Five topics from columnist Ben Frederickson that St. Louis sports fans should be discussing:
1. Odom numbers that are becoming hard to ignore and explain
As Mizzou athletics director Jim Sterk wrestles with the future of Tigers football coach Barry Odom, these numbers have to be heavy on his mind ...
.455: Saturday’s loss to Tennessee inched Odom’s overall winning percentage down below .500. He’s 24-25 overall. No matter what happens the rest of this season, this will be the first season of his four in which he’s not won more games than the previous season.
One: Under Odom, the Tigers have one win in 10 meetings against Top 25 teams. There’s last season’s upset of Florida in The Swamp, and that’s it. Including that 38-17 signature win, Mizzou has been outscored 336-180 against Top 25 opponents with Odom as head coach.
Five: Let’s call this three-four-five. Three times in four Odom-coached seasons, the Tigers have lost five games in a row. The only exception was last season, a team that lost three in a row and four out of five in the middle of its season.
Seven: Odom’s Tigers have seven more losses (19) than wins (12) against SEC opponents since he took over for former coach Gary Pinkel. That includes the current five-game conference losing streak. This is not a rate that is changing much, either. Mizzou is 6-9 in its most recent 15 conference games.
Twelve: Odom’s Tiger teams have lost 12 games to teams they were favored by Las Vegas to beat. Their record against underdogs is 22-12 after Saturday’s loss to Tennessee, another team they were favored to beat.
Nineteen: Under Odom, Mizzou has 19 more losses than wins against teams that finished their season with or currently have winning records this season. The record reads 3-22, and that includes Saturday’s loss to Tennessee, which improved to 6-5 and became bowl eligible for the first time since 2016.
2. Bortuzzo busted
If there was any doubt about Robert Bortuzzo of the Blues deserving the four-game suspension he was handed for his Saturday night cross-checking of Nashville forward Victor Arvidsson, this series of tweets from hockey writer Adam Gretz should clear things up.
Bortuzzo better clean up his unnecessary stick work when he returns. He’s climbing on the list of players the league likes to punish to create examples.
3. Simmons on his Hall of Fame chances
If only everyone had the same outlook on life as former Cardinals catcher Ted Simmons has on his chances of making the Hall of Fame. Simba missed making Cooperstown by one vote of the veteran’s committee last year. He’s up for consideration again this year. Here’s what he told Dan McLaughlin in a podcast on ScoopsWithDannyMac.com.
"The Hall of Fame would be a wonderful thing to culminate my life in baseball with," Simmons said. "There is no getting around it. I would be really, really pleased if that happened. But, as I said, I've seen so much, and gained so much from this industry, if in fact I didn't end up in Cooperstown, if that didn't happen to me, if I went about the rest of my life lamenting or grieving the idea it didn't happen for me, I'd be ashamed, because so much good has happened to me."
4. First one to 55 wins?
Fans of defense will enjoy tonight’s Hall of Fame Classic game between Cuonzo Martin’s Tigers and Butler at the Sprint Center in Kansas City. The Tigers and Bulldogs both hold spots inside the nation’s top 12 when it comes to points allowed per game. The Bulldogs (5-0) are holding opponents to an average of 53.4 points, good for eighth in the nation. The Tigers (4-1) are giving up an average of 53.8 points, which ranks 12th. As former Mizzou coach Norm Stewart said at Memorial Stadium this weekend: “Cuonzo’s got them guarding.”
Butler has not allowed more than 61 points in any game. Mizzou has not allowed more than 63.
5. Another reason to root for the relocation lawsuit
If you somehow missed it late last week, do yourself a favor and make time for the incredible ESPN article that dives into the drama that is the NFL’s return to Los Angeles. Seth Wickersham and Don Van Natta Jr., provided some interesting tidbits on the league’s legal battle with St. Louis over its relocation rip-job. One of the new facts reported upon was something that had been wondered about but not officially confirmed — the answer to who is covering the legal fees for the teams and the league.
It’s Rams owner Stan Kroenke, according to the article.
Kroenke reportedly signed an indemnification agreement on the morning of the league vote that confirmed the Rams’ relocation to Los Angeles. That agreement has Kroenke on the hook for all fees related to the relocation lawsuit, with ESPN reporting some of the legal bills have reached eight figures for some teams. Those costs are sure to rise, as the NFL just whiffed on another attempt to block St. Louis lawyers from getting nearly a decade’s worth of cellphone records from NFL owners and other top league officials.
Winning legal battles and not spending his money on things that don’t make him more money are near the top of Kroenke’s favorite things to do. This situation has to be driving him nuts. Just another reason to become a fan of the relocation lawsuit.
Quick Hits from BenFred
SWITCH YADI TO THE WAINO CONTRACT PLAN?
