Unreal.
The Tsunami checks out Kyle Lohse in Memphis and returns to a
Banzai Pipeline of fan angst. Let's see: The team plays fast and
loose while dropping a series in Chicago, which followed an
11-inning one-hit loss to the Phillies. 'Waino' was definitely not
bueno in New York last night, frustrating Junior Goold's desire to
again reprise The Pitch against Carlos Beltran from the 2006 NLCS
-- Beltran struck out, I think, on a curve or something. And now
the Cardinals apparently are "out of it" in the Oswalt sweepstakes
according to an organizational mole. Yes, this is the kind of week
that feeds the Big Wave. Sharks in the water, boogy boarders out!!!
Let's dive in for some open-ended full contact chat!!!
Mr.
Strauss,
We,ve been on vacation, but I caught scores daily. First game i could watch was Sunday. i saw Pujols lead off an inning. They threw him strikes and he homered. Does anyboyd ever think Albert expanded his zone because he hits so often with two outs and no runners that opponents don't have to pitch to him? Is it Pujols or La Russa who refuses to understand that he would see more hittable pitches if he hit fourth?
Secondly, i noticed that Ludwick was back. In 2008, he hit 37 homers and drove in more than 100. Naturally, he hit second, so we could be certain he would not be troubled by any pesky baserunners.
Finally, we tied the game and had a chance with the go ahead run on second. Molina was hitting seventh. Since, we are pretty much the only fools to bat the pitcher eighth in a century and a quarter of baseball, they just walk Molina. Can anyone explain to La Russa that the number seven hitter will never have a chance to drive in big runs so long as the pitcher hits eighth? Does he really think there is value in having key at bats handed to Ryan instead of to Molina?
We,ve been on vacation, but I caught scores daily. First game i could watch was Sunday. i saw Pujols lead off an inning. They threw him strikes and he homered. Does anyboyd ever think Albert expanded his zone because he hits so often with two outs and no runners that opponents don't have to pitch to him? Is it Pujols or La Russa who refuses to understand that he would see more hittable pitches if he hit fourth?
Secondly, i noticed that Ludwick was back. In 2008, he hit 37 homers and drove in more than 100. Naturally, he hit second, so we could be certain he would not be troubled by any pesky baserunners.
Finally, we tied the game and had a chance with the go ahead run on second. Molina was hitting seventh. Since, we are pretty much the only fools to bat the pitcher eighth in a century and a quarter of baseball, they just walk Molina. Can anyone explain to La Russa that the number seven hitter will never have a chance to drive in big runs so long as the pitcher hits eighth? Does he really think there is value in having key at bats handed to Ryan instead of to Molina?
Joe Strauss: Hear you
loud and clear, 'Ol Diz'. But I missed your message last Wednesday
when the Cardinals were in the midst of an 8-game win streak and
all appeared right with the world. Look, I'm not a honk for the
pitching hitting eighth. I think it's more a distraction than
anything, and a pretty dependable barometer for when TLR doesn't
like his lineup. (I remind the ChatHeads that the Cardinals have
missed the playoffs or fired the hitting coach every season in
which TLR has retreated to the alignment.) I'm with you on Lud'; I
see him as a No. 5 hitter, or No. 6 if you want to slide a
hot-hitting LH bat in the No. 5 spot. Unfortunately, the Cardinals
don't have an excess of scalding bats right now. Somebody has to
get on base IN FRONT of Pujols. (Jon Jay looks good there.) Thanks
for the throwing out the first, uh, complaint.
Is it
common, or even considered, that a pitcher would request a middle
infielder(s) to play behind him, as might happen with a particular
catcher?
Joe Strauss: Yes, it is.
Note how often Brendan Ryan starts behind Chris Carpenter.
Coincidence?
The signing of
Matt Holiday is Mo's way and Cardinal ownership's way of preparing
to move forward and remain competive in the post Albert days that
await the Redbird Nation. That is why Mo paided more than market
for Matt and why the Cardinals will hang onto their young offensive
talent and kept their 2010 season spending in check. Why won't you
begin to let the Cardinal faithful slowly go thru the withdrawl
process rather than go "cold turkey"? In other words give us a
wake-up, smell the coffee,grow-up, and get over yourself
speech?
Joe Strauss: Every week
I'm asked the odds of El Hombre remaining in STL beyond 2011. The
odds have gradually shifted from 70/30 in favor to 60/40 and most
recently to 50/50. This book doesn't come with pictures, sir. Pay
attention.
Big Kahuna, I haven't heard anything about Pinto or the other
reliever whose name escapes me, that the cards picked up recently.
Are they making any progress at Memphis? At one time I think they
were both highly regarded. Thanks Joe
Joe Strauss: Mike
MacDougal, whom the Cardinals signed as a free agent July 7, worked
in relief Monday in Memphis. He looked very impressive and threw
very "firm". (A little scout-speak for you the ChatHeads.) I don't
see any LH relief help in the system; hence, the Cardinals are
searching for outside options.
Joe,
I'm having a difficult time understanding why the Cards aren't pursuing Austin Wilson, and doing everything that they can do to land this kid. Sure, he has a commitment to Stanford, but it seems as if that isn't the sure thing like it once was. For the same front office that traded for Khalil Greene, how can you not go all out for this kid, who if signed, would immediately land in the top three of our prospects?
Thanks!
I'm having a difficult time understanding why the Cards aren't pursuing Austin Wilson, and doing everything that they can do to land this kid. Sure, he has a commitment to Stanford, but it seems as if that isn't the sure thing like it once was. For the same front office that traded for Khalil Greene, how can you not go all out for this kid, who if signed, would immediately land in the top three of our prospects?
Thanks!
Joe Strauss: They are
pursuing him. One might ask why there hasn't been more progress
with first-round pick Zach Cox. A possible explanation is that
Wilson is the higher-ceiling player. The Cardinals may want to
commit as many resources as possible to changing Wilson's mind from
attending Stanford. If successful, it's a very legitimate question
how hard they would continue to push for Cox. V-P scouting/player
development Jeff Luhnow says it's possible the club could sign
Wilson and their top four picks, who all remain unsigned as we
speak. He called it a potential "grand slam." No argument there. It
would be a transformative draft. Now let's see it happen.
As
I sat in my $145 overpriced seat tonight I had a realization. All
seAson Cardinal Nation has been waiting for the inconsistent play
to end. Well, it's never going to end. I learned this tonight and I
am passing on this wisdom to the rest of the wave riders.
Joe Strauss: Duly noted,
sir. Your assessment is catching on elsewhere.
