Here's a transcript of the
questions and answers from Wednesday's live chat with Post-Dispatch
bseball writer Joe Strauss:
We're
Live!!! and ready to mount the big wave for this week's edition of
Cardinals chat. After last week's underpublicized session generated
only tepid response (i.e., hundreds of questions rather than the
typical thousands), we're fully armed with reams of inquiries from
"Baseball's Best Fans." Without further delay, let's dive in only
five days short of next week's General Managers Meetings in
Orlando.
Do you think Cardinals
ownership and management sometimes forget or take for granted that
their own legacies are in large part defined by the emergence of
Albert Pujols from a middle of the road prospect to now the best
baseball player of this generation? Since 2000, the ownership has
profited enormously from the contributions of this one man, and yet
they seem to proceed in this re-signing process like it is Pujols
who needs to keep things in perspective if he wants to finish his
career in St. Louis. I understand that no business can just hand
any employee a blank check for them to fill in, but do you think
this group is losing touch a bit with the likely consequences of
losing a player of this magnitude to not only themselves but to the
heart and soul of this town and its loyal fans?
People are also reading…
Joe Strauss: So much for
leading off with soft toss.... Look, the organization's delay in
engaging Team Pujols in negotiations should not be misconstrued as
a reluctance to sign him. There are significant forces in play. The
Players Association is acutely interested in Pujols' next contract.
The club has to weight Pujols' value as a player and as a marketing
centerpiece to guaranteed dollars likely committed beyond the most
productive portion of his career. There is also a significant PR
element to this. As currently constructed, the Cardinals can draw 3
million during a fourth-place season. Without Pujols, the team's
fan base may hold the organization to an even higher competitive
standard. The Cardinals have failed to draw 3 million only once
during Albert's tenure here -- and never failed to do so since he
signed his seven-year extension prior to the 2004 season. There are
other factors as well. The Rams and Blues have been rancid for much
of the last seven seasons while the Cardinals have been to two
World Series and endured only one losing season. That dynamic may
be changing as the NFL and NHL franchises recover. Bottom line: Can
the Cardinals justify paying Pujols close to $30 million for the
next five, six or eight seasons while remaining competitive. And if
they answer in the affirmative, is the fan base prepared to pay for
heavier freight?
My information is that the club will engage Pujols' representation in talks about an extension before Christmas. I was reminded of that as recently as yesterday. Stay tuned.
My information is that the club will engage Pujols' representation in talks about an extension before Christmas. I was reminded of that as recently as yesterday. Stay tuned.
Nice to have this distraction in the off-season. Thanks for keeping this up.
Re: Colby Rasmus. Let's just say he's not happy with TLR and wants a trade, but the team decides it wants to keep him. Is it possible that, like many employees with tough bosses, he decides to develop some passive-aggressive tendencies? Perhaps he puts up decent numbers, but develops a penchant for striking out with runners on base in the 9th inning? Perhaps there's some balls that he just can't seem to get to out in center field?
Have you noticed, keen observer that you are, whether ball players with no overt leverage find other ways of expressing themselves?
Joe Strauss: You imply
that the player is quitting on the manager in game situations.
That's a very serious charge and one that I disagree with.
In a broader sense, a player displeased with his manager or coach may allow his work habits to erode. Maybe he becomes consistently tardy or unresponsive to coaching. That's a different question and a tendency that may exhibit itself more consistently. It is, indeed, what got Felipe Lopez exiled in September. A player only buries himself, however, by dogging it in game conditions in front of fans and media. Only a tiny percentage of players are that self-destructive.
In a broader sense, a player displeased with his manager or coach may allow his work habits to erode. Maybe he becomes consistently tardy or unresponsive to coaching. That's a different question and a tendency that may exhibit itself more consistently. It is, indeed, what got Felipe Lopez exiled in September. A player only buries himself, however, by dogging it in game conditions in front of fans and media. Only a tiny percentage of players are that self-destructive.
Joe -- Why the
decision to waive Tom Pagnozzi now? Given the new determination
that strong performance behind the plate isn't enough, it wouldn't
have been a puzzling decision before his September call-up. But in
his 39 at bats this year, he suddenly surprised at the plate - .359
average, .892 OPS, and even better numbers in key situations
(runners on, runners in scoring position, with two outs, after the
6th inning, etc.). Admittedly not lengthy service, but was there
really strong basis for deciding it was probably just a fluke?
Particularly when the realistic options for a back-up with good
catcher skills and a better bat are pretty iffy. My assumption is
always that the management guys, who live the stuff up-close and
non-stop, know a lot more than me -- what were they reacting to
here?
