an everyday regular at an
unnatural position.
Beyond all this, even were Felipe Lopez to hit .300 and play perfect 3rd base, the Cardinals would probably still have finished second this year. Seems to me that Cardinal management had a meeting and decided to make Lopez the villian for an extremely disappointing season. My thought is there are other, more deserving, scapegoats. Jeff Luhnow, and William DeWitt Jr. come to mind. Your thoughts.
Beyond all this, even were Felipe Lopez to hit .300 and play perfect 3rd base, the Cardinals would probably still have finished second this year. Seems to me that Cardinal management had a meeting and decided to make Lopez the villian for an extremely disappointing season. My thought is there are other, more deserving, scapegoats. Jeff Luhnow, and William DeWitt Jr. come to mind. Your thoughts.
Joe Strauss: The whole villain
talk is a little over the top. No one is saying Flip is the sole
reason for the season's failure. My take is that Tuesday's action
addressed a single player, not an epidemic.
One of your colleagues
recently suggested that LaRussa has earned the right to return next
season, a notion I strongly reject based on the last four seasons,
if not this season alone. Nevertheless, it appears increasingly
likely that our present manager will be returning. Do you believe
that he will be capable of making ANY changes to his approach that
could lead this team to a different outcome, and if so, what
changes? Basically, I am asking you to tell me why I should bother
watching next season when the same problems (manager, hitting
coach, young players the manager doesn't like) will be present in
2011.
Joe Strauss: I get the sense that
the front office will impress several points before announcing
TLR's return. If nothing else, an attempt will be made to offer a
more unified front on organizational direction. I don't know if Mo'
is prone to make a move on the coaching staff. However,
philsophical questions are fair game, from my understanding.
If Carl Crawford makes
it to free agency, any chance that the Cardinals will make a run
for him (pending Pujols's situation, of course)?
Joe Strauss: Crawford in LF, Raz'
in CF and Holliday in RF strikes me as compelling. I find it hard
to believe the club can manipulate resources to make that happen if
Pujols is extended. In this instance it would be fun to be
wrong.
Don't you think the
season should be over before everyone gets wrapped up in the
discussion as to is going to win the MVP, Cy Young, Rookie of the
Year,etc. I think Wainwright's admission of this week he may have
been pushing for the Cy award recently and broke his concentration.
Pujols does not deserve the MVP, Garcia has no chance for the
Rookie and with this last month Adam may have eliminated himself
from the Cy. All of this can be very distracting to trying to win a
game here and there. What do you think?
Joe Strauss: I don't agree with
your cause and affect. Albert is playing hurt. The Cardinals
determined Garcia was pitching fatigued. For most of the last four
weeks Wainwright has been pitching with indifferent support.
Looking at today's
lineup, TLR has it stacked with lefties with Descalso at 3rd.
However, Pagnozzi again gets the start over Anderson at catcher
with Yadi getting a break. Is it safe to assume at this point that
Anderson's earlier recalls over Pagnozzi was Mo's call over TLR's
preference? Also, safe to assume Anderson will not be the backup
next year so long as TLR is managing? There is nothing to be gained
at this point in the year by playing Pagnozzi. You know what you
have with him. Thanks.
Joe Strauss: I've written for two
years that Anderson does not receive strong support due to his
pitch-calling and mechanics behind the plate. Many have twisted
that into a personal attack. I'm answering the question. The
Cardinals apparently believe they know what they have with Anderson
as well. Anderson's value peaked two or three years ago. The front
office held firm that he would eventually become a part of the
major-league club. Perhaps he will. But the manager is offering his
opinion via the lineup card.
My friends and I
believe if this meltdown continues and the Cards fall to 3rd place
(or .500 or God forbid, under) then Ownership will have no choice
but to tell TLR goodbye and good luck. Your thoughts?
Joe Strauss: And I'm the
cynic?
Chatmeister, Skip has
been physically compromised this year? That's the first I've heard
of that. I'm a huge fan of his (I'm the one person in the stands
wearing a Schumaker jersey) so I'm hoping to see him have greater
success in the future. What injuries has he been playing
through?
Joe Strauss: Schumaker suffered
significant trauma to his left wrist and forearm in July. It is not
known whether he will require postseason surgery. He has also dealt
with a leg issue.
Hey Joe,
the Brian fellow, I'm sure meant "We've only won one World Series" (with Pujols) No need to be a !@^*&^ about it. Unless you were belittling the man to mean "be greatful you have won one world series. If that's the case, having 2 co aces, the MV3, the games 1a or 1b best player, and other commodoties, yes I believe there should have been another world series in there and agree with Brian's "only won one World Series" statement.
the Brian fellow, I'm sure meant "We've only won one World Series" (with Pujols) No need to be a !@^*&^ about it. Unless you were belittling the man to mean "be greatful you have won one world series. If that's the case, having 2 co aces, the MV3, the games 1a or 1b best player, and other commodoties, yes I believe there should have been another world series in there and agree with Brian's "only won one World Series" statement.
Joe Strauss: I don't believe the
Cardinals were the game's best team in 2006. Perhaps we disagree. I
believe they were the best team in 2004 but flamed out against
Boston after a grind through the NLCS. They overachieved to reach
100 wins in '05. On balance, one championship seems about
right.
Joe,
The Cardinals have to be one of the most pathetically underachieving teams in years, if not decades! A pure superstar in Pujols, two Cy Young candidate pitchers in Waino and Carp, another star in Holliday and a record of less than .500 since mid May! How does this team rank in your career of covering professional baseball teams?