Joe,
With the trade deadline coming up Saturday are the Cardinals close to anything? I heard the nemes David Bush , L. Herndenez ,and Brett Myers. The only 1 that excites me would be Myers. Any suprises that Mo might be working on
With the trade deadline coming up Saturday are the Cardinals close to anything? I heard the nemes David Bush , L. Herndenez ,and Brett Myers. The only 1 that excites me would be Myers. Any suprises that Mo might be working on
Joe Strauss: You must
have checked out a Baseball Prospects report today that fired some
scatter-shot rumors. All those names are available. Hernandez has
intrigued the Cardinals for years, especially when Walt Jocketty
served as GM. (Last I heard, the Reds are looking for a starting
pitcher as well.) Myers could become an interesting fallback if the
Astros realize they can not get what they consider is fair value
for Oswalt. He has advocates within the Cardinals organization as a
short-term upgrade. Ted Lilly is available but I question the Cubs'
willingness to deal with the Cardinals. The Cardinals have had
interest in the Cleveland Indians' Westbrook and Carmona. Something
is going to happen. Typically, a deal starts to crystalize 3-4 days
before being finalized. Looking at my calendar, we're three days
away from the non-waiver trade deadline. The deadline's passing
doesn't mean something still can't happen. Woody Williams and Larry
Walker, for example, were acquired in August.
Hi Joe.
I dont understand WHY other teams are not intrested in trading for
our hitting prospects like Allen Craig,Steven Hill,Daniel
Descalso,Mark Hamilton or Tyler Hensley or our pitching prospects
like P.J.Walters,Lance Lynn,Adam Reifer,Eduardo Sanchez,Ryan
Kulik,Scott Gorgen,Josh Kinney?? Do non of these guys project into
good major league starters or closers?? I mean it looks to me we
should be able to trade for example McCellen,Ryan/or Schumaker + 2
of the prospects for Oswalt,or a different package for Greinke?? If
i was the GM for the Astros i would ask for Craig,Kyle
McClellan,Descalso,& eather Walters,Reifer or Sanchez for
Oswalt. Could we have not put together a better package of
prospects,see above list,than the Angels for Haren?? Lets cut the
junk about last years 2 trades raided our minor league system.
Perez was already on the 25 man roster. YES Todd & Wallice will
be GOOD MAJOR LEAGUE players but Mortenson maybe a 5th
starter,& Peterson a 4th or 5th outfielder they were not
exactly Gibson & Brock!!! So we traded 2 good prospects 3 if
you count Perez. Is our farm system that bad???? Anyway PLEASE tell
me why other teams dont want any of our prospects in a trade???
THANK YOU. Bryan
Joe Strauss: You've been
listening to waaaaaay too much Sunday morning baseball chat on the
radio.
These players are seen as complementary pieces to a trade, not deal-makers. The Cardinals are on record as saying they don't possess minor-league starting pitching that can help a championship club. If they admit that, what do you think other clubs see? Any impact deal would likely subtrace from the major-league clubhouse. Brendan Ryan and Kyle McClellan's names were mentioned during talks regarding Oswalt. McClellan may project as a starting pitcher elsewhere. Except for Shelby Miller, there is no starting in the system currently considered very likely to become anything more than a No. 5 major-league starter. Adam Ottavino may be an exception, but his shoulder concerns put him under a far different light.
These players are seen as complementary pieces to a trade, not deal-makers. The Cardinals are on record as saying they don't possess minor-league starting pitching that can help a championship club. If they admit that, what do you think other clubs see? Any impact deal would likely subtrace from the major-league clubhouse. Brendan Ryan and Kyle McClellan's names were mentioned during talks regarding Oswalt. McClellan may project as a starting pitcher elsewhere. Except for Shelby Miller, there is no starting in the system currently considered very likely to become anything more than a No. 5 major-league starter. Adam Ottavino may be an exception, but his shoulder concerns put him under a far different light.
How comfortable are you going into a playoff series, 5 or 7 games,
with our current rotation? I'm not banking too much on Garcia in
the playoffs due to his lack of experience and the possibility of
him fading by that point. Lohse is far from a given. If Carp or
Waino lose one of their starts in a series, this team would be in
quite a bit of trouble. Would Jake Westbrook be a reliable
postseason pitcher?
Joe Strauss: I'd be far
more uncomfortable with the team's passing attention to fundamental
play. The Cardinals sacrificed 3-6 outs either through poor defense
or baserunning hijinx in all three games at Wrigley. Unless you're
mashing, do that against a playoff team and you're dimissed very
quickly.
Hello
JS,
It's been obvious for more than a year now that Pujols has gone away from trying to hit the ball where it is pitched, and is trying to pull almost all pitches, even breaking pitches away. Worse yet, his mighty swing, which used to be so straight and level that it was a marvel to behold, now often loops through the strike zone, so that if he doesn't time the pitch just right, he rolls over on it and hits a ground ball to third or short. I know he is so talented he can excel even with these flaws, but isn't someone able to show him on tape the difference between his approach now and his approach of old? It isn't hard to see.
It's been obvious for more than a year now that Pujols has gone away from trying to hit the ball where it is pitched, and is trying to pull almost all pitches, even breaking pitches away. Worse yet, his mighty swing, which used to be so straight and level that it was a marvel to behold, now often loops through the strike zone, so that if he doesn't time the pitch just right, he rolls over on it and hits a ground ball to third or short. I know he is so talented he can excel even with these flaws, but isn't someone able to show him on tape the difference between his approach now and his approach of old? It isn't hard to see.
Joe Strauss: Albert's
ability to self-correct is amazing. But the tendencies you cite are
noted by others, especially his greater bent toward pulling the
ball. Many coaches believe it is best to wait for an established
major-league hitter to approach them rather than stronarm their
advice. With Pujols, you're talking about arguably the greatest
hitter of his generation. That's not to say he isn't coachable. I'm
just reiterating is he very good at correcting himself. Given
Albert's stature, I would think the manager would be best
positioned to offer such an observation.
Joe, do
you have a sense one way or the other as to where the Cardinals
will end up next year on the radio dial? Dan Caesar doesn't hold a
weekly chat. Thanks!
Joe Strauss: Purely
speculation. But I believe there will be a modification to the
current set-up, either returning to KMOX or involving WXOS-FM to
some degree. You make a great suggestion. Caesar needs to do a
weekly chat. Just get him off the poker table. Hail Caesar!!!
Joe
S-L-O-W. Physically and mentally, this word describes the team. They always seem to be at least one step slow in the field and on the bases. The physical is undoubtedly injury and lack of natural gifts but the mental seems to be a consistent lack of energy, focus and good judgment. It is clearly an identity since it goes back to last season. As much as I like and respect TLR, I have begun to wonder if the team no longer listens to him. As I recall that was Whitey's reason for quitting after 10 years as manager and Tony has another half-decade on him.
Any insight into this malaise? Thanks for your time
S-L-O-W. Physically and mentally, this word describes the team. They always seem to be at least one step slow in the field and on the bases. The physical is undoubtedly injury and lack of natural gifts but the mental seems to be a consistent lack of energy, focus and good judgment. It is clearly an identity since it goes back to last season. As much as I like and respect TLR, I have begun to wonder if the team no longer listens to him. As I recall that was Whitey's reason for quitting after 10 years as manager and Tony has another half-decade on him.
Any insight into this malaise? Thanks for your time
Joe Strauss: It pretty
much boils down to a home-road thing. The Cardinals are a dominant
team at Busch Stadium but have won only three of their last 10 road
series. (They were swept once and are poised to lose another series
to the Mets.) The team plays less crisply on the road and averages
0.5 runs less per game away from Busch, which isn't exactly a
hitter's paradise. Very odd. Flip Lopez showing up late last
Saturday a day after meeting with TLR in his office isn't a good
sign. It's a different team, for sure.