Joe Strauss: I'll be
blunt while also acknowledging that Pagnozzi did a credible job in
September:
1. Pagnozzi has rarely been used as an everyday catcher at any rung of the minor-league system. A big part of that is his offensive struggles. Yes, he showed well in a small number of plate appearances in September. But his history suggests that he is not a major-league hitter. The Cardinals are on record as saying they want their next backup to Molina to offer more of an offensive deterrent. As much as pitchers liked throwing to Pagnozzi, his arm was exposed as average at best. I have no idea whether a health issue was involved, but his arm did not fit the description of a "plus" major-league catcher. The Cardinals hope the next backup will allow Yadier Molina more rest. A decision was made, obviously, that a 28-year-old rookie was not the answer. All that said, Pagnozzi is a class act. One hopes he gets an opportunity to prove himself with another organization after signing as a minor-league free agent.
1. Pagnozzi has rarely been used as an everyday catcher at any rung of the minor-league system. A big part of that is his offensive struggles. Yes, he showed well in a small number of plate appearances in September. But his history suggests that he is not a major-league hitter. The Cardinals are on record as saying they want their next backup to Molina to offer more of an offensive deterrent. As much as pitchers liked throwing to Pagnozzi, his arm was exposed as average at best. I have no idea whether a health issue was involved, but his arm did not fit the description of a "plus" major-league catcher. The Cardinals hope the next backup will allow Yadier Molina more rest. A decision was made, obviously, that a 28-year-old rookie was not the answer. All that said, Pagnozzi is a class act. One hopes he gets an opportunity to prove himself with another organization after signing as a minor-league free agent.
What are the odds that Ted Simmons gets inducted into the Hall this year by the Veteran's Committee? I think his enshrinement is long overdue.
Joe Strauss: I believe
he's got a legitimate shot. He requires 12 votes from the 16-member
committee, which includes Johnny Bench, Whitey Herzog and Ozzie
Smith. Simmons certainly deserved a better fate than being dumped
from the HOF ballot after one year of consideration by the scribes.
Results will be announced Dec. 6 during MLB's winter meetings in
Orlando.
Some claim that you don't
have to break the bank to have a competitive baseball team. The
teams they use as examples would be the Rays, the Reds , maybe the
Twins. Some of these teams have had terrible years to get to the
point they are at now. Who do you think has had the most success
over the long haul base on average salary and competitivenous.
Maybe the cardinals?
Joe Strauss: Despite
allegations by their critics, the Cardinals are not a low-rent
payroll. They've consistently ranked around the upper 30-40 percent
in team payroll. It's hard to argue against the Twins' success on a
"small market" budget. The San Diego Padres typically have held
down costs and were regular postseason participants through 2006.
Ownership intrigue negatively affected them for a period but the
franchise again appears on an upswing, though the loss of first
baseman Adrian Gonzalez after next season appears certain.
Dear Chatmeister: Did
the Cardinals ever get something back from moving Julio Lugo to
Baltimore? Thanks. Love your work.
Joe Strauss: Cash.
O Chatmeister, I
don't mean any disrespect to Bryan Anderson, but it certainly
appeared that the Cardinal starters trusted Pags a great deal more
than they did Anderson. I realize that BA is much younger and MIGHT
have more offensive potential over the long haul (although he
certainly did not look as good at the plate as MP during their
Sept. call-ups), but the logic of just letting Matt Pagnozzi just
walk away totally escapes me. Can you explain the thinking (or lack
thereof) behind this? I always assumed that Anderson would be
packaged into some trade and Pagnozzi would be the backup for
Yadi.
Joe Strauss: The
Cardinals are looking outside the organization for a backup
catcher. Anderson may be marketed as a line-drive lefthanded bat
but his catching skills remains a work in progress. He appears
ticketed for a return to Memphis. Again, many of those who
previously couldn't grasp the skepticism regarding Anderson's
future with the parent club witnessed his raw defensive skills in
September. The Cardinals (and various third-party publications)
fell in love with Anderson during his first three minor-league
seasons. His value, however, has since eroded. He does swing a line
drive bat but doesn't project at another position.
Gone are the days when Whitey or any GM could hit the winter meetings with their offseason shopping list and check off most if not all of their needs by the end of that particular week. On top of the Pujols contract extension, the Cardinals have several critical needs to address this off season. With somewhat limited resources to spend and/or trade, however, Mo is going to have to play it slowly and strategically. This is going to be like watching a chess match...not the norm for regular baseball fans. Don't you think that this will be a fairly long, drawn out process this winter?
Joe Strauss: I
anticipate dominoes will start to fall in the next two weeks. The
club isn't going to allow the Westbrook negotiations to drag on
much beyond this month. There appears a desire to trade for a
backup C and perhaps a SS. Next week's GM meetings may be more
active than in previous years due to this year's accelerated free
agent timetable.
Hi Joe--what are the
chances that Jose Oquendo will manage somewhere next year? I really
don't understand why another team wouldn't grab him away. Is he
waiting in line to manage the Redbirds after Tony decides to ascend
from the head honcho job? Love to read your comments-Thanks
Joe Strauss: It doesn't
look like Jose's opportunity will come next year. When TLR leaves,
it's very likely Oquendo will receive an interview to become his
successor. Jose has interviewed with San Diego and Seattle in
recent years. My information, however, suggests that the Cardinals
will award considerable points for previous major-league managerial
experience when choosing TLR's successor. A logical next step for
Oquendo would be to manage in the Arizona Fall League, but I have
never heard him voice enthusiasm for the idea.
