Dear Dr. Fox • We have a 7-year-old yellow Labrador retriever who was diagnosed with diabetes last July.
Although caught early, the vet prescribed too low a dose of Humulin N insulin, causing the dog to lose his appetite and 20 pounds. He also developed neuropathy in his hindquarters, causing him not to be able to walk. For two weeks, the vet couldn’t get it under control, so we took him to another vet, who increased his dosage, and he started responding. He began to eat, and after two weeks was able to get up and walk again.
It seems to have aged him, but he still wants to go for walks — although shorter than normal for a 7-year-old Lab. He’s been on Hills W/D prescription food and his weight has been pretty stable at 73 pounds. I monitor his glucose, but it seems to fluctuate, and every couple of weeks the vet has me increase the insulin. He’s now at 30 units twice a day. I also feel he is still drinking more water than normal. The costs, between the prescription food and insulin, are getting ridiculous. Do you have any suggestions on why his glucose isn’t leveling off, and maybe alternative treatments? — M.W.F., Interlaken, N.J.
Dear M.W.F. • You and your poor dog have my sympathy. There is a strong genetic basis for the development of this pancreatic hormonal deficiency disease, possibly triggered in susceptible dogs by what their mothers were fed, and what they themselves eat — namely, a high-carbohydrate diet with high glycemic-index ingredients such as corn.
As with diabetic people, dogs may also benefit from a daily supplement of powdered cinnamon (1 teaspoon per 50 pounds of body weight, mixed in with food). I, and others, have written critically about these manufactured prescription foods (see my book “Not Fit for a Dog: The Truth About Manufactured Cat & Dog Food”). Your dog may well fare better on a home-prepared diet such as those developed by veterinarians and available for sale in recipe format from Balance IT: phone number 1-888-346-6362, website Secure.balanceit.com. Also check veterinarian D.R. Strombeck’s website: dogcathomeprepareddiet.com.
Dear Dr. Fox • I have read your column for years and find it a wonderful resource for animal lovers and pet owners.
Recently, your column has featured numerous articles denouncing the trap-neuter-return method of feral cat population control. As a lifetime resident of Washington, I have seen the positive impact that TNR has had on our community and I am very surprised at your position. I would be eager to learn more about what you have personally observed and experienced, and what has led you to believe that TNR is not a humane population-control method.
In my experience, TNR has been an effective and humane approach to the abandoned pet crisis in my area. In my opinion, your columns have not explained the method adequately. I would appreciate it if you could clarify what approach you think might be best, and address the systems for population control that were in place before TNR. — H. H-D., Washington
Dear H. H-D. • I would say that I have yet to see one scientific study confirming that a well-maintained group of feral cats had no adverse impact on indigenous wildlife, that no cat needing veterinary care was ever left untreated, and that the presence of the feral cat colony reduced the number of stray cats in the contiguous community/ecozone, which is a common claim.
I did include a letter in my column advocating horse-barn and hobby-farm placements of feral cats, which I see as a possibility, but not without disease risks to humans, as well as to cats and other animals. Feeding colonies of outdoor cats also feeds competing wildlife such as raccoons, rats and opossums, and sets up a feeding station for wild carnivores — notably coyotes, who are cat eaters.