Hi Joe,
Never understood the infatuation with Westbrook. He seems like Lohse in a lot of ways. What gives? Is he signed for next year, too?
Also...with an OBP almost below .400 and a BA almost 40 below career averages, can the world finally admit Albert is having a down year? Down year doesn't mean bad year, but it's still OK to say it.
dave
Never understood the infatuation with Westbrook. He seems like Lohse in a lot of ways. What gives? Is he signed for next year, too?
Also...with an OBP almost below .400 and a BA almost 40 below career averages, can the world finally admit Albert is having a down year? Down year doesn't mean bad year, but it's still OK to say it.
dave
Joe Strauss: Westbrook
is innings. Right now, the Cardinals have three starters who
haven't worked into the eighth inning this season. Lohse can't be
counted to do so for awhile after his return. At some point, the
coaching staff worries the toll will grow on what has been an
outstanding bullpen. As for Pujols' numbers, I was nearly
excommunicated after relating what others saw as he reached the end
of a difficult June. Many pundits rated Albert as NL MVP in the
first half. Are we spoiled? Absolutely. Is he having a down year?
By Albert's standards, yes. Consistency has been Pujols' hallmark
for nine years. It's been a challenge in this, his 10th season.
We've already noted a couple theories why.
I think
any trade the cards do should center on Luddy, Craig and/or
Hawksworth. I am not as hard on our minor system as it seems to
have produced some good player just look at the talent we have on
our roster. Next season I believe that the arbitration for Luddy it
is going to be too much for us to afford with Albert’s contract
needing to be redone. I also think that adding another quality
pitcher will help if god forbids we cannot resign Albert. That is
why I believed either Harren or Oswalt would be a great trade.
Pitching is always going to win you more games in a season than 1
batter in your line up. If Albert’s contract gets redone than trade
Lohse to get back some cash and prospects. Do you think Mo thinks
about the trade deadline in these terms?
Joe Strauss: Here's my
take on Lud': It's not inconceivable the Cardinals trade him before
he reaches free agency. However, it would appear the Cardinals
could find better value this winter than at the trading deadline.
Unless a match could occur with a pitching-heavy team like Atlanta,
what contender is going to move a core piece at this time of the
season? Does a player like Ludwick, approaching his final
arbitration year and sure to cost more than $7 million next season,
help a rebuilding club? Not unless such a club immediately signs
him to an extension. The timing appears wrong for a Ludwick trade.
And, oh, the Cardinals could definitely use his bat.
JoeAlmighty,
I really like Felipe Lopez. He brings enthusiasm and very good offense to the team. Why hasn't he been able to significantly improve his defense? He has been in the big leagues long enough to realize that his defensive short comings have prevented him to become a potential all star at 2B. His sub par defensive skills have been about the same for years now. What gives?
I really like Felipe Lopez. He brings enthusiasm and very good offense to the team. Why hasn't he been able to significantly improve his defense? He has been in the big leagues long enough to realize that his defensive short comings have prevented him to become a potential all star at 2B. His sub par defensive skills have been about the same for years now. What gives?
Joe Strauss: Felipe is
versatile and he's a solid hitter. He's inconsistent defensively,
which makes it difficult for a good team to assign him an everyday
position. He also threw much better early in the season before
developing elbow soreness. He's changed teams five times the last
five seasons and signed for a $1 million guarantee this spring.
He's 30. At some point you recognize that the player you see is the
player you get. That's Flip.
Please note I am not putting Jon Jay in the HOF but from what I've
what watched he plays better defense, hustles better, and seems to
be more disciplined at the plate than Rasmus. I know he doesn't
have the power of Colby. That being said, would the Mozeliak
consider trading Rasmus to get a top tiered pitcher?
Joe Strauss: The cost
savings and potential Rasmus represent are extremely value to a
club approaching an increasingly top-heavy payroll. Less than a
month ago Raz' was leading the league in OPS. He's very streaky.
He's also very young and appears to have a hard time
self-correcting after several off games. Sounds like a guy who
needs to learn himself better. There may be other reasons the club
may eventually ponder dealing Rasmus, but I don't think the current
need for a starting pitcher is one of them.
Joe,
Thank you for taking my question. How is Freese doing and when can we expect him back?
Thank you for taking my question. How is Freese doing and when can we expect him back?
Joe Strauss: It's
appeared in the Post-Dispatch that Freese likely won't return
before the second week of August. I've heard no information to
change that forecast. The toe injury he sustained during a workout
likely set him back 2-3 weeks, according to my information. Since
the toe injury occurred on his left foot, favoring it would only
complicate the right ankle issues he's confronted for more than a
month.
Chatmeister,
My bachelor party is this Saturday night, and we're starting off the night at the Cardinal game, in the all you can drink seats of course. Would the chatmeister like to join us for some debauchery during/after the game? Maybe we can get some of the players to hit Wash Ave with us.
My bachelor party is this Saturday night, and we're starting off the night at the Cardinal game, in the all you can drink seats of course. Would the chatmeister like to join us for some debauchery during/after the game? Maybe we can get some of the players to hit Wash Ave with us.
Joe Strauss: You have my
e-mail. Details please. Always the chance the ChatMeister could
waive standard appearance fee given quality of entertainment. (Not
a word to Lady Diablo.)
Did the
Cards fall out on the deal for Roy Oswalt? Or is it still a
possibility?
Joe Strauss: Pessimism
currently reigns. My latest contact insisted, "It ain't
happening."
Mighty
Joe-
REDBIRDinNY and I witnessed last night's snoozefest at CitiField. Wow. I think the last time that I saw a team exhibit that much excitement, energy, and enthusiasm was during my most recent visit to my local New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles office. This team is playing like a team playing out the string in September, not one "fighting" (I use that term loosely) for the division crown. Where is the ENERGY? Where is the HEART? I'm really hoping that Mo will swing a deal just to shake things up a little. They need a big-time wake-up call!
REDBIRDinNY and I witnessed last night's snoozefest at CitiField. Wow. I think the last time that I saw a team exhibit that much excitement, energy, and enthusiasm was during my most recent visit to my local New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles office. This team is playing like a team playing out the string in September, not one "fighting" (I use that term loosely) for the division crown. Where is the ENERGY? Where is the HEART? I'm really hoping that Mo will swing a deal just to shake things up a little. They need a big-time wake-up call!
Joe Strauss: The DMV
reference allows you to hit the board. Your questions are
rhetorical. The ChatMeister doesn't do rhetoric, unless it's his
own.
I have
been told that high school pitcher Tyrell Jenkins, one of our
supplemental draft choices, was in St. Louis yesterday for a
physical and I assume his signing is imminent. Since he is also a
Baylor football/baseball recruit, do you think he will get more
than slot money, which is $705,600.?
Joe Strauss: Jenkins
would likely command more than slot. The Cardinals are believed
close to signing two of their three high pitching picks, Seth Blair
and Jenkins.