Is Japanese infielder
Tsuyoshi Nishioka a possibility at all for the Cards? My guess is
the cost, for the posting fee and then a salary on top of that,
would be more than the Redbirds are willing to pay. What does the
Master of the Tsunami hear and know about Nishioka?
Joe Strauss: There
appears to be minimal interest due to a combination of expense,
Nishioka's apparent preference to play on the West Coast, and a
belief by many in uniform that Skip Schumaker represents a solid
option at second base while the front office appears committed to
pursue a trade for any upgrade at shortstop.
Second: We can all play with budget numbers all day long. But why would it not be profitable in the long run to give the payroll a "MAJOR" boost. Does Dewallet really think more talent won't fill the house every given night? Cheezy quote to remember: "If he builds it, we will come!"
Joe Strauss: Cazana, 32,
has spent much of his last four seasons in the Mexican League and
appears more of a curiosity than a factor with this organization.
Cazana also must be placed on the 40-man roster this month or be
exposed to the Rule 5 draft. He remains the club's most intriguing
18th round draft pick but does not appear in the big club's
plans.
Can't see moving Ryan. He has only had the one horrible offensive year. If his last two seasons were flip flopped, it wouldn't even be considered. How do other clubs view him?
Joe Strauss: As you do:
Something of a defensive savant still bothered by an inconsistent
throwing motion and low confidence at the plate. He is also
arbitration-eligible, which becomes a subtle influence. No matter
his defensive gifts, Ryan could become a nomadic figure unless he
improves at the plate. (He can no longer be optioned.) For now, he
fits on an otherwise powerful offensive club. Otherwise, a less
robust team such as the Cardinals would examine other options. The
fact that Ryan regressed offensively can't be dismissed. To just
"flip flop" the years isn't an option.
Ok,lets hope
this isn't the scenerio,but lets say we can't sign albert prior to
the season,if management decides a trade is the only option(we
can't let albert walk with no compensation)does a Rasmus/Albert for
Loney/Kemp make sense?
Joe Strauss: The club
wouldn't attempt to trade Pujols unless the parties reached a
negotiating impasse. Pujols would then have to waive rights as a
10-5 player for a trade to go forward. Think about it: Would Pujols
do the club a favor after the Cardinals waited until this offseason
to approach him in earnest about an extension and, then, make an
unsatisfactory offer? It's highly unlikely the club would approach
Albert about waiving his veto power until the sides reached a dead
end? What kind of climate do you believe would then exist. Does
Pujols want to uproot his family for 2-3 months (or a season)
before entering free agency. Highly doubtful.
I know there are always 28 questions about Orlando Hudson....so here we go again. Whenever I read articles or comments about him there is never mention of one of his greatest attributes....his personality. He's always been a beloved teammate and fun loving guy, from what we read/hear. Adding that to his on field performance I just think it makes too much sense to sign this guy.
Is Mo still focused on clubhouse issues as well as on-field? If so, do YOU think Hudson is a great fit?
Joe Strauss: Hudson
would add to the personality mix within the clubhouse. But also at
issue are his fitness as a leadoff hitter (very uncertain) and
where he stands now compared to before his recent wrist problems.
Hudson is likely to command a one-year guarantee, which adds to his
value here. However, as stated previously, there are many within
the organizaton resistent to the idea of demoting Schumaker to a
utility role.
J. Westbrook's career stats are surprisingly unimpressive (73-75, 4.29). $7-$10 million a season seems like a lot of money to pay for someone with those kind of numbers. If he does get signed, what kind of season can we realistically expect from him?
Joe Strauss: That is the
going rate for a veteran No. 3-4 starter for a contending club. And
that is what Westbrook now represents. He eats innings. He involves
his defense. He throws strikes. He's a positive within the
clubhouse. He has the potential to win 13-15 games for a good team.
He fits here. Remember, the club guaranteed Brad Penny $7.5 million
with another $1.5 million in appearance incentives last year. Penny
was projected as a 3-4 starter.
Will Jadi get his
due as the best defensive catcher in baseball and win a Gold
Glove?
Joe Strauss: Yes.
Give us an outside-the-box name (or maybe even a couple players) that haven't been discussed that you think would be a good fit in a Cardinals uniform next year. Thanks!
Joe Strauss: Eric Hinske
as a bench bat. Dan Uggla at second base (highly unlikely).
I understand
that the longer the Cards go without signing Albert to an
extension, the lower the odds are of re-signing him at all. It
seems that you are increasing pestimistic about the club being able
to resign him. Can you tell us why? Is it time to panic? What is
your estimate on the number of fans that will stay home if Albert
leaves? Thanks!!
