|
City Council backs going ahead with mayoral election
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
KIRKWOOD — City Council members on Thursday voiced their support for moving forward with next month's mayoral election despite pleas from some residents to postpone it. Only Karr and Councilman Arthur McDonnell had filed to run for mayor of the city. Mayor Mike Swoboda, who was shot by Thornton but survived, had not sought re-election due to term limits. In mid-February, the council was informed by county election officials that Karr was not an eligible candidate because she had died. So the council voted to removed Karr's name from the ballot. Acting Mayor Tim Griffin has said that Karr's widowed husband, Kevin Karr, made it clear that he did not want his family to go through an election with her name on the ballot. But a mayoral election that offers just one candidate has some residents seething, and prompted the formation of "Kirkwood Coming Together for a Brighter Future." Members of the group believe some city leaders are using the shootings for political purposes and to deny residents the right to vote in a contested election for mayor. Member Dick Reeves, 67, said residents deserve an elected mayor, not an appointed one. "What we're looking for in Kirkwood is democracy," Reeves said.
RELATED LINKS
COMPLETE COVERAGE
COLUMNS/OPINION
VIDEO
OTHER MULTIMEDIA
Other residents who spoke Thursday, including Doris Dana, 78, supported going ahead with the election. She said uncontested races are common in local cities and that democracy is not hindered. Said Dana: "Do we want to tell our neighbors that they are holding undemocratic elections?" lthorsen@post-dispatch.com 314-340-8126 Write a letter to the editor | Subscribe to a newsletter | Subscribe to the newspaper reader comments
COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in the STLtoday community, but we ask you to follow
our guidelines. Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity.
Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments.
Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable.
|
yesterday's most emailed
|