Is Colby is
TLR's doghouse or is Jay just the better player right now? Does
anyone have any clue why Colby is such a streaky player, he seems
to be really in his head right now but I'm not sure what the
alternative is. He can't get out of his funk if hes not playing but
if he continues to struggle when he does play occasionally that
just gives him more to think about the next 2 days taht he sits. Is
their a solution to this issue?
Joe Strauss: Right now
Jay may be the best player on the team. He is definitely the hot
hand. The Cardinals can't afford to sit him in hopes of getting
Raz' going. Right now, Rasmus is on the wrong end of a Catch-22. He
needs to play to get hot but until he shows more it's very
difficult for TLR to sit Jay. For now, the manager projects Ludwick
will play 2 of every three games. Lud' may sit tonight, even
against a LH starter.
Great Surfmeister of the Mississippi,
Most are saying Oswalt is staying put. Houston's owner clearly is in a state of denial. Knowing the Cards are looking at pitching help, has any serious consideration gone to acquiring Happ? Is it so verboden to have trades between potential post-season competitors that the Cards could not make a deal with the Phillies? Happ is young and a quality lefty. Myers is my other fav, and he proved last night he still has his stuff. Could the Cards fashion a trade for either of these two pitchers? And what would be the trade bait?
Hang 10!
Most are saying Oswalt is staying put. Houston's owner clearly is in a state of denial. Knowing the Cards are looking at pitching help, has any serious consideration gone to acquiring Happ? Is it so verboden to have trades between potential post-season competitors that the Cards could not make a deal with the Phillies? Happ is young and a quality lefty. Myers is my other fav, and he proved last night he still has his stuff. Could the Cards fashion a trade for either of these two pitchers? And what would be the trade bait?
Hang 10!
Joe Strauss: Myers
represents immediate help. The Phillies may use Happ for more
experienced pitching. The price for Myers would be significantly
less than for Oswalt. The Astros would like a shortstop and an
outfielder. At some point the Cardinals must decide on Tyler
Greene. They also must decide on whether Allen Craig fits in a
potential platoon or will always be considered a spare outfielder.
Reliever Fernando Salas appeals to some clubs. However, Salas has
been rarely seen with the parent club. The Cardinals also are out
of options with Hawksworth. He would be expendable if the Cardinals
landed a starting pitcher. Unless the Cardinals believe Bryan
Anderson next year's backup catcher -- opinions are mixed -- he
could be included. Anderson is hitting well at Memphis but remains
a project defensively.
With all the
talk about Westbrook and Myers why no love for Carmona?
Joe Strauss: Higher
asking price.
Hola, Jose.
Gracias por estas discusiones.
Sorry for the Spanish, but I've got a Pujols question for you and figured, out of respect for the mang, I would start things off in his native tongue. The question is: do you feel that, right now in his career, Pujols is a "clutch" player?
Obviously the guy has Hall of Fame talent. He has done things in baseball and put up numbers that nobody else has in the history of the game. He has been an absolute joy to watch over the years and I would love to have the chance to personally thank him for all he has brought to the Cardinals and to St. Louis. However, over the past couple seasons, it just seems like Albert has not been nearly as reliable in those "clutch," game-changing situations when the Cardinals are up by a run or two, the game is tied, or we trail by a run or two. Sure, his RISP numbers have been great (.341 this year, .361 last season, .339 in 2008), so I wonder if this is just a case of me stressing over the few times he doesn't come through and not remembering those times that he does. But it just feels like Pujols hasn't gotten that "big hit" nearly as often as he did earlier in his career. I can recall several road games this season alone when we got a runner or two on base in the first inning, but the opportunity for a big inning was derailed by an Albert out and instead of setting an early tone, we went on to lose the game. And this is something that I've thought about for the past two or three seasons.
Anyway, sorry about the long, drawn-out explanation for my simple question, but I figured a sage sports mind like yourself, who gets to watch the team -- and Pujols -- on a regular basis, would be able to put my concerns to rest.
Sorry for the Spanish, but I've got a Pujols question for you and figured, out of respect for the mang, I would start things off in his native tongue. The question is: do you feel that, right now in his career, Pujols is a "clutch" player?
Obviously the guy has Hall of Fame talent. He has done things in baseball and put up numbers that nobody else has in the history of the game. He has been an absolute joy to watch over the years and I would love to have the chance to personally thank him for all he has brought to the Cardinals and to St. Louis. However, over the past couple seasons, it just seems like Albert has not been nearly as reliable in those "clutch," game-changing situations when the Cardinals are up by a run or two, the game is tied, or we trail by a run or two. Sure, his RISP numbers have been great (.341 this year, .361 last season, .339 in 2008), so I wonder if this is just a case of me stressing over the few times he doesn't come through and not remembering those times that he does. But it just feels like Pujols hasn't gotten that "big hit" nearly as often as he did earlier in his career. I can recall several road games this season alone when we got a runner or two on base in the first inning, but the opportunity for a big inning was derailed by an Albert out and instead of setting an early tone, we went on to lose the game. And this is something that I've thought about for the past two or three seasons.
Anyway, sorry about the long, drawn-out explanation for my simple question, but I figured a sage sports mind like yourself, who gets to watch the team -- and Pujols -- on a regular basis, would be able to put my concerns to rest.
Joe Strauss: I'll answer
with a question: Who would you prefer to have up with the game in
the balance? Not being flip. Seriously.
Wavemaster
J,
I laughed a dark, bitter laugh at your mention of the team's new "effort chart" in a recent article. Can you elaborate on the structure (and reception) of this project?
I laughed a dark, bitter laugh at your mention of the team's new "effort chart" in a recent article. Can you elaborate on the structure (and reception) of this project?
Joe Strauss: First base
coach Dave McKay posted it about a decade ago when another
Cardinals team was underachieving. It allows coaches to post red
dots when a player makes a mental mistake or commits a fundamental
boo-boo. (Players also receive positive mention as well.)
Basically, it's a quiet way to call out guys who aren't getting it
done. However, after watching the Cubs series, when Holliday failed
to run out a dropped third strike, several others showed marginal
interest in running out ground balls and tardiness occurred, one
has to wonder if the "effort chart" is allowed to travel. Didn't
see it in the Wrigley clubhouse. But it's a cute story, even after
a loss.
I know Colby's
young and still maturing and the Cardinals have invested a lot in
him and would be reluctant to give him up, especially with his
supposedly five-tool potential. However, I am tired of his
streakiness, his moodiness, what seems like needing his dad every
time he goes into a funk, and his defensive mistakes. I wouldn't be
surprised if he becomes the next Anthony Reyes, someone with a lot
of talent who can't harness it well enough to perform up to his
abilities. Especially with the emergence of Jay (yes, I know he's
only been up for a short time, but again, I'm fed up with Rasmus),
have there been any rumblings in the front office about putting
Rasmus on the block? What would he fetch, and would it
significantly help the Oswalt deal if he were available?
Joe Strauss: Making Raz'
available might indeed get the Oswalt deal done. Again, the club is
downplaying the Oswalt talks as virtually dead, suggesting to me
they aren't willing to dangle the young center fielder.