Joe Strauss: You can
panic if we're having this conversation in two months.
Your thoughts master of the wave?
Joe Strauss: An $110
million payroll is doable and virtually certain in 2012 if Pujols
signs an extension.
There's been a lot of rumbling about adding offense at either 2B or SS, or both. I've heard names like Uribe & Hudson thrown out as possibilites, but after weighing their stats against their salaries, to me they don't seem like a significant enough upgrade to make it worthwhile. Particularly considering the glaring need for 1 & 2 hitters to get on base & score runs. What are your thoughts regarding these two guys? and Who might be some other realistic candidates for improving the top of the lineup & middle infield (whether in-house, or through trade or free agency)?
Joe Strauss: Your points
are valid, though free agent signings come with the bonus of
costing money, not players. The Diamondback's Stephen Drew makes
much sense for a number of reasons. He is a competent defender who
can hit all over the lineup, including leadoff. He has extra-base
power. He is also second-time arbitration-eligible and a Scott
Boras client. You would acquire him for two years. GM John Mozeliak
said Tuesday he believes it more likely the club finds help at
shortstop through trade than free agency. Drew appears an obvious
target.
$30M. $30 million.
$30,000,000.00. Thirty million dollars. That is some serious coin.
I don’t care how it’s written. Assuming attendance at Busch
continues to hover around 3 million per season that means the first
$10 every fan spends at Busch Stadium would go towards Albert’s
contract – each season - for the length of his contact. (I realize
there are other revenue sources as well.) That is staggering. Is he
worth it? I don’t know any man is REALLY worth $30M. I can’t
comprehend those salaries. The nature of his industry justifies it
though. Truth is I’d gladly pay an extra ten bucks to watch Albert
play just as I would pay extra to watch McGwire in his day or Ozzie
or Rolen or Edmonds or Walker or Gibson. These guys are beyond
gifted. They are game changers. They are franchise changers. These
guys give our team an identity no other team has. As ridiculous as
it may sound - if you consider goodwill, road revenue, TV,
merchandising, etc. - he’s probably worth more. Pay the man. This
should be the easiest decision Mo has to make this off season.
Check please.
Joe Strauss: So noted.
You speak for a number of others on the board.
Was Kyle McClellan told
to prepare in the off-season as a starter, or does he already know
he's in the bullpen next season? Any chance the Cards are looking
to pick another setup guy to allow Kyle to compete in Spring
Training for a spot in the rotation?
Joe Strauss: McClellan
conditions each winter as a starter. As of now, he will go to
spring training as a candidate for the rotation. Should Westbrook
return, that equation may change. Indeed, McClellan may have value
elsewhere as well.
The CWS have been openly interested in Colby, they have said to be willing to deal Quentin. I shouldn't even need to say, that this trade would be stupid. If the cards feel they need to trade him b/c of a feud, there should be plenty of better offers on the table. That being said Gordon Beckham is a player that would fill a hole in the cards lineup, do you see any fits here?
Joe Strauss: I don't see
Raz' on the South Side of Chicago next season.
The Giants have
proved that a team doesn't need a superstar 1st baseman to win a
championship. They were a great blend of mid-good to very good
players, who contributed at nearly every position, with only one
superstar pitcher. In contrast, the cardinals are extremely
unbalanced, with a superstar, a near superstar [but offensively
only], an erratic but budding young centerfielder, and not much
else offensively. And they have two, not one, superstar pitchers
and possibly a budding third. It would be nuts to offer the store
or a very long-range contract to pujols. For 25-30 million, they
can find a good mid-level second baseman plus a good mid-level
first baseman, and possibly a backup third baseman and/or catcher.
They would be a heckuva lot more balanced, and might even be more
spirited, although with larussa that's always up for grabs. It
would be equally stupid to trade pujols. The few teams who might be
able to afford him know that he'll be a free agent in a year. No
point in trading away anything good for a year. Better to get one
last good season from pujols and let him walk, and in the meantime
use the saved cash to fill some holes. pujols would also have a
more natural political base in Southern California or chicago. Is
the cardinal f.o. seriously thinking about signing him long-term
during his [admittedly slow] fading years for even bigger bucks
than now? Are the sales of his merchandise really worth all that as
against building a championship team?
Joe Strauss: OK, we now
have the anti-Team Pujols viewpoint. As always, the ChatMeister
strives for balance when atop The Tsunami.
Surfs up
chatmeister, love the chats. My question is this: Will Mo be weary
of looking for any long term solution at 2B with Zach Cox on the
horizon? Does the team still project him as a second baseman? Who
does your gut tell you will be our starting second baseman next
season. Thanks.
Joe Strauss: Cox will
not be next year's second baseman, though he will be seen in
major-league camp. Schumaker still enjoys the public support of the
manager and front office. There appears more an inclination to make
a change at shortstop. However, the situation may change if the
right player becomes available via trade. Very fluid.