The Cardinals have to be one of the most pathetically underachieving teams in years, if not decades! A pure superstar in Pujols, two Cy Young candidate pitchers in Waino and Carp, another star in Holliday and a record of less than .500 since mid May! How does this team rank in your career of covering professional baseball teams?
Joe Strauss: This team and the
'98 Baltimore Orioles are the most baffling I've covered.
Hi Joe... Really enjoy
your take on all things Cardinal...
I recall Pujols saying something to the effect that he wanted to play on a competitive team. Yet it seems to me that his currently unsigned status is damaging the team, perhaps in the dugout, and certainly in the front office. The unpopular Ludwick deal seemed to come directly from payroll issues caused in part by awaiting the big blow that will be Pujols new contract.
How do you think it will affect next year's club if he does, or does NOT, resign this winter?
I recall Pujols saying something to the effect that he wanted to play on a competitive team. Yet it seems to me that his currently unsigned status is damaging the team, perhaps in the dugout, and certainly in the front office. The unpopular Ludwick deal seemed to come directly from payroll issues caused in part by awaiting the big blow that will be Pujols new contract.
How do you think it will affect next year's club if he does, or does NOT, resign this winter?
Joe Strauss: I believe you may
see much of the same paralysis if no direction is determined.
Publicly, the club challenges this notion.
Can we assume the same
"counsel" you site for Rasmus has counseled Holliday in private
workouts to reduce the leg kick? Or are you not here to talk about
the past?
Joe Strauss: Not the same person.
But you may be on to something.
Sir
Tsunami--I have learned a great deal about the nuance of this fine
game by reading your weekly chats over the course of this
unravelling season. In retrospect, I see the beginning of the end
as late July--a couple of extra inning home games in brutal heat,
followed by perhaps the most listless performance in recent memory
in a brutal weekend series in my my neighborhood. That's the
weekend Raz asked for a trade, and all the beer in Wrigley couldn't
buy a defensive double play. Out of gas with a third of the season
left. . .You squared up the depth issue in spring training, a much
better assessment than the front office. After resolving the Pujols
elephant, what are the next three or four priorities for next
year?
Joe Strauss: Finding a upgraded
offensive presence, whether at 3B, 2B or SS. Determining whether
Franklin is next year's closer. Fortifying depth issues while
acknowledging that most of the answers lie outside the
organization. The club also needs to acquire a fallback for the
rotation if McClellan is not the answer as No. 5 starter. The
fallback needs to be more than a Rich Hill type.
WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS
TRADE BOGGS FOR DESMOND SS FROM WASHINGTON NATS
Joe Strauss: Don't think the Nats
would do it. But it's an interesting thought. Desmond also has
serious defensive deficiencies that may warrant a position switch.
He's made 33 errors and would likely cause Dave Duncan to erupt
within the season's first two weeks.
Joe,
Do you see the club stalling on the Pujols negotiations until most of the other FA's have signed this winter only to use that as an excuse for fielding an inferior product in 2011 or is that too negative a question to pose?
Thanks,
Kevin
Do you see the club stalling on the Pujols negotiations until most of the other FA's have signed this winter only to use that as an excuse for fielding an inferior product in 2011 or is that too negative a question to pose?
Thanks,
Kevin
Joe Strauss: Not at all. But
probably too speculative to answer.
You mentioned earlier
that some Cy Young voters think wins are lucky, and then you also
mentioned that the team's meltdown will hamper Wainwright's shot at
the Cy as well. If wins are not considered important, shouldn't
losses and overall team performance not be considered important as
well? Or is this just the thought of a small but apparently vocal
and contentious group of voters?
If wins aren't considered important, how is it rationable that Wainwright more than likely would've won last year had McClellan not blown his 20th win, but because that happened and Wainwright only had 19 wins he got 3rd place?
If wins aren't considered important, how is it rationable that Wainwright more than likely would've won last year had McClellan not blown his 20th win, but because that happened and Wainwright only had 19 wins he got 3rd place?
Joe Strauss: Roy Halladay didn't
pitch in the NL last season. As for Waino' in 2009, the weight of a
20th win is enormous, whether the spreadsheet guys admit it or not.
Especially when you lead the league in innings and have one of the
league's best ERA's.
I need to replenish
my bank account after a three team parlay that included Baylor and
Hawaii.....Can you make it up to me with some quality picks for
this weekend?
Joe Strauss: Check Twitter
tomorrow. The Hawaii loss was ridiculous, as you know.
YES WE ARE ALL SERIOUS
WHEN WE ASK OR STATE THERE HAS BEEN ONLY 1 WORLD SERIES WIN UNDER
tlr. WHEN IS ANYONE IN THE CARDIANL SPORTS MEDIA GOING TO STOP
BEING MANAGEMENT MYRMIDONS AND LOOK AT THE TEAM SITUATIONS WITH
OPEN EYES?!?!
Joe Strauss: I don't know, but
I'm going to have to phone Oxford attendee Junior Goold to find out
what a Myrmidon is.
Well, being called
one of the ant people by a ChatHead is going to end this one for
me. I've enjoyed the discourse and the venting. We'll be back next
for the final regular season segment of Joe Strauss Live!!!, the
gift that keeps on giving. Enjoyed it as always. As noted earlier,
this week's college football investments will be found @JoeStrauss
on Twitter later this week. Enjoy.