Are either Pujols or Molina hurt? They both rean badly Tuesday, and
Pujols gripped his side at leat once?
Joe Strauss: Molina is
playing with a badly bruised shin. I'm not in NY so I can't speak
to what may appear to be an oblique problem. It was interesting to
note in Chicago that Pujols hit several fly balls to right field,
more than I can remember in any series this season. He also smoked
two balls Sunday, one that left the yard and another that was
pushed back to the LF warning track. Results are ambiguous whether
he is playing hurt.
I agree
with Jeff Gordon...Myers or Ted Lilly make much more sense than
Oswalt. Blake Hawksworth & Mitchell Boggs are ready to move as
are Greene, Craig and Anderson. If we move Greene and Ryan who can
we get to play SS?
I believe Lohse will prove key in the stretch run, with Garcia being watched closely due to his surgery.
I believe Lohse will prove key in the stretch run, with Garcia being watched closely due to his surgery.
Joe Strauss: No way the
team moves both Greene and Ryan before season's end.
I see where
Pujols grabbed his left side while running out a ground ball last
night in NY. I know he says he's just "not found it" this season,
but is the man hurt? I'd much rather see him sit for a few days now
than for the month of September! I know he plays well with injury,
but we need his bat and obviously, something's wrong.
Joe Strauss: My
information was that he played with significant "lower body"
discomfort for much of June. He has had foot issues early this year
and is a chronic risk for hamstring pulls. Again, I haven't heard
anything new today regarding his condition. Just contacted Jr.
Goold, who says Albert IS in tonight's lineup along with
Raz'.
Joe
Have you heard who the Cards are prepared to offer for whatever starting pitching falls their way. Count me in as one who is intrigued by Jay, and would hate to see him moved for a 2 month rental. Craig would seem to me to have value, is there much interest in him from other teams?
Have you heard who the Cards are prepared to offer for whatever starting pitching falls their way. Count me in as one who is intrigued by Jay, and would hate to see him moved for a 2 month rental. Craig would seem to me to have value, is there much interest in him from other teams?
Joe Strauss: Craig has
value, but only as a complementary piece to a trade. Would take
more for a pitching upgrade.
Someone needs to mention to the Mizzou Athletics Director that if
they want to be more respected in the polls and more desirable to
other major conferences that playing McNeese State during
non-conference games is no way to gain respect.
If Mizzou fancies itself to be a major player during the next round of conference realignment they need to schedule some big boys home and away. Beating small non-conference opponents is fine if Mizzou is happy with their current conference situation but is no way to gain national respect among other major conferences that Mizzou might want to join in the future. As an SEC fan, I can tell you that there is zero respect for Mizzou. Your take?
If Mizzou fancies itself to be a major player during the next round of conference realignment they need to schedule some big boys home and away. Beating small non-conference opponents is fine if Mizzou is happy with their current conference situation but is no way to gain national respect among other major conferences that Mizzou might want to join in the future. As an SEC fan, I can tell you that there is zero respect for Mizzou. Your take?
Joe Strauss: Preaching
to the choir, brother. Been saying it for years. Apparently
Not-So-Big 12 Commish Dan Beebe noted as much at this week's
conference mediafest in Dallas. Mizzou types don't like hearing
that you are who you beat. But it's true. Mizzou hasn't beaten
much. They've graduated to an above-average regional program. Count
me among those disappointed Mizzou never took its high-flying act
national when they had the chance.
My take: Road kill competition = wins; wins = equal job security and big pay raises for AD's and coaches.
Until the alumni demand more than mid-level bowl appearances it won't change. And if you're Mizzou, don't whine about a disappointing bowl assignment then get schooled by less athletically gifted Navy. You're not in Kansas anymore, Toto. We now return to regularly scheduled ball talk.
My take: Road kill competition = wins; wins = equal job security and big pay raises for AD's and coaches.
Until the alumni demand more than mid-level bowl appearances it won't change. And if you're Mizzou, don't whine about a disappointing bowl assignment then get schooled by less athletically gifted Navy. You're not in Kansas anymore, Toto. We now return to regularly scheduled ball talk.
Joe,
do the Rams win more games than either of the current fourth and
fifth starters for the Cardinals this season? Can I get an
over/under on this from Vegas?
Joe Strauss: Rams O/U
wins: 3.5. Hint: They haven't won 4 since 2006.
Interesting
thought from Jeff Gordon today on why the Cards should focus on
Brett Myers instead of Oswalt. PLUS, it doesn't look like the
offense is going to correct itself any time soon. This team needs
an offensive boost badly. Any reason to believe they might go out
and grab a bat as well as as pitcher?
Joe Strauss: Did you say
"interesting thought" and "Jeff Gordon?" Excuse me, we must have a
bad connection. (Seriously, though, Myers does make sense for the
Cardinals.)
Great
One
Ok you run the Cardinals with total control "Boss" type control.
What trade, trades, or what would you do to get to the playoffs?
Do you think how long will it take for Colby to become real player we thought he would be? I really like Colby and want to see him be a sucess.
Was the Letterman appearance another move by Albert on his way out of town?
I would hope that Albert would retire a Cardinal.
Ok you run the Cardinals with total control "Boss" type control.
What trade, trades, or what would you do to get to the playoffs?
Do you think how long will it take for Colby to become real player we thought he would be? I really like Colby and want to see him be a sucess.
Was the Letterman appearance another move by Albert on his way out of town?
I would hope that Albert would retire a Cardinal.
Joe Strauss: Actually,
Albert, the Cardinals and Immigration & Naturalization claim
Albert is 30. If you have documentation to the contrary, feel feel
to contact me.
As Mo' is doing, another starting pitcher would solidify a deceptively frail rotation. Find an innings guy. Brett Myers has been one of the league's most consistent, if not most spectacular, pitchers this season. Yes, he's had off-field issues. So had Julio Lugo. Scott Spiezio had them while here. And so have others. You're investing in a player for two months. Myers has pitched for winning teams before. I part with a SS/OF and a developing arm for him.
I don't draw a connection between Pujols' Late Night appearance and a desire to skip St. Louis. I do believe he realizes visibility helps his Foundation. The guy's recognized as the best player in the game. It shouldn't be a big deal if he does TV on an off day.
As Mo' is doing, another starting pitcher would solidify a deceptively frail rotation. Find an innings guy. Brett Myers has been one of the league's most consistent, if not most spectacular, pitchers this season. Yes, he's had off-field issues. So had Julio Lugo. Scott Spiezio had them while here. And so have others. You're investing in a player for two months. Myers has pitched for winning teams before. I part with a SS/OF and a developing arm for him.
I don't draw a connection between Pujols' Late Night appearance and a desire to skip St. Louis. I do believe he realizes visibility helps his Foundation. The guy's recognized as the best player in the game. It shouldn't be a big deal if he does TV on an off day.
ChatMeister:
Your competitor/colleague/co-conspirator Matthew Leach reported last night the Cardinals are looking at shoring up the middle infield. He mentioned Dan Uggla as an option. Do you see that happening? If not, then who? Also, could the Cardinals manage to get Brett Myers and a Uggla/Kelly Johnson-type?