I think Drew would be great for SS. Do the Cards have enough to trade for him if they do NOT include Rasmus or Miller? If they do, who would get it done? Thanks.
Lee
Joe Strauss: The D'backs
have a serious need in the bullpen, enough so that they are
considering Trevor Hoffman as closer. Mitch Boggs, Jason Motte or
Kyle McClellan may look like a more appealing alternative. Such a
deal would likely have to expand, but the Cardinals do have a
surplus of RH relief arms who project as closer types.
Is there anyway we could afford to sign, say, Miguel Tejada and Jayson Werth? I know it would necessitate an increase in payroll -- as would re-signing Albert, but to me Werth, Tejada, and bringing back Westbrook would be more than enough to reload for next season...
Joe Strauss: Again, the
Cardinals don't appear in the market to take on a multi-year
contract with a premium free agent. Westbrook is something of an
exception. The club would likely go two years with some sort of
option for 2013. Tejada makes sense on a one-year basis.
Hello again, one
other question for you. You mention Stephen Drew being a potential
trade target. Is there a scenario where we could deal from our
surplus of relievers (AZ bullpen was atrocious) and some other
players (Ryan?) and somehow manage to keep Rasmus and Miller or
would Colby have to go to get Drew? Thank you again!
Joe Strauss: You may be
on to something. The Cardinals were willing to include Ryan for Roy
Oswalt last July. Again, the lack of flexibility with Ryan adds to
the possibility of him being moved this winter. There would be
little need to keep an established starter at SS and Ryan on the
same roster.
Thanks for taking my question. To your knowledge, do the Cardinals have any interest in Bill Hall? I feel that he's similar to Tejada, but possesses more pop. In my humble opinion, the Cards need upgrades at SS AND either 2B/3B. I'd like to see them address one through trade (I'm hoping for Stephen Drew) and one through a relatively cheap free agent. Also, is Uggla completely out of the question?
Thanks again.
Joe Strauss: Bill Hall
does offer versatility, though he becomes exposed as a defender if
used as a starter. Hall has hit .225, .201 and .247 the last three
seasons. He's not the same guy who cranked 35 home runs for
Milwaukee in 2006. The Mariners and Red Sox saw him as more an
outfielder than an infielder. Tejada ranks an edge for me. Uggla
represents a potential short-term fit after rejecting the Marlins'
on a four-year offer. His reported demands for an AAV above $10
million make him a tough fit here long term.
Thanks for shedding light on the Redbirds every week. I love reading the posts and your insight into the closed doors of STL.
You mentioned that Bryan Anderson had his highest stock several years ago. I never understood why management didn't pull off a trade for him back then. With Yadier progressing as planned and projecting to be the everyday backstop, why wouldn't you trade a prospect everyone considered having a great upside. Was there no interest because of his poor defense? Think any AL teams might have interest in him as a DH or not enough power? Thanks.
Joe Strauss: The
Cardinals overvalued him.
You mentioned a couple of times today that Schu is likely to continue to get the opportunity to play 2b because, "there are many within the organization resistent to the idea of demoting him to a utility role".
I've never managed (or played) MLB so I'm wondering... who gets to vote on such things other than the manager and perhaps the GM? Or... are you referring to Mo and Tony when say "many within the org"? Thanks for reading and replying (hopefully).
Joe Strauss: TLR and the
coaching staff remain Schu' backers.
Any news on the "Stand
for Stan" campaign and whether there is a Presidential Medal of
Freedom for Stan Musial in the near future?
Joe Strauss: Haven't heard of
anything imminent. But the campaign did draw thousands to the
club's social media sites.
So how much does the Pitcher's comfort level factor into Brendan's place on the Team? Especially Carp & Waino?
Joe Strauss: There is a
lot of comfort in Ryan as a defender. However, you failed to note
Carpenter's obvious displeasure with Ryan over his tardy on-field
arrival in Cincinnati. Ryan failed to generate a .300 OBP for any
month last season. In today's game that's unacceptable. Drew is no
defensive stiff. He can play. I agree with you that the Cardinals
may be gambling in RF, a position that averaged more than 105 RBI
in 2008-09.
Jon Heyman at si.com said in an article today that Edgar Renteria is open to a position switch to second base to prolong his career. Would Tony be interested in bringing "The Captain" back to play second or as some sort of platoon?
Joe Strauss: Renteria
should be viewed as a boost to someone's bench at this point. He
dealt with numerous physical issues this season and has failed to
achieve a .400 Slug. or .333 OBP the last three seasons. (Edgar had
a .347 OBP and .420 Slg. in his six seasons with the Cardinals.) He
could fill a role similar to that envisioned for Tejada, but his
recent numbers no longer justify 500 plate appearances in a
season.