QUESTION: Yadier Molina wants to keep playing with the Cardinals. The Cardinals want Molina to keep playing with them. Is there really a need for a premature contract extension before his current contract ends?
BENFRED: No. There's no real need to rush ahead to a multi-year extension with a soon to be 38-year-old catcher who is not yet eligible to leave via free agency. It's unnecessary. And avoiding unnecessary contract extensions with plus-30 players should be pretty easy to justify and explain to those players.
During this current contract, Molina has waffled when it comes to his desires about what he wants to do after it ends. He initially said he would retire. Now he says he wants to play. The Cardinals should simply point to that example of change and say, hey, let's decide when you get through 2020. Let's revisit this then, and if you still feel the same way, we will knock out a one-year deal. And if you want to keep playing after that, we can do another one-year deal.
If Molina objects to that, then things get harder. But the free-agent market tells us things are not kind to 38-year-old catchers, even great ones. I don't think the Cardinals need to extend Molina prematurely just because he wants that. They should push back, carefully, against the assumption they have to.
Why not switch Molina to the Wainwright plan after this season? Did anyone think Wainwright was going to pitch elsewhere? No. Molina would be no different. And if the Cards did say, hey, let's go year-to-year and made a fair offer -- and Molina rejected it to go elsewhere, then I imagine there would be as many fans who understood the Cards' approach as there would be ticked-off fans.
Maybe I'm wrong there. I just don't think Molina would get the kind of offer the Cardinals would give him, comfort and legacy perks included, on the free market.
YOUTH MOVEMENT IN THE OUTFIELD ... OR NOT?
QUESTION: If the Cardinals are presenting Dexter Fowler and Harrison Bader as returning starters next season, that leaves one outfield spot for the competition among up-and-coming young outfielders. Can much be decided if that's the case?
BENFRED: I've asked that same question. The Cardinals are trying to play this both ways a little bit. The young outfielders are going to upgrade the offense, we were told. But they're not going to be a threat to Fowler and Bader? Then how much of an upgrade can they be?
And if they are the answer, then why did that crop of young outfielders get such little action last season? It's not as if the outfield was booming then. I know a year makes a big difference, but it is more than fair to wonder how much a difference these guys will make -- and how much of a chance they will really get.
It's also easier to say Bader and Fowler are starters right now, in November, than the alternative. Any outfielder who feels like his spot is locked in at this moment is probably a tad overconfident. A lot could change before, during and after spring training.
CARDINALS IN THE MIX FOR LINDOR?
QUESTION: Should the Cardinals be considered in the mix for Francisco Lindor if Cleveland decides to trade him?
BENFRED: You only give up the kind of trade package that will land Lindor if you are convinced you can sign him to an extension. He's a free agent in 2022, and has indicated he's all for exploring that free agency when it arrives. Hard to blame him for that. He just turned 26 and will have a big, big market waiting on him when he gets there, as long as the bottom doesn't drop out, and there's no reason to think it will.
The Cards like DeJong. They like what they have bubbling up in the farm system for third base. With that in mind, I don't think they make the painful swap it takes to get just two guaranteed years of Lindor when there is reason to believe he would not be interested in signing an extension before trying his hand at free agency. Would be fun to see him in St. Louis, for sure. But I don't see it.
HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE FOR ALBERT TO MAKE AN IMPACT?
QUESTION: How will we know that Jeff Albert's coaching is working, and how long should it take for those improvements to be visible?
BENFRED: Great question. I'll add another one. How do we know that whatever was going on in Houston did not make Albert's teachings look better than advertised?
The Cardinals clearly viewed 2019 as a sample size that was too small to give much of a read on Albert's hire. In fact, they doubled down on their belief in him by firing longtime hitting teachers in Budaska and Greer. If the front office really does stand pat this offseason in terms of helping the offense, that puts even more pressure on Albert and his philosophy to produce results in '20. If the offense lags again, then what?
It should be fair to expect results from the hitting coach in year two, especially if the front office makes sure all instructors are speaking his language. Right?
WAITING AND HOPING WITH CARP
QUESTION: Do the Cardinals have any sort of metrics or inside knowledge that makes them believe Matt Carpenter can bounce back next year?
BENFRED: It seems to be more old-fashioned hope than anything.
The Cardinals are basically saying, look, he can't be as bad as he was last season. Look at what he did for that awesome stretch in 2018. Can Carpenter be better than 2019? Sure. Can be he close to what he was during that stretch in 2018? Tough to imagine that at this point, but who knows.
Since September 2018, he has been one of the least effective regular hitters in baseball. If he can be somewhere close to his career average, the Cardinals would have to be thrilled.
TRADE WITH THE ROCKIES FOR OFFENSE?