Thanks for your input.
Your competitor/colleague/co-conspirator Matthew Leach reported last night the Cardinals are looking at shoring up the middle infield. He mentioned Dan Uggla as an option. Do you see that happening? If not, then who? Also, could the Cardinals manage to get Brett Myers and a Uggla/Kelly Johnson-type?
Thanks for your input.
Joe Strauss: Mo' noted
in Chicago that he remains flexible if stymied for a starting
pitcher. The time is approaching when he must determine whether to
change course. Uggla is an intriguing name -- and certainly one who
would offer an offensive upgrade. He would also complicate payroll
behind this season at a position where the Cardinals have rarely
invested heavy dollars. I've pimped less pricey Kelly Johnson here
before but he has mixed reviews from Cardinals types. Acquiring
Uggla would almost certainly mean Ludwick's days in St. Louis are
numbered.
NEWS
BREAK: Apparently the ChatMeister wasn't the only one impressed by
MacDougal on Monday. The Cardinals have summoned him from Memphis,
optioning Salas.
Joe,
If TLR is not able to "right this ship" and this leads to another post season disappointment are we looking at his possible retirement? What a tough way to go after an amazing ride but there's too much talent and too much money spent on this club for them to be underachieving. Bad defense and baserunning are coachable issues to an extent and it's not getting any better. Are the players not buying it any longer?
If TLR is not able to "right this ship" and this leads to another post season disappointment are we looking at his possible retirement? What a tough way to go after an amazing ride but there's too much talent and too much money spent on this club for them to be underachieving. Bad defense and baserunning are coachable issues to an extent and it's not getting any better. Are the players not buying it any longer?
Joe Strauss: If this
team misses the postseason I believe it will give TLR serious
pause. He insists he evaluates whether his message is still getting
through to his team. Except for Scott Rolen, I know of no one who
has told TLR to his face he should not return as manager. Ownership
is on record saying TLR is essentially manager for life if he
wishes. Given a washout, it would be a tough call, I believe.
Joe,
I would like to see the Cardinals deal Colby Rasmus for an outstanding middle infielder or third baseman. Who would they be able to get for him. I believe getting rid of Jon jay would be a mistake. He reminds of a little of Mcgee and Lankford type players. From what I can see. I just have a hunch he is the real deal and can perform everyday.
Your thoughts.
I would like to see the Cardinals deal Colby Rasmus for an outstanding middle infielder or third baseman. Who would they be able to get for him. I believe getting rid of Jon jay would be a mistake. He reminds of a little of Mcgee and Lankford type players. From what I can see. I just have a hunch he is the real deal and can perform everyday.
Your thoughts.
Joe Strauss: Jon Jay is
proving a lot of people wrong right now. But just as it's foolish
to fall in or out of love in spring training or in September, let's
give Jay more than 100 at-bats before we proclaim him the next big
thing. He's exciting to watch and he's certainly done much to put
himself in next year's picture. Can he play CF? Don't know yet. Is
he more a run-producer or a run-scorer? Can he hold up? Jay had a
minor-league .425 Slg. and a .363 OBP before this year. (By
comparison, Schumaker was .385 Slg. and .354 OBP in the
minors.)
Our record
is abysmal when we score 3 or fewer runs - which we're doing with
regularity. Given the foregoing, why in the world are we going
after another pitcher instead of a hitter? The Reds seem to be
somewhat better right now, but if we get to the postseason, do we
really want to suffer through another 2009 Dodger postseason series
all over again, where we get good efforts from our pitchers who get
no support?
Joe Strauss: There still
exists a belief that this is a strong offensive team when whole. A
healthy Ludwick and Freese plus a productive Jay gives that stance
credibility. Rasmus has to get going, however, in order for the
Cardinals to have a deep look. They could still use another enforce
off the bench, preferably a LH-hitting one.
JSL
(bringing the Heat Wave),
I find it hard to believe that the Cards are not pursuing a middle-infielder. Can they really hope to ham-and-egg it with a SS that has only spent one full month (June) hitting north of the Mendoza line and a 2nd basemen whose lead-off capabilities & BA once justified a non-traditional move into the infield but now carries a 4.625 Zone Rating and 13 errors? I guess you can defend the team's position with the availability of Lopez once Freese returns to 3rd, but Lopez is batting .255 against lefties and .250 on the road.
I find it hard to believe that the Cards are not pursuing a middle-infielder. Can they really hope to ham-and-egg it with a SS that has only spent one full month (June) hitting north of the Mendoza line and a 2nd basemen whose lead-off capabilities & BA once justified a non-traditional move into the infield but now carries a 4.625 Zone Rating and 13 errors? I guess you can defend the team's position with the availability of Lopez once Freese returns to 3rd, but Lopez is batting .255 against lefties and .250 on the road.
Joe Strauss: It's fair
to say Flip gets exposed defensively at third base. As you note,
Freese provides a defensive upgrade while restoring flexibility
upon his return. A mix of Lopez, Ryan, Schu, Miles and Greene at
2B/SS is OK, though one would have to be
optioned/traded/released/disabled when Freese gets back. Ryan is
good enough at SS if the rest of the team hits. The Cardinals went
all-in on Schumaker at second base. It is what it is.
Joe-
Just finished reading Joe Posnanski's outstanding article on Stan the Man in this week's edition of Sports Illustrated. My initial reaction to this wonderful tribute was that this should be required reading for every true CARDINAL fan.
After reading the article a second time (yes, it's that good), I had a slightly different thought: every real BASEBALL fan should read this article.
All of St. Louis and Cardinal fans everywhere have long known what an absolute treasure we have in Stan the Man. Any one who takes the time to read this great piece can now join the club. Pass it on!
Just finished reading Joe Posnanski's outstanding article on Stan the Man in this week's edition of Sports Illustrated. My initial reaction to this wonderful tribute was that this should be required reading for every true CARDINAL fan.
After reading the article a second time (yes, it's that good), I had a slightly different thought: every real BASEBALL fan should read this article.
All of St. Louis and Cardinal fans everywhere have long known what an absolute treasure we have in Stan the Man. Any one who takes the time to read this great piece can now join the club. Pass it on!
Joe Strauss: Duly noted.
Hard to believe The Man was not among the top 10 outfielders
according to fan balloting for the all-Century team. That's
pathetic.
I saw that
Brett Myers had another stellar performance last night versus the
Cubs pitching a complete game and striking out 12. Would you be in
favor of the Cardinals picking him up now? What would it take to
acquire him? Also, what is his current salary and deal with when he
becomes a pending free agent?
Joe Strauss: Myers'
contract includes an $8 million mutual option for next season that
includes a $2 million buyout.
Our old friend
Walt J. was apparently in serious conversations with Seattle for
Cliff Lee despite their apparent depth of quality young starters.
Does that mean Roy Oswalt is on their radar screen so they have a
true ace to anchor the team? If not, what deals do you see the Reds
trying to make here for the stretch run?
Joe Strauss: Take it for
what it's worth, but the Reds are reported to be seriously involved
for Oswalt.