Much has been said about Colby's future, and we've all heard how he and Tony have patched things up. I have no doubt the primary reason for that claim was to repair his trade value, but it seems likely that the backtory here will make it difficult for the Cards to get "full value" for Mr. Rasmus. For this reason as well as his potential, I'd be happy to see him stay in St Louis, but what do you think of the possibility - and wisdom - of trying to induce Atlanta to trade Martin Prado for Raz (+)? Could CF be properly entrusted to Schu?
On the HOF veterans committee voting, it's my opinion that if Marvin Miller doesn't get in, nobody should. No one has made a greater impact on the game, and without him, Steinbrenner would probably be better known as the son of a shipbuilder.
Thanks for the opportunity, sir.
Joe Strauss: I agree
entirely with your take on Marvin Miller. That Bowie Kuhn beat him
into the HOF is laughable... Prado was arguably the Braves' MVP
last season. However, he does not offer the same potential
production as Rasmus. Schu' or Jay in CF wouldn't compensate. The
Cardinals would seemingly be doubly dependent on what Freese and
Craig provide in such a scenario. In other words, another move
would be necessary.
I know that Ryan was awful at the plate last year, but doesn't his defense lead some to cling to the possibility that his last couple months of offense warrant the focus on change at second rather than short?
Joe Strauss: It's fair
to expect improvement from Ryan. But even when hitting .292 he
averaged an RBI every 10.6 at-bats and an extra-base hit every 13.7
at-bats. Don't overstate his offense. He is a compelling defensive
player. As for Schu', I believe the coaching staff plans for him to
play more man-to-man coverage in 2011.
You have stated a few times recently that Skip’s range was affected this year by a series of injuries. What were those injuries, and does he have the range, when healthy, to be an effective second baseman with a ground ball staff?
Joe Strauss: Schumaker
dealt with leg and forearm/wrist problems for most of the season.
He played his best defense late. That said, the Cardinals'
difficulty turning double plays last season became a repeating
nightmare. True Fact: Schu' has now played more major league
innings at second base (2,003) than in the outfield (1,780).
thanks for the
chats, mr. strauss, very much appreciated by a good majority of the
fan base. so, it seems now that the offensive upgrade will come via
a trade at ss? mo has flexed his muscle a bit this off-season with
changes to the staff, why not put his foot down vis-a-vis skip, and
say no second base soup for schu?
Joe Strauss: I'm
relating a preference, not a cast-in-stone decision. Beyond O.
Hudson, there are few palatable options at second base within the
FA market. As noted last week, Hudson's production numbers last
season were very similar to what Schu' offered in 2008-09.
Schumaker is signed for $2.7M. Ryan is arbitration-eligible. There
also may be a debate whether Ryan's value represents what he may
achieve in arbitration.
In at least recent years, World Series champs have had a dominating, hard-throwing closer to nail down big wins in the playoffs (Jenks, Wainwright, Papelbon, Lidge, Rivera, and now Brian Wilson). While Ryan Franklin has been a solid closer the last 2 seasons, I would not put him in the class of the others mentioned above. What about the Cards going after a more dominating closer such as Rafael Soriano and sliding Franklin back in the setup role. This would finally allow Kyle McClellan a chance in the rotation, where I think most people would agree he has the stuff to succeed. Your thoughts on this as an alternative to signing Westbrook?
Joe Strauss: Franklin
appears set in the role for 2011. The club may then examine its
internal options before deciding whether to seek outside help for
the '12 season.
Thanks again for the chats, hope they keep up during the Hot Stove League. My concern is the rumors swirling around a possible trade of Rasmus. I would really hate to see such a young, gifted player that the Cards developed in their system traded away. His contract status, potential, and youth to me are too valuable to let go. If so many other teams value him, why not the Birds. He will be (or could be) with the Cardinals much longer than after Larussa retires in a year or two. What do you hear?
Joe Strauss: Mo' was
given the chance this week to declare Rasmus untouchable. He
declined. As stated here before, Raz' is in play for the right
price. No, I don't know what that price would be. But he is not off
the market.
how can
you guys talk of teams that did well on the cheap, without
mentioning the marlins?
Joe Strauss: The Fish
have finished second in the NL East. three times and never won
their five-team division in their 18-year history. They have won
the World Series in both their trips to the postseason. Judging by
attendance, it seems their market would apply a different
definition of success.
Joe, appreciate your work ... first time posting.
I enjoyed reading about Sparky Anderson last week along with the relationship he had with Tony.
Does Tony have Sparky-like mentoring relationships with other younger managers in the league? If so, who are they?
Joe Strauss: Jim Tracy
is a big TLR fan, though he's not exactly part of the younger
crowd. John Russell had plenty of respect for TLR before being
fired. Jim Riggleman is a TLR believer. Given recent managerial
turnover within the league, there isn't much of a crowd to draw
from.
In an earlier chat during the club's late-season funk, you said something I whole-heartedly agreed with: that the 2010 Cardinals, via their in-season player moves such as the acquisition of Randy Winn, Aaron Miles, and Pedro Feliz, were modeling themselves after the San Francisco Giants - a team long on starting pitching, but overly reliant on a creaky, veteran-heavy lineup with little pop. By comparison, the Philadelphia Phillies seemed a more solid - though expensive - team in almost every phase of the game. At least they did then.