QUESTION: Could the Cardinals work out a trade with the Rockies for offensive help? Trevor Story or Charlie Blackmon?
BENFRED: I don't think the Cardinals are interested in adding a shortstop (Story). They are all-in on Paul DeJong. Blackmon would be nice, and he's always been appealing to the Cardinals, but that kind of move would be a shift away from the Cardinals' plan of trusting the young outfielders this upcoming season. And perhaps that plan does change. Things evolve over the course of an offseason. Happens all the time.
The Rockies say they want pitching and a catcher. The Cardinals can offer both. If Yadier Molina is going to keep playing, the Cardinals could shop Andrew Knizner. The big question, though, is if the Rockies are interested in trading their best players? Recent comments from their front office have suggested they are interested in competing, not pressing the refresh button. Trading Blackmon, a four-time All-Star under contract through at least 2021, when his player option arrives, would feel like pressing refresh.
He's also owed $21.5 million in each of the next two seasons, and the Cardinals have said they are not interested in a big uptick in payroll, so somebody would have to go. And not someone who had to be traded at a loss, either. Paying a player to play elsewhere counts as payroll, in the ownership's eyes.
RED SOX AS TRADE PARTNERS? NOT LIKELY
QUESTION: What are your thoughts on Boston's Andrew Benintendi? Speed. Pop. And he has ties to the St. Louis area.
BENFRED: I like the player and the potential fit, but I'm not sure why the Red Sox would be interested in dealing him. The new front office there has been asked to provide sustained success that lives beneath the luxury tax. Benintendi is the kind of player who helps you get there. He's 24 and not a free agent until 2023.
If the Red Sox trade Mookie Betts or Jackie Bradley Jr., more will be expected from Benintendi.
And yes, I believe his girlfriend is a St. Louis native.
WHY THE DELAY ON MIZZOU'S APPEAL?
QUESTION: Is there any sense of why the NCAA hasn't yet ruled on Missouri's appeal of its postseason ban? Is there a chance a bowl ban could extend into next year if a ruling isn't issued until after the season? Maybe it would be better just to drop the appeal if the season continues to sink?
BENFRED: To start, no. No sense of what is taking so long, and why. And everyone at Mizzou has made the transition from confused, to frustrated, to downright (angry).
Athletics director Jim Sterk has leaned on the SEC and the NCAA to get an answer. It would be absurd to think this could bleed into next season, but then again, Mizzou expected to know as soon as late September. Some believe the decision has been made but its the vetting of the decision through countless lawyers that takes so long. I don't know for sure. But there's no way it should not be released this season. None.
There is also no way Missouri will drop the appeal. The school has spent a pretty penny on legal fees fighting this thing. It's not going to punt now. And, remember, it's not just the postseason ban that is being appealed. There are recruiting restrictions that are being pushed back against as well. And another thing: If Mizzou wins its appeal, it gets its cut of the postseason dollars. That's not going to be given up on either.
The NCAA should be called out for taking so long on this. There's just no need for this waiting game.
TIME FOR 'ARMY' TO GO SHOPPING?
QUESTION: Given the Blues' anemic offensive production the last few games, is it time for "Army" to go shopping for a scoring winger? If somehow we could pry Brad Marchand, aka "The Rat" away from Boston, could you embrace him as a Blue?
BENFRED: Anyone who says they have a good feel for what is going on in Doug Armstrong's brain is guessing. He's made it clear he believes this is a championship window, and his moves reflect that. That said, I think the Blues want to and need to get a better grip on what some of these young guys already in the system can offer before they go and seek big moves from outside, especially due to the cap mess that could create if and when Tarasenko returns for the postseason.
As for Marchand, he would be beloved by any team that considers him one of its own, and hated by every team that does not.
MAROON'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BLUES
QUESTION: Do you think Pat Maroon holds any grudges against the Blues for not bringing him back? At the time I thought it was probably smart to not bring him back, but hindsight is 20/20 and it sure looks like we could use him now.
BENFRED: I'm sure he would have liked to stay here, on his terms, but I believe the Blues were pretty upfront and honest with him about their situation and the list of how they hoped to go about finalizing their offseason plans. It didn't work out, and they kept Maroon up to date on what was going on. I don't think he felt misled or disrespected. His comments made that clear.
The Blues under Berube's system could always use a player like Maroon. That's not going to change anytime soon.
FAIR TO CRITICIZE CUONZO?
QUESTION: Is it fair to criticize Cuonzo Martin's effectiveness at this point? It's year three, and the Tigers are going to have to drastically outpace expectations to reach the NCAA Tournament.
BENFRED: It's fair to examine the success of any coach who is making a lot of money. Cuonzo is no different. I'd just remind folks of where things where when he took over. Missouri was the biggest impostor of a high major program in a Power 5 conference for three years running when Martin got the job. That was the reality. He turned that into an NCAA tournament team in his first season.