Sir,
I like Colby Rasmus, or at least I like Colby Rasmus when he isn't in one of his funks. I like Jon Jay a lotter though, even though his is a much shorter body of work. Would the Cardinals consider trading Rasmus as part of a mega-package of some sort?
I like Colby Rasmus, or at least I like Colby Rasmus when he isn't in one of his funks. I like Jon Jay a lotter though, even though his is a much shorter body of work. Would the Cardinals consider trading Rasmus as part of a mega-package of some sort?
Joe Strauss: I'll answer
again because yours is the most asked question today: The club does
not appear willing to part with Rasmus. He is under control for
four more years. He was leading the league in OPS less than a month
ago. Yes, he's in a funk. Yes, his body language riles some fans
and he does seem to have returned to the TLR double-wide doghouse.
But to deal him for a glorified rental goes against what this club
said it was about when it named Mo' GM. Would they move Raz' for
two years of Stephen Drew. Interesting question. Drew has two more
bites at arbitration and is represented by Scott Boras. There would
be much irony in trading a player some fans consider "the next
Drew" for the younger Drew.
Will Pujols
performance this season and next have a dramatic effect on the
Cardinals offer to him?
Joe Strauss: Mo' is on
record with the cryptic comment that the club will make an offer
appropriate for what it believes Pujols' future production will be
rather than his past production.
Wave
Rider, Thanks for taking my question from the edge of the desert.
Would the Astros be any more likely to trade Myers to the Cardinals
than they would Oswalt? I don't see a connection here as it seems
the Astros are ansy to trade with the Cardinals in general. Do you
think the Indian's Carmona would be a better get than Westbrook
considering overall he is having a better season? Thanks for your
take.
Joe Strauss: At this
point it appears the Cardinals have a better chance of acquiring
Myers than Oswalt.
Do
you believe the Cards will make a move before deadline? Pitcher or
Middle Infielder?
Joe Strauss: Yes. Still
more likely they land a pitcher. Could see a dumpster dive for a
second need.
Greetings from Nyack, NY - The Cardinals have made it a point in
recent years of entertaining their NYC area fans with wonderful,
Bad News Bears efforts on the day game following the night game
here -- who can forget Rick Ankiel's Dick Van Dyke stumbling,
staggering act in centerfield last year - LaRussa actually replaced
him in CF due to his "being under the weather".
Has the organization acknowledged the annual "wacky highjinks" on NY getaway day and possibly requested a little NYC moderation? Otherwise, I have seen this act a little too often and would just as well save the day off tomorrow if my team intends to party tonight away.
Has the organization acknowledged the annual "wacky highjinks" on NY getaway day and possibly requested a little NYC moderation? Otherwise, I have seen this act a little too often and would just as well save the day off tomorrow if my team intends to party tonight away.
Joe Strauss: You forget
the Scott Spiezio episode where he couldn't make it to the park,
supposedly because of flu-like symptoms, but actually remained at
the team hotel coming down from something far more serious.
Unfortunately, this year's road stumbles haven't been limited to
Citi Field.
Per Rosenthal we
are out of the Oswalt rumors per multiple sources. Is there a name
that you hear the Cards are in on a lot? I hear Westbrook quite a
bit but I am sure we are heavily interested in others.
Joe Strauss: Westbrook
is a legitimate name but is among the players most believe would
slip through waivers after Aug. 1. His price tag would likely be
less then.
i
noticed last night, as did Darling&Hernandez, Albert seems to
be hurt. My fear is that he tries to play through an injury and
gets shelved a long period. What do you know?
Joe
Strauss: I'm not there to ask. He is reportedly in
tonight's lineup.
What about Tyler
Green, Blake Hawksworth and Allen Craig for Edwin Jackson and
Stephen Drew???
Joe Strauss: That meth
is bad stuff.
is
Albert hurt? me, Keith and Ron think he is. My fear is he tries to
play through and ends up on the shelf for the stretch. O wonderOne,
what does Albert tell you?
Joe Strauss: Albert
looked fine at Wrigley Sunday. Wonder if he got jammed by Dennis
Leary during Monday's antics with Letterman? Stay tuned to
Cardinals Beat on the web site for details. Developing.
Wait. Joe, are
you saying that you think it's 50/50 AP comes back, or are you
saying that's how fans feel?
Joe Strauss: That's my
read. I believe a heavy majority of the fan base still believes
Albert is a cinch to return. He may return, but it's no cinch.
Those who believe that live in a CandyLand zip code.
Hey
Joe,
TLR of course has the rep, for good, and to some people bad, of mixing and matching a lot. That said, he will stick to players who perform well quite a bit. I wonder about the infield def. Eckstein and Grudz turned a lot of DPs. Do see a need to have a regular DP combo, allowing a few substitutions occasionally? I do, and if you do, who would it be? I still think T Greene offers more offense, certainly more power than Ryan and can benefit by playing a lot. Maybe Lopez would improve defensively by staying at second. Of course who plays 3rd for now? MIles, Craig?
Let me know what you think. Thanks.
TLR of course has the rep, for good, and to some people bad, of mixing and matching a lot. That said, he will stick to players who perform well quite a bit. I wonder about the infield def. Eckstein and Grudz turned a lot of DPs. Do see a need to have a regular DP combo, allowing a few substitutions occasionally? I do, and if you do, who would it be? I still think T Greene offers more offense, certainly more power than Ryan and can benefit by playing a lot. Maybe Lopez would improve defensively by staying at second. Of course who plays 3rd for now? MIles, Craig?
Let me know what you think. Thanks.
Joe Strauss: Bottom
line: Cardinals have a lot of complementary pieces in the middle
infield. Any of them can become exposed if played daily. When
someone like Freese gets hurt the likelihood of overexposure
increases when a player (Lopez) is removed from the mix.
Has there been
any consideration to sending Rasmus down to Memphis for a brief
retooling? Or does the team need to keep his Daddy around at all
times?
Joe Strauss: I'll pass
on the Tony Rasmus question. However, the club will face a hard
decision when all of its players return from the disabled list.
They do retain the ability to option Rasmus. I haven't heard that
it is being considered. However, if TLR decides to make Jay his
regular CF, it would be foolish to rule it out, especially with a
roster crunch approaching. The club likely realizes collateral
damage from such a move would be disastrous.
Mr.
Strauss:
I don't believe Albert Pujols will keep his streak of .300/30/100 going this year. In Chicago he says he's still searching, but then in New York he says he's not. I tend to believe he's still searching as evidence by his batting average.
Do you believe he will reach .300/30/100 this year?
Thank you,
Bruce
I don't believe Albert Pujols will keep his streak of .300/30/100 going this year. In Chicago he says he's still searching, but then in New York he says he's not. I tend to believe he's still searching as evidence by his batting average.
Do you believe he will reach .300/30/100 this year?
Thank you,
Bruce
Joe Strauss: He'll
achieve the production numbers if healthy. It is surprising Albert
is below .300 four months into the season. I would bet through
sheer will, if nothing else, he will hit .300 for the season.
Mr.
Chat,
Do you know from interactions with the players if they ever read the content from STL Today?