Given that the Giants just won the World Series - popgun lineup and all - do you think this gives cover to the Cardinals' brass to continue to construct the team to be only the best in a weak division, rather than the best in the NL?
I'm fearing so, but I'm also hoping that on some level they realize that, yes, you really do have a better chance when you have better ballplayers.
Joe Strauss: The Giants
have the look of a one-hit wonder. They appear extremely vulnerable
to hits to their rotation. They were overreliant on one facet that
became overwhelming in September and October. It's doubtful many
organizations will follow that model.
How about Dusty Brown C
Red Sox AAA free agent.Has some pop in his bat and has decent
defense.A Pagnozzi who can hit somewhat.
Joe Strauss: That type
could be in play, but unlikely as first choice.
Hello, long time reader,
first-time questioner...This year was dubbed "The Year of the
Pitcher," and with just cause, but I don't see 2011 being the same.
Would it be in the Cardinals best interest to pursue offense first,
and let the market for pitchers play itself out, and perhaps the
Cardinals can land a gem shortly before Spring Training like they
did w/ Kyle Lohse in 2008. Especially since 4/5 of the starting
rotation is already set. Thanks for your time.
Joe Strauss: The
Cardinals claim to be placing greater emphasis on offense vs.
pitching/defense this winter. We'll see.
I know Orlando Hudson's name has been thrown around as a possible fit for the club, and while I am not a GM, he seems to be a good candidate to at least check in on (TLR would get another veteran player on the team at least). What are the chances he wears a Cards jersey next year?
Joe Strauss: Given the
SS trade market, I still believe Hudson could come into play. The
free agent market should become active earlier this season (though
Type A compensation may slow things for the elites). Hudson fits in
a number of ways. I wouldn't dismiss him as a possibility. However,
Hudson does not offer the "pop" Mo' admits the Cardinals now seek.
Dan Uggla has it. But he comes at a much higher cost in dollars and
personnel.
In your opinion, is Descalso being given a fair shot to earn a starting position in the infield next year? It seems that all of the media reports I've read related to infield options have tended to ignore him. I would think this may be due to interaction with Cardinal management. Thus my question. Also, do you believe he has a future with the Cardinals?
Thanks as always.
Joe Strauss: Descalso
may have a future but has yet to convince many that he rates as an
everyday second baseman. He's a dirt player. His value may exceed
his skill set. Doesn't strike out much. Has some line drive power.
Projects as a complementary player.
What do you think the chances are of the Veterans Committee voting Ted Simmons into the Hall of Fame? Given his "fondness" for Ted's defensive skills, do you think Whitey being on the Committee will help or hurt? I know Jim Palmer (who is also on the Committee) has voiced his support for Simmons being in the Hall. One more question . . . how's your golf game???
Joe Strauss: Simmons has
some support; however, 75 percent is a tough threshold when many
are stumping for George Steinbrenner and Marvin Miller. Whitey
wasted little time trading Teddy when he had him as a player. I
don't know how that translates when it comes to HOF consideration.
My golf game is in need of work.... looking for scholarship at
local establishments.
After calling into MLB
network this morning, and asking Kevin Kennedy what he thought
about Pujols being singed up to a new deal before spring training
starts, his comments were "you have got assume that the salary
would have to start in the 200 million range." Your thoughts on
this please?
Joe Strauss: Very fair
assumption. Seven years at 27.5M = $192.5M.
Has there been any
movement with resigning Westbrook?
Joe Strauss: Cardinals
have made an offer and apparently are willing to let it be shopped.
However, my information is they need to know something within next
two weeks or will move on. The club believes it still has a solid
chance of retaining him.
I can't believe that anyone, other than the manager and one of your colleagues, Jeff Gordon, would advocate trading Colby Rasmus.
Can you?
Joe Strauss: If TipSheet
says to trade Raz', the club should make him "a Cardinal for life"
immediately.
You're a betting guy, so give me some odds:
What are the odds that:
1) Pujols' contract gets done before the season starts
2) Both Ryan and Shumaker start in the infield on opening day
3) Rasmus is the starting center fielder on opening day
4) The Cardinals make an "impact" trade this off-season
Joe Strauss: 1. 40
percent.
2. 25 percent.
3. 80 percent.
4. 60 percent.
2. 25 percent.
3. 80 percent.
4. 60 percent.
I was
listening to mlb on xm the other day and they kept promoting that
Dewitt or Mozeliak (can't remember, getting old sucks) was going to
be coming up next. 2 hours later he still hadn't been on. Did you
happen to catch what he said on the program, if so anything
new?
Joe Strauss: BD3 made an
appearance. Underscored the team's desire to get a Pujols extension
done.