He got dealt some terrible luck when it came to the health problems of the Porter brothers, a deal every coach in the country would have loved to have. It didn't work out. Last year was a struggle, in large part because Jontay was not out there. The benefit of it was a lot of young guys -- Tilmon, Pickett, Smith, Pinson, Watson, others -- took their lumps and got better for it. We've seen how much Pinson has grown already. Dru Smith is showing he's a difference-maker after sitting out his transfer season. Tilmon is a beast -- when he's not in foul trouble.
As far as expectations for this season, base them on what you have watched, not what a bunch of football-focused writers picked during the heart of football season when the basketball ballot arrived. Mizzou is 3-1 with all wins coming in lopsided fashion. Their only loss is on the road, in overtime, against a Xavier team that is now ranked 18th. Their team defense is surrendering an average of 54.3 points per game, which is tied with Butler for 16th-best in the nation.
I think this team is going to be better than people think, when all is said and done. And I think Cuonzo is doing a good job. He needs to land a major commit from STL soon. He will. Just a matter of time. He's already started getting the guys -- Tilmon, Pickett, McKinney, Watson, Smith -- who were passing over the Tigers in the past.
WHAT'S DOOLEY DOING WRONG?
QUESTION: What is Mizzou offensive coordinator Derek Dooley doing wrong?
BENFRED: The biggest thing would seem to be an inability to figure out how to find some sort of a spark for an offense that has spent the past four games showing little to no signs of life. The offensive line has regressed. The running game is not a threat. The deep passing game, never strong this season, has pretty much dried up. It's looked bad with and without Kelly Bryant. So, take your pick. The offense has scored 27 points, total, in its past four games.
When Barry Odom became a head coach, he made it pretty clear his offensive coordinator was going to be the head coach of the offense. He handed those keys to Dooley upon his hire, a questionable one at the time, considering Dooley had never before called plays.
Dooley's hire is on Odom. The offense's nosedive is on Dooley.
OZUNA AND THE GREAT AMERICAN SMALL PARK
QUESTION: Is Marcell Ozuna a potential MVP candidate if he signs with the Reds, considering how their ballpark turns good hitters into great hitters?
BENFRED: I'm not sure Ozuna is an MVP candidate in any ballpark unless he's sharing a lineup with a locked-in Giancarlo Stanton, like he was in Florida.
Anyway, Ozuna has five homers in 100 career at-bats at Great American. His OPS is .770 there. He's much, much better at Miller Park. He has not crushed in Cincinnati like we might assume.
ASTROS BECOMING THE PATRIOTS OF BASEBALL?
QUESTION: What the Astros are accused of in this sign-stealing scandal does not pass the sniff test, but is it that different than having a runner relay signs from second base? It feels different. But is it really that different?
BENFRED: Some of this is on baseball, right? When your sport embraces the whole "unwritten rules" acceptance of what is "wrong" and "right" there is always going to be gray area. But using tech to steal signs and relay it to hitters in real time during that same game is over the line. Pitchers and catchers know when a runner is on second. They don't know if a mystery camera is hiding in center field. They suspect it now. They didn't know it then.
You're right. It doesn't pass the smell test. It does not pass the rules, or the commissioner's warnings. Remember in 2017, when the Red Sox got caught with the Apple Watch in the dugout. Rob Manfred made it clear then that using tech for this kind of stuff was outside of the rules. He has since made it even more clear. So, anything the Astros can be proven of doing after that must be punished. Hard. Many inside the game are eager to see the Astros fall.
They've become the Patriots of baseball.
Follow-up: The Astros made electronic sign-stealing an organization-wide effort. That has to be punished harder than the Cardinals' hacking of the Astros to see if the Astros stole from the Cardinals, right?
BENFRED: Hold up. I don't think you can definitively say it was the entire organization behind the Astros sign-stealing. At least not yet. That's a big part of Commissioner Manfred's ongoing investigation. How high up did it go? The email from a front office member to the scouting department about studying opposing dugouts for signs, even using cameras if need be, is not a good look for Houston. That established a connection to the front office.
But that's a separate instance than the camera and trash-can banging stunt. Who knew, and what they knew, is going to be perhaps the most interesting conclusion of Manfred's investigation.
The Cardinals said, and MLB agreed, that their hacking scandal was a lone-wolf operation. Some doubt that. MLB didn't. Can the Astros prove the same?
WAITING ON THE MLS
QUESTION: Any news on when MLS could announce its team name?
BENFRED: Carolyn Kindle Betz told me the reveal of the name and colors is targeted for sometime in the first half of 2020.
So, no, not in time to buy holiday gear with the new swag. Bummer, I know.