JSL!!!, Bernie Bytes and Junior Goold's essays being the big draws of course. The Crisis Center (cards talk) would probably not draw a lot of attention.
thanks!
Do you know from interactions with the players if they ever read the content from STL Today?
JSL!!!, Bernie Bytes and Junior Goold's essays being the big draws of course. The Crisis Center (cards talk) would probably not draw a lot of attention.
thanks!
Joe Strauss: The
clubhouse is acutely aware of what's in the paper and on the site,
I assure you.
Did anyone
within the Cardinals organization comment on Holliday's refusal to
run out a dropped third strike Friday afternoon? The ball got quite
a ways away from Soto AND Jay was standing on 3rd for a potential
run. How does a $120 million player not run 90 feet? This is the
second time this has happened this year (the first an extra inning
loss in Philly). Thoughts?
Joe Strauss: It's not a
problem unless the Cardinals say it's a problem. The Cardinals say
it's not a problem. I wonder if they would believe it's a problem
if B. Ryan had shut it down? I wonder if he wonders that?
Joe, How's your
holdem game these days? Do you ever get a chance to play at the
Taj, while in NYC--if so how is it? I believe an acquisition of
Uggla might well be the missing ingredient for this team. Do we
have the components to construct such a deal with Fla?
Joe Strauss: The
Cardinals can likely do an Uggla deal given the money coming their
way. But do they commit such resources, perhaps eliminating their
chance to acquire pitching help. Do the Marlins plan to move
Ramirez off SS? Ryan might fit then. Otherwise, one would assume
Jon Jay, perhaps Tyler Greene and a major-league reliever
(McClellan, Boggs, Motte) would have to be involved. McClellan, as
stated before, holds value because of his potential to start. All
organizations love power arms but the Marlins almost make it a
prerequisite for the pen. Boggs and Motte qualify.
Haven't been to the Taj in awhile. Borgata has stolen much of its thunder.
Haven't been to the Taj in awhile. Borgata has stolen much of its thunder.
What are the
chances Austin Wilson ends up signing?
Joe Strauss: Still less
than 50-50. But the fact I'm even discussing it is reason for
optimism within the Cardinals front office. Initially they thought
it likely a token pick. Wilson really enjoyed his visit to St.
Louis. Apparently his family did as well. Intriguing.
The esteemed
Mr. Strauss:
I want to ask a follow-up on an earlier answer you provided. You mentioned several others showed marginal interest in (basically) putting forth max effort after observing Holliday's lackluster effort.
My question is: How can professional ballplayers let their teammates' level of effort affect their own? Don't they know about pride, or personal responsibility?
And if what you said truly occurred, I don't know how much blame one can put on LaRussa. "You can lead a horse to water, but...."
I want to ask a follow-up on an earlier answer you provided. You mentioned several others showed marginal interest in (basically) putting forth max effort after observing Holliday's lackluster effort.
My question is: How can professional ballplayers let their teammates' level of effort affect their own? Don't they know about pride, or personal responsibility?
And if what you said truly occurred, I don't know how much blame one can put on LaRussa. "You can lead a horse to water, but...."
Joe Strauss: No, I
believe my implication was that some wonder about different players
being held to different standards. If you see something, you can be
certain the players see it. (Holliday is well respected within the
clubhouse. His "lapse" was seen as more an exception than a trend,
though it did happen previously this season in AZ.)
If you were
pitching, and you had to choose between greene and ryan, who would
it be?
Joe Strauss: Ryan is a
potential Gold Glove shortstop. Both are very good athletes. But
Ryan is the better defender (when he's focused). If I'm a pitcher,
I want airtight defense behind me.
I live in
Pennsylvania so I only get to watch the Cardinals when they are on
ESPN or if they're playing the Phillies or Mets. Every time they're
on and Tony has the pitcher hitting eighth, the announcers comment
on it every time the pitcher comes up. Ron Darling and Keith
Hernandez went on and on about it last night. I actually think it
works pretty well most times. What is your take on it.
Joe Strauss: I think
it's a diversion. Seems to be working with you.
Having heard
you state all season that Rasmus was going no where it was
surprising to have you state "There may be other reasons the club
may eventually ponder dealing Rasmus, but I don't think the current
need for a starting pitcher is one of them."
What would those reasons be? He has batted in the 1,2,4,5,6, and 7 positions this season, and has no idea each day if he is playing or in what position. Don't you think this might have an afffect on his ability to stay consistent. Other players on this team have been or currently are in these funks, yet get trotted out there everyday.
I find it difficult to believe that a player that had the troops clamoring for an all star birth a month ago is now being called among other things, a moron, idiot, stupid, low IQ, slow learning, etc. while demanding that he be traded off.
My guess is either he or the great one TLR is back next year, but not both.
What would those reasons be? He has batted in the 1,2,4,5,6, and 7 positions this season, and has no idea each day if he is playing or in what position. Don't you think this might have an afffect on his ability to stay consistent. Other players on this team have been or currently are in these funks, yet get trotted out there everyday.
I find it difficult to believe that a player that had the troops clamoring for an all star birth a month ago is now being called among other things, a moron, idiot, stupid, low IQ, slow learning, etc. while demanding that he be traded off.
My guess is either he or the great one TLR is back next year, but not both.
Joe Strauss: Hmmmmmm.
Interesting observation.
What do you
think about Jose Lopez?
Joe Strauss: A talented
young player who has been a big part of the Mariners' offensive
woes this year. Has has little success against RH pitching this
season. He's also dealing with a hamstring strain. Lopez is
primarily a third baseman, which appears a poor fit unless Freese
is debilitated much longer than the club has suggested. Given
current conditions, I don't see the match.
Pujols
and Greene for Johnson and Uggla?
Joe Strauss: Interesting
comment. It's not going to happen, but Pujols has listed the
Marlins as one of the six teams to which he would accept a
trade.
Ken
Rosenthal just tweeted about possible interest in Miguel Tejada.
What do you think he would cost, and more importantly, if there is
any actual interest, how big of an upgrade over Ryan/Greene would
he be? Seems to me, based on this seasons numbers, he is a little
better offensively (while his D appears to be atrocious), but he
definitely is not the difference maker they need.
Joe Strauss: TLR has
long liked Tejada. He is in serious decline as a regular as his
slugging percentage is 100 points below his career number while his
OBP stands at .309. Tejada is now primarily a singles hitter who
rarely walks. He does match Mozeliak's definition of an
"ice-breaker" who might enliven a sometimes funereal clubhouse.
Tejada, 36, might rebound with a contender. The Cardinals have
followed the Orioles, though most have assumed it involves Jeremy
Guthrie, whose numbers strongly suggest an improvement in
performance with a change in scenery.
That's
going to be a wrap for a super-long chat. I believe today was a
record for a non-Winter Meetings conversation. We'll return next
Wednesday for follow-up to the trade deadline (in)activity. Things
can change rapidly at this time of year. No one in Los Angeles saw
Dan Haren coming. I wouldn't be surprised at the Cardinals making
more than one move with perhaps one out of left field (or the left
side of the bullpen). Thanks for your interest. It's what creates
The Wave.