What are your thoughts
on Pujols getting a contract done before the beginning of Spring
Training. Especially with the Jeter Saga out in NY, it would seem
as though AP will be asking for top-top dollar as well (i.e. $30
mil/year range)?
Joe Strauss: My opinion
is if AP isn't done by spring training, it won't get done and at
this time next year we'll be experience a LeBron-like media feeding
frenzy. The Humanity!!!
My question is about why we don't see more minor league trades. Since our new business model relies on the minor leagues to provide major league ready prospects it would seem logical to look for minor league prospects blocked on other teams that might fit our needs in a year or so. A prime example being David Freese coming over from SD where he was blocked. Have you spoken to any Cards brass about this topic? As always thanks for your insight and look forward to your return to the Yards next year!
Joe Strauss: Given the
lack of upward mobility among position players, it's a fair
conclusion to draw. But what is there to deal at this point without
subtracting from the team's competitiveness? The Cardinals are
expected to soon announce Matt Carpenter as their Minor League
Player of the Year. Carpenter's an interesting guy but he'll be 25
next season after spending this year at AA Springfield. He's hardly
considered Can't Miss.
With limited payroll flexibility, aren't the Cardinals better off graduating K-Mac to the rotation than spending $9-11 million per year for 3 or more years on Westbrook? McClellan has proven his durability and has the pitch assortment to go from 70 innings to 170 innings. They do have internal options for the 8th inning role.
Joe Strauss: McClellan's
versatility is a huge asset. Westbrook likely won't receive a
3-year guarantee -- not from the Cardinals anyway. McClellan also
represents another de facto lefthander since his splits against LH
bats are better than many LH relievers.
Thanks again for taking my question. I have been listening to the debate surrounding Colby and for one think trading him would be a major mistake. However, if the Cards are wanting to take chances, why not consider moving Chris Carpenter for prospects instead? Chris is going to make $16 million this year. That money could be used to chase lefty ace Cliff Lee (expected to sign for $18 million). A starting rotation of Adam, Lee, Garcia, Westbrook, Lohse would be quite a group. The reason I propose this, is that I'm worried about Chris's shoulder holding up, and if he goes, so goes any chance to win the division, much less win a ring. What say you oh wave rider of the ocean breeze? Is this worth considering, or should I go back to my sandbox?
Joe Strauss: You go back
to your sandbox. Cliff Lee will go to NY or Texas.
Do you believe the team is looking at trying to generally improve, or are there perceived holes that will be targets for improvement? The 2010 Cardinals wouldn't seem to be a particularly speedy team, better OBP may give Pujols/Holliday more chances, etc. Or is it really just a depth problem and finding "talent" to help...
Joe Strauss: The '10
Cardinals underachieved. I believe that. The everyday lineup is
solid, even with questions 3B and RF. If Freese is healthy -- and
that has shown to be a big IF -- the club looks capable offensively
given an upgrade to the bench. Pitching remains a strength should
Westbrook or his equal be signed. As poorly as the Cardinals
executed for much of last season, they won 86 games and dominated
the eventual division champions. This team has worn down repeatedly
in recent seasons. Finding a way to give Molina more down time and
to have backups closer to the midpoint rather than the end of their
careers could represent major additions. Kyle Lohse is a huge
variable as well. If he remotely resembles 2008, the Cardinals
become a dominant pitching team.
Best guess about where the Cardinals stand on a closer in waiting? Will Franklin be back? Will Motte emerge (or does the front office see him as having unrevealed upside?). Is McClellan "the answer" or more of "an answer"?
It seems the team has arms, but maybe leaving some room for flexibility and looking for one of their guys to "grab the brass ring"?
Joe Strauss: Motte and
Boggs are future options. At some point, the club will have to
weigh what Fernando Salas represents and react accordingly.
McClellan is an asset. By keeping him in bullpen for seveal years,
the Cardinals have suppressed his value in arbitration. They could
move him to rotation in next two years without him becoming
obscenely expensive before free agency. The club loses Lohse after
2012 and must decide on Carp's option after next season. McClellan
offers an alternative for both as Wainwright's contract
increases.
What are the #FreeMoney thoughts on the upcoming college hoops season? I'm looking forward to the Nov. 30th matchup between my Hoyas and the Tigers.
Joe Strauss: In bigger
news, the VCU Rams tip off Friday against UNC-Greensboro. Rams one
of only four teams to win their final game last season. Coming off
back-to-back beatdowns of SLU. Look out!!!
Heard Ryan, Jay, bullpen arm are going out for Stephen Drew.
Joe Strauss: There may
be momentum for a deal going down before the winter meetings. There
is merit to a deal such as the one you suggest, though the
Cardinals would seek another player in return as well.
That's a
wrap for this week. Check listing for next week's wave, as we'll be
attending the GM Meetings in Orlando. Thanks again for making
JSL!!! a cyber-sensation. Check this weekend's P-D for an
off-season primer detailing the team's needs, wants and leverage
for making things